Quote:
Originally Posted by ama0330
Hey Arturius,
Awseome post and thank you! I just wanted to ask - how did you get into DT? Can you tell us a little about your market background? I'm just starting out in the market with some very simple, large cap long positions but am curious about DT and would like to know how steep the learning curve is. Do you have a financial background?
I dont want to press you for personal information, but Id be really interested to know what kind of profit margins you were pulling in the beginning and how long it took you to realise real profit from DT.
Thanks
ama
My uncle was a big commodities trader way back in the 1980s, and I remember when I was a kid I used to talk about stocks, resources, trying to understand that the 'futures' market didn't actually mean some market going on in the future
As I got older I never really became to interested in stocks, I always thought the fundamental stuff was kind of boring, so I never really got into it. Later I went to university to get my finance degree, I started playing online poker on the small stakes. I ended up doing an assignment on behavioral finance, I read some books about these 'day traders' on the floor, and I was intrigued about the concept of 'reading' the market in order to make a profit. I read Bernstein and his summary of the history of the markets, found it intensely interesting how far we've come. The more I read, the more I found about the pitfalls people faced. I saw the flaws in the media, how they explained situations. The more I learned about how the market worked, the more I wanted to know. I ended up getting a job with a bank here in Australia, although it wasn't anything like floor trading, it did involve some accounting style work with risk management.
Being a stereotypical generation Y, I ended up quitting that job to search for something more. My poker skills were growing, and I was able to make a good living just based on those skills. I also managed to meet a highly successful day trader on a forum, in exchange for teaching him poker, he taught me some of the finer points of trading. This stuff was extremely valuable, it was all ideas and thoughts about how to exploit pricing differences, how to use context to identify ideas, and how price movements work. He opened me to how to see institutional traders, how they move, and how to exploit it.
I started up with an account of $15000, I had a big drawdown of about $8000 at the beginning, but I stuck to my guns and managed to hammer down a much better system. I kept learning, kept my ear to the street, talked with my mentor, worked towards a better system. It takes a LONG time to get comfortable with the markets. There's no way I could survive the last 3 months without the skills I built over the last 3 years. The volatility would have crushed me, but now days I'm smart enough to use it. I'm always working on new ideas, a new play, trying to perfect my craft.
As for profit margins, its like saying how many women you've slept with, the number is either too low and people think you suck, or its too high and people think its a brag. The Van Tharp books I posted go into money win rates in a lot more depth then I ever could. I think the best way to figure it out is to see it for yourself. My estimates about how much I could make from day 1 held pretty true, although it took a long time to do it consistently!
Quote:
Originally Posted by kimchi
Thanks for posting all that. i think it's significant that you focused on some psychological issues.
I'm currently working on a new trading system and I've posted my ideas so far on this board. I'm only 10% (or less) done and have yet to work on entries, exits, and money management (the last 2, bar psychology, being the most important imo). I'd appreciate your opinions, suggestions and input so far: http://forums.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=68213
Just like to emphasise this book from your list. I read it a few years ago and I've been working on incorporating his 'predictive moving averages' ever since. I think his system with a discretionary element is what separates the break-even system traders from the profitable strategy traders. I think he's also an honest guy and a successful trader - unlike most authors.
I'd like your opinion on trading systems. I've ran several trading systems live with some good and some not so good results, and tested many others. I focus on objective linear methods for mechanical trading systems. Do you think this is a viable strategy? My brain says no, but my testing and results disagree:- a surgeon or bus driver is needed to make discretionary decisions in their day to day work. I wouldn't trust a mechanical system to drive me around or operate on me in a hospital. Sure, they will often be able to work with unconscious competence, but it's those times when something goes wrong; the patient goes into cardiac arrest or someone jumps in front of the bus. Just like unexpected market events, not everything can be anticipated or pre-programmed. It is these "fat-tail" events that often bust out even the PhDs and the like (eg-LTCM),, or slowly endure the degradation their mechanical systems face over time.
