Quote:
Originally Posted by housenuts
There's 2 forks.
Soft fork - attackers eth is worthless, unusable
Hard fork - eth stolen by attacker returned to dao/token holders
Think most resistance is towards the hard, not necessarily the soft
I disagree. A's someone who owns Ethereum I think that there is serious resistance against both types of forks.
I think it is far less likely that the community would approve of a soft fork that leads into a hard fork because there are not enough strong arguments made for total return of funds.
Vitalik should offer an all or nothing solution. A singular hard fork that returns all ether to the original contract address and allow slock and the dao to do whatever they decide. Or he should completely wash his hands and simply state that the Ethereum foundation has concluded that the contracts were executed as intended and there is no added risk to the security of the network.
He's not going to get both. Either he hard forks now because there is strong enough momentum at this time or he lets the dao bleed out.