Still holding. This turbulence is nuts, though. I wish the market would decide what's it's worth already so we don't have to swing 5% a day on no news.
Still holding. This turbulence is nuts, though. I wish the market would decide what's it's worth already so we don't have to swing 5% a day on no news.
Still holding. This turbulence is nuts, though. I wish the market would decide what's it's worth already so we don't have to swing 5% a day on no news.
Or is it because of the market this year? I've had multiple stocks swing 5% each way everyday for at least the past week.
Or is it because of the market this year? I've had multiple stocks swing 5% each way everyday for at least the past week.
Probably a bit of both but LC swings way harder than anything else I own (tech heavy). And some days like today everything else I own goes one way and LC goes the other.
I was pitched the idea of P2P lending in 1998 and I thought it was a doomed idea and I still feel that way. P2P lending 1.0 imploded but after the relaunch it has done quite well. I think that is temporary. The environment is perfect for 2P2 lending right now so the timing is ideal for the IPO but I am sticking with once lending conditions return to normal these sites will implode.
They won't return to "normal". New regulations because of the banking crisis now restricts how banks can lend, so there will always be a niche for these kinds of lenders. If anything, they will grow.
They won't return to "normal". New regulations because of the banking crisis now restricts how banks can lend, so there will always be a niche for these kinds of lenders. If anything, they will grow.
I'm not American so I can't speak to regulations but I was thinking more of interest rates. There is a range of risk when it comes to lenders and as interest for safer borrowers increase obviously the rates to riskier borrowers also increase. The impact of this on p2p lending would be to have the safest borrowers currently using p2p to shift back to traditional lenders thus increasing the average risk of the p2p group as a whole. Simultaneously you have that remaining group paying higher servicing costs which also increases defaults.
Darn I was really meaning to short this but lost track over the last year or two, I was hating on it back in the 2014 trading thread too. I was just as pessimistic about fitbit about year ago too, oh well, live and learn. I really need to start doing some more long-term, out of the money options in cases like this.