Quote:
Originally Posted by Upupdowndown
Relax. My intention is not to dishonor you. I never called you a moron once. [Maybe you are referring to someone else?] What I said multiple times is that to assume like the quotes above is just plain wrong. It could happen, but to take it for granted, like many of your posts clearly do, is just wrong. And its important that some random guy (who already has a tendency to gamble obviously to be on the site) shouldnt see your posts and throw his money into a sure thing because you have given that speculative side as the obvious only outcome.
Also, there was basic information above that was incorrect that someone corrected. But all I've said is that to assume the gov't has no choice but to give up, is just false. Hence, the laughable side of "laughable/fraudulent".
This has been a good thread. You did great with the stock. Congrats. But originally i think you saw what it was- a speculative stock. If thats what you meant by "it can only go up" then we are cool. If you meant what your words say then we strongly disagree and I don't know where you are coming from.
Dont understand economic who has a longer johnson lines. I def don't know a lot about many sectors of the market (see my posts on commodities). FWIW, I happen to know my stuff on FNMA. But so what? Regardless, the posts above are still wrong. The important points why are pretty clear and have been expressed itt.
They will eventually be compelled to pay compensation for how they have handled the situation. If the government were to analyze the situation they would realize that the political and economic cost of keeping these companies in conservatorship is going to be way higher than the benefit of delaying the outcome is.
Even though there are now 6 lawsuits challenging the conservatorships, it is to use your word, dishonorable, for the government to wait for the outcome of that litigation to compel it to make a decision.
In many ways the consent of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac whether forced or not was a patriotic sacrifice for the greater good of the country. To argue that the GSE's were not absolutely essential in saving the rest of the financial system is completely opposed to the evidence.
The stonewalling on this situation by all the important parties is truly appalling in its unfairness. It is literally impossible to get any information at all about even a timeframe or plan for when these conservatorships will end. A simple statement such as "we will release them if this,this, and that happens" is impossible to get. The SEC is completely unresponsive. The FHFA is unresponsive. Even the companies themselves are unresponsive. The Treasury Secretary, Jack Lew has repeatedly dodged any questions about the intentions of Treasury in the situation.
I'd like to remind those people, including the SEC, that these are publicly traded companies. Conservatorship, or not, as a shareholder I am paying taxes when Fannie Mae in the most recent quarter started having taxable income. These companies are obligated to release all material information about their operations. If they cannot answer those questions under H.E.R.A. than the director of the F.H.F.A., Ed Demarco, has an obligation to add that information in the public financial filings. The acting director of the FHFA is given the power of the shareholders and board of directors, and all rights and RESPONSIBILITIES.
It is a responsibility for him to negotiate in the best interests of ALL parties and to disclose information that affects the ownership interests of ALL owners. Not just the taxpayer(government) owners.
Timely decision making and access to information is incredibly important from our government. The reason it is so important is because no one can quickly force them to answer a question or be responsive. Years can pass in which they can use their power and authority to dodge legitimate grievances. That is why it is so important for government officials to hold themselves to a HIGHER standard than regular people. To be proactive and to do the right thing before being forced to do it. Because almost powerless peoples lives and livelihoods can be wasted away when the government delays justice for the benefit of the time that comes from the delay.
Last edited by northeastbeast; 09-06-2013 at 02:38 PM.