2 questions:
1 - Do you think a purely objective mechanical system can make money consistently over time (eg-Richard Dennis' turtle trading methology of the 1980s) with no discretionary or subjective trader input other than parameter settings and system design?
2- Do you believe that any concept can be traded profitably given intelligent exits and position sizing? (eg-financial astrology, sunspot activity.....random trade entry). I remember reading somewhere about how Tom Basso designed a profitable trading system using random entry as an exercise to show how exits and position sizing are the most important part of a trading system.
I suppose I'm at the consciously incompetent trader level right now, but I've never had the desire to day trade (I hold from days to years, depending on the system). I'd appreciate if you could give a brief overview of what your trading methodology is. I know some traders don't like to disclose this. I've spent years studying and designing trading systems and I'm sure you have too. I'm more interested in your broad trading concept and how you define your edge.
I'm not a mechanical trader, but take a look at Trading Digest from my blog links, he is and I've talked to him a few a times. He's a smart guy and is very disciplined in his system creation. Take a look at his posts. Mech trading has always interested me, that'll have to wait till I get better at java though
1. Absolutely. But you still need an edge. Looking for simple moving average crosses
is not an edge. Your system has to be smarter then just looking for when your indicator does something 'meaningful'. Curve fitting when back testing mech trading systems is a big problem, and difficult to overcome sometimes. If I were designing a system, I'd be looking for odd relationships that occur in different market environments. At the moment, most portfolio managers have been moving away from consumer discretionary stocks to consumer staples. Its obvious its a flight from risk. I'm sure using some weird indicators, you could create an interestingly profitable system. Every trader and his dog have come up with simple systems using cross overs, but they still need to reflect the reality of how people are trading the market.
2. For sure. Exits are so so difficult to identify as a discretionary trader. The best way is to think of possible price outcomes, and never be caught off guard. Entries are highly overrated, but think of it this way. Entry is where you identify the edges, sort of like preflop play. I know calling with a pocket pair for whatever stack is a good play. Exits are postflop, its your bread and butter. You have to stick to your entry ideas, but also have to balls to go through with your play, and still know when to close your position.
I'm not a huge fan of fib numbers, elliot wave, astrology or whatever, but some guys are and do well from it, so I have no idea. Once again, you have to believe it to trade it. I don't believe in it, so even if I wanted too, I could never pull it off. I think a lot of people just do these as a magical remedy, even if they dont believe it. Good way to lose money imo.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moonshine
what are the startup costs for this like?
how much of a "bankroll" would someone need to start trading futures?
Well, I spend about $400 a month on software. As for a starting bankroll, it depends a lot on the security you're trading, and the system you're losing. I probably wouldn't start less then 20k if I was trading futures, just dipping in one contract at first.
Quote:
Originally Posted by econophile
AX, I don't want to hijack your thread, but I think your first point is basically an argument against a straw man.
I think many proponents of market efficiency would agree that competent day traders can beat a buy and hold strategy. In order to do so, however, they have to spend time workign at it (like a job) as well as aquire many valuable skills. So one's decision whether or not to become a day trader should not be based on whether they can beat the market. Rather it should be based on whether they will end up with more money day trading than they would taking up some other career (e.g. investment banking).
For sure. This **** is hard, and its more of an art then math. And yes, in terms of money optimisation, a decision must be made regarding skill sets. One thing though, learning about day trading and different market strategies is a great way to diversify your knowledge. I talked to a guy who heads a board for a large mutual fund here in Australia. He had no idea about day trading or any of the concepts I talked about. He was clueless, and I have no doubt if he had some elementary knowledge about stuff like short covering etc, he'd be much better at his job. My opinion, of course. There's a lot of pro day traders who don't really make that much, maybe like 80k a year or something, some even less.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaSpade
Art,
Great post...ty for the effort. Have already ordered Chick Goslin's book(thru your link, ofcourse) .... and would like to know what order of reading those books you'd suggest for a beginner.
Thanks.
The order I posted is probably the best. If I were doing it over, I'd just order one at a time, read, contemplate, then when I need more stimulation, order another till I get down the list