Quote:
Originally Posted by TomCollins
I call him a patent troll because he has a patent for something that should never have been given one for something so obvious. You shouldn't get patents for things that are so stupidly obvious like putting a wire in a clothing. Non-obviousness is something that someone of average skill wouldn't be able to figure out how to do it. Putting a wire in clothing is about as obvious as possible.
You should understand the definition of something before making accusations which are not correct.
The definition of a patent troll is someone who buys a patent with 'no intention to further develop, manufacture or market the patented invention and then sues a corporation who has infringed upon their patent.'
The definition of a patent troll has nothing to do with whether TomCollins from 2+2 Forums, Mark Cuban, or anyone else think that the individual 'should not have received a patent for a particular product/invention etc.'