Quote:
Originally Posted by kewljason
I don't get what you are saying? 88 vs 10 is not a borderline decision like those that you mentioned. Splitting 88 vs 10 is pretty cut and dry the better play than standing or hitting. But what is different about this play than many other splits is that it is a defensive split. Splitting doesn't turn the hand +EV. It is a -EV play whether you split, stand or hit, but splitting is just a little less negative (double negative, which is a grammer no-no, lol) You just lose a little less by splitting.
it kinda sucks when the great KJ disagrees with one of the things I post.
I had to double check both BJA3 and Professional BJ to reassure myself.
Using hi-lo, the index for surrendering 88 vs. 10 is 0. This led me to believe the decision tree between surrendering and splitting is close.
Of course I meant splitting if DAS (-0.483) or NDAS (-0.493) is better than standing (-0.537) and hitting (-0.535).
It is not as slightly better than surrendering (-0.500) as I thought. What led me to saying it is close is that the index is 0, but it may be rounded down (maybe it's close to 0.5) or more dynamically changing to the index.
So I think with this new found information, if the RC is 0, the actual correct play is to split instead of surrendering?? BS is a little inaccurate here??
edit: nvm, I've been playing wrong BS my whole life. The actual BS is EP, not RP.
Last edited by tiger415; 10-13-2014 at 05:08 PM.