Thanks for advice all.
Quote:
Originally Posted by WereBeer
Some absurdly bad posts ITT, what's a bad post? One that says 'with AK always...' or 'with AK never...'.
OP, you need to start with the basics. As Kelvis said, the problem is not AK, the problem is that you lack very fundamental poker skills. You don't appreciate the importance of stack sizes. You don't size raises correctly. You consider running into better hands to be 'bad beats'.
See, I don't doubt that this is the case, and yet, I win the majority of sit and gos I play in. Is it just wild coincidence that the past five or six times I've lost has been when I've held AK?
If I'm habitually playing wrong, why am I getting away with it with other hands but not when I hold AK?
I honestly feel like I know how to play something like 77 or JQs better than AK. I've read a good amount of poker books, but this was a few years back. They were about things like how to profile opponents, Phil Helmuths sticks with me: the elephant (call station), the mouse, the jackal etc. I read a good nine or ten books on that sort of level.
I would like to be better, can anyone point to guides on stack size and correct raising?
In my mind I only make two kinds of raises: ones I hope to get called because I am sure I have the better hand, and ones where I hope to shove the opponent(s) off and take the hand. Generally I'd characterise my play as "tight, aggressive". Which is to say, I'm tight until I have a good hand pre- or post- flop and then bet aggressively.
I can see how I played that last AK hand wrong in retrospect, the re-raise wasn't big enough and maybe I should have gone all in there. I still think I'd have lost though, because that guy was a maniac and was never going to fold a TT in any case. So even with "correct" play I'd have still lost.
But this is why I hate AK, it feels so powerful but if you miss your draw you are completely committed and bust. It wrecks me every time.