Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
ICM vs. Chip Chop at MTTs ICM vs. Chip Chop at MTTs

11-22-2016 , 06:36 AM
Hi everyone! I've been watching the EPT11 London ME Final Table. Once three handed, the remaining players (McPhee, Killeen, and Pauli) talk about a deal, once around the 30-min mark and once around the 37-min mark in the video, which is here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CiniAAcAgtQ

Pauli, the overwhelming chip leader, seems to disagree to an ICM deal, where the shorter two players disagree with chip chop. Pauli thinks that the ICM is unfair to the chip leader. Can someone explain this to me? Or point me to an article/forum post that explains this?
ICM vs. Chip Chop at MTTs Quote
11-22-2016 , 07:55 AM
well, isn't it kinda self-explenatory?

ICM method of calculating deal puts a lot of value of "life" in tournament, and is therefore giving a lot of value to shortstacks

simple chipchop gives no value to tournament life, and is therefore bad for shortstacks

neither method is perfectly adequeate, people used to think that ICM is much better, but then good players realised how much pressure can CL apply and now they are both similarly (in)adequate
ICM vs. Chip Chop at MTTs Quote
11-22-2016 , 09:30 AM
I get that. They were saying all this on the video as well, but Pauli was the overwhelming chip leader. Had both the other players covered twice, so as an amateur student shouldn't he take that deal given the risk of going heads-up against a pro and losing it all?

Like, how much money would ICM lose him vs. Chip Chop there? Can you tell me how I would go about calculating that? Thanks
ICM vs. Chip Chop at MTTs Quote
11-22-2016 , 09:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aryafsharm
I get that. They were saying all this on the video as well, but Pauli was the overwhelming chip leader. Had both the other players covered twice, so as an amateur student shouldn't he take that deal given the risk of going heads-up against a pro and losing it all?

Like, how much money would ICM lose him vs. Chip Chop there? Can you tell me how I would go about calculating that? Thanks
Using an online ICM calculator, lets take an example where the payouts are 50,30, and 20 for 1st, 2nd, and 3rd, and the chip stacks at 10k, 3k, and 2k. ICM would pay them out at 42.7, 30.3, and 27. A straight chip chop would value it at 66.7, 20, and 13.3

Chip chops are rarely fair. As you can see in the above example, a straight chip chop would pay third less than third place, so he has no incentive at all.
ICM vs. Chip Chop at MTTs Quote
11-22-2016 , 09:53 AM
I never chop because heads up is here the fun is. Winning tourneys has a unique satisfaction to it.
ICM vs. Chip Chop at MTTs Quote
11-22-2016 , 10:10 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpewingIsMyMove
Using an online ICM calculator, lets take an example where the payouts are 50,30, and 20 for 1st, 2nd, and 3rd, and the chip stacks at 10k, 3k, and 2k. ICM would pay them out at 42.7, 30.3, and 27. A straight chip chop would value it at 66.7, 20, and 13.3

Chip chops are rarely fair. As you can see in the above example, a straight chip chop would pay third less than third place, so he has no incentive at all.
Thanks Do you know what the formula is that ICM calculators use? I'm just asking out of curiosity.

So basically, this Pauli guy was being stubborn for no reason. If I find myself in that spot against McPhee and Killeen I'd take ICM every day. Better win 7.3k less than 1st place pays rather than lose 12.7 winning 2nd place because I wanted to joust with MTT veterans
ICM vs. Chip Chop at MTTs Quote
11-22-2016 , 10:12 AM
Nevermind found the formula. If anyone else is interested it's: http://www.pokerology.com/lessons/icm/
ICM vs. Chip Chop at MTTs Quote
11-22-2016 , 11:56 AM
Pauli was not just some amateur student, he was already an accomplished online player when he won. On the other hand, guys like McPhee, who play most of their volume live these days, are probably way behind the learning curve. Denying the icm deal was a pretty obvious decision.

Producers usually downplay poker accomplishments for non-huge names on streams to create some "cinderella stories".
ICM vs. Chip Chop at MTTs Quote
11-22-2016 , 04:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aryafsharm
Pauli was the overwhelming chip leader. Had both the other players covered twice, so as an amateur student shouldn't he take that deal given the risk of going heads-up against a pro and losing it all?
This thinking only makes sense if you believe Pauli felt he was lucky just to get to that point and thought he was a fish swimming among sharks.
ICM vs. Chip Chop at MTTs Quote
11-27-2016 , 02:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tutejszy
Producers usually downplay poker accomplishments for non-huge names on streams to create some "cinderella stories".
Haha very true. Well, I didn't know Pauli is accomplished online, but honestly some of his plays totally stunk.
ICM vs. Chip Chop at MTTs Quote
11-28-2016 , 04:09 AM
I was just thinking about this...is chipchop a straight percentage of your relative stack to the corresponding percentage of prize pool?

What is the 'fair' way then if not either method?
ICM vs. Chip Chop at MTTs Quote
11-28-2016 , 08:24 AM
Make them an offer they can't refuse.
ICM vs. Chip Chop at MTTs Quote
11-28-2016 , 09:29 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ss1
What is the 'fair' way then if not either method?
"Fair" is accepting whatever amount I feel like on that particular day.
ICM vs. Chip Chop at MTTs Quote
11-28-2016 , 11:41 AM
Fairer is paying everyone the lowest place $ (ie with 4 players, everyone gets 4th place $) and then using either method to distribute whatever payout is left.

AW
ICM vs. Chip Chop at MTTs Quote
11-28-2016 , 04:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AugustWest63
Fairer is paying everyone the lowest place $ (ie with 4 players, everyone gets 4th place $) and then using either method to distribute whatever payout is left.

AW
Isn't that how it's done? For ICM, the remainder is some weird calculation that favors smaller stacks and for CC, the remainder is based on percentage of stack to total chips?
ICM vs. Chip Chop at MTTs Quote
11-29-2016 , 08:15 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ss1
Isn't that how it's done? For ICM, the remainder is some weird calculation that favors smaller stacks and for CC, the remainder is based on percentage of stack to total chips?
Well, ICM takes into account the fact that smaller stacks sometimes win, either by playing perfectly (Jacobson in 2014) or by running great (Hachem in 2005) therefore ICM (correctly) assigns some extra equity to smaller stacks.

Another thing that comes into play in Tourneys, is who is behind those chips. Give a 50BB stack that's still the shortest to Phil Ivey, and he has a bigger chance of winning it than, say, me.
ICM vs. Chip Chop at MTTs Quote
11-29-2016 , 10:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AugustWest63
Fairer is paying everyone the lowest place $ (ie with 4 players, everyone gets 4th place $) and then using either method to distribute whatever payout is left.

AW
umm, how did you think it was done? did you actually think you could end up with less than 4th with 4-handed deal? lol
ICM vs. Chip Chop at MTTs Quote

      
m