I think I can sum up my side of this argument with this article :
http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/Careers/07/08/looks/
Admittedly, it might make a difference. I just don't think it makes a big difference, definately not as much of a difference as some of you seem to be coming off as it being. Not even close, especially the higher up you go.
Pretty much, this is what I'm arguing:
"How does this reconcile with all the research? Hiring managers say it is the appearance of confidence they find attractive, not the presence of physical beauty. And they contend that attractiveness has more to do with how you carry yourself and the energy you exude -- rather than having perfect features or a great physique.
According to Gordon Wainright, author of "Teach Yourself Body Language," anyone can increase their attractiveness to others if they maintain good eye contact, act upbeat, dress well (with a dash of color to their wardrobe) and listen well. "
You may believe its attractiveness, but I think confidence comes hand in hand with attractiveness in most cases, thereby making people believe it is attractiveness. I think it has more to do with confidence. I know plenty of fat bald guys that are successful. I know some tall good looking guys that are successful too. But they all are confident, hard working, good communicators, and I don't attribute their success to their level of attractiveness.
Does this make sense, or no?
And for the above poster, I would rate myself a 9. heh, only kidding.