Quote:
Originally Posted by rafiki
How do people think government created cryptos will fair and what will it to do the concept of central banking as we know it? Was reading the Bank of China is working on that. Having trouble wrapping my head around that.
Government crypto is bs.
The only real difference is that there will be proof of stake whereas the central bank has all the power. Maybe even more power over individual balances as they have today. It might also provide more liquidity to "real" cryptos... not sure how costs will be reduced or not. But you totally miss the point if you believe crypto might save 10% costs for central bank.
Why?
We already have digital currency, whenever you transfer money from your bank, there is little physical exchange happening anymore. It works reasonably well.
So think about, the only thing that makes crypto special is that the Sovereign is NOT a government, but a group of people, the market or whatever you wanna call it. At the end of the day, each currency has its community and the currency lives or dies by the support and use cases.
Thinking in communities is very helpful.
Cryptos are trustless, you know what you get. No backroom of 5 supposed economic wizards decides how much your money is worth tomorrow. You know BTC's policies in 2035, the only unknown is if it will be relevant (either bc another coin is better, or the community forks significantly, which is kind of the same thing).
Governments use the power over their currency to achieve their goals. Whether that's good or bad or helpful doesn't really matter. That's another discussion.
The point being, no government would create a trustless currency. That's like a monopoly deciding that competition is good for business (lol, obv not!)
The whole point of fiat money is that you can adapt to economic cycles and use currency as a geopolitical tool and whatever else.
Crypto is competition.