Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
A dollar saved, a dollar spent A dollar saved, a dollar spent

05-13-2015 , 01:04 PM
I have recently started to engage with economics as a subject. It is complicated. The consequences of any economic action can be multifold and obscure. Hence, the question:

What is more useful for the US economy?

Is it better for me (as a US citizen for the sake of the example) to

a) save a $1 in a US bank account

or

b) spend a $1 on a US good or service?
A dollar saved, a dollar spent Quote
05-13-2015 , 01:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Al Mirpuri
I have recently started to engage with economics as a subject. It is complicated. The consequences of any economic action can be multifold and obscure. Hence, the question:

What is more useful for the US economy?

Is it better for me (as a US citizen for the sake of the example) to

a) save a $1 in a US bank account

or

b) spend a $1 on a US good or service?
More useful for the US economy? Spending money obvi, right?
A dollar saved, a dollar spent Quote
05-14-2015 , 08:06 PM
Pretty much impossible to answer without time frames. And even with a time frame, future circumstances will dictate the outcome

In brief, if your personal utility of the saved dollar at any point in the future exceeds the utility of spending it immediately, then saving is the superior choice.
A dollar saved, a dollar spent Quote
05-15-2015 , 12:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Al Mirpuri
I have recently started to engage with economics as a subject. It is complicated. The consequences of any economic action can be multifold and obscure. Hence, the question:

What is more useful for the US economy?

Is it better for me (as a US citizen for the sake of the example) to

a) save a $1 in a US bank account

or

b) spend a $1 on a US good or service?
Probably to save, as that money will be spent on cars, railroads, airplanes, factories, or large ticket items. Spending it will buy you an in-n-out burger and maybe some Nikes. It is probably better to spend on a foreign good. But in the end liberals will not let you save, as any money they see they will use government taxation and printing to take it. Then claim they are good. While claiming those they take the money from (the Koch brothers) as evil.
A dollar saved, a dollar spent Quote
05-15-2015 , 12:38 AM
If by useful OP means expand the US economy, then isn't this just a money-multiplier question. So it would be better to spend $1 vs save that $1?
A dollar saved, a dollar spent Quote
05-15-2015 , 08:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by apocalypse_fives
If by useful OP means expand the US economy, then isn't this just a money-multiplier question. So it would be better to spend $1 vs save that $1?
If expansion is the goal, saving is the answer. A dollar saved can be leveraged by a bank into 5 or more dollars in loans that are then spent.

Sent from my HTC6525LVW using 2+2 Forums
A dollar saved, a dollar spent Quote
05-15-2015 , 07:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TiggerToo
If expansion is the goal, saving is the answer. A dollar saved can be leveraged by a bank into 5 or more dollars in loans that are then spent.

Sent from my HTC6525LVW using 2+2 Forums
Here's a secret: banks don't even really need deposits to make loans.
A dollar saved, a dollar spent Quote
05-15-2015 , 08:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by samsonh
Here's a secret: banks don't even really need deposits to make loans.
LOL. They need reserves, set at a percentage of loans (and other financial instruments), so they want deposits. At least, retail banks that want to make loans do. Investment banks do not.

It's a lot more complex than that, of course, but I'm not trying to teach a course in banking here.

Sent from my HTC6525LVW using 2+2 Forums
A dollar saved, a dollar spent Quote
05-15-2015 , 08:19 PM
turn off your signature tigger
A dollar saved, a dollar spent Quote
05-16-2015 , 12:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TiggerToo
LOL. They need reserves, set at a percentage of loans (and other financial instruments), so they want deposits. At least, retail banks that want to make loans do. Investment banks do not.

It's a lot more complex than that, of course, but I'm not trying to teach a course in banking here.

Sent from my HTC6525LVW using 2+2 Forums
You shouldn't teach a course in banking. Because you do not understand the money creation system in America. I am more qualified to discuss this issue than you.
A dollar saved, a dollar spent Quote
05-16-2015 , 08:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by samsonh
You shouldn't teach a course in banking. Because you do not understand the money creation system in America. I am more qualified to discuss this issue than you.
We don't know each other, so a statement like that is foolish at best. I'm not taking the bait and I am certainly not interested in engaging in personal attacks.
A dollar saved, a dollar spent Quote
05-16-2015 , 09:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Al Mirpuri
I have recently started to engage with economics as a subject. It is complicated. The consequences of any economic action can be multifold and obscure. Hence, the question:

What is more useful for the US economy?

Is it better for me (as a US citizen for the sake of the example) to

a) save a $1 in a US bank account

or

b) spend a $1 on a US good or service?
Neither does anything productive, unless you spend it in a way that will allow you to be more productive.

But of course Keyensians will say b.
A dollar saved, a dollar spent Quote
05-16-2015 , 09:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TiggerToo
If expansion is the goal, saving is the answer. A dollar saved can be leveraged by a bank into 5 or more dollars in loans that are then spent.

Sent from my HTC6525LVW using 2+2 Forums
Creating money out of thin air doesn't actually produce anything valuable. It just makes it more expensive for those who wish to buy things. If the goal is to raise GDP for statistics sake, anything that increases inflation is a good thing.
A dollar saved, a dollar spent Quote
05-16-2015 , 10:41 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TomCollins
Creating money out of thin air doesn't actually produce anything valuable. It just makes it more expensive for those who wish to buy things. If the goal is to raise GDP for statistics sake, anything that increases inflation is a good thing.
I agree that if the money supply grows out of proportion with the underlying goods and services it represents, inflation is the result.

By definition in the US monetary system, money is created "out of thin air." Whether or not we should do it that way is a different question.
A dollar saved, a dollar spent Quote
05-18-2015 , 11:06 AM
Many thanks everyone for the replies.

I have learnt:

1. Economics is a difficult subject just as I thought.

2. The usefulness of my $1 depends upon (amongst other things I am sure) the good I wish to bring about.
A dollar saved, a dollar spent Quote
05-18-2015 , 08:37 PM
Sounds like what you're getting at is the absurdity of using GDP as a measure of economic well being, which it is on it's own.
A dollar saved, a dollar spent Quote
05-22-2015 , 02:28 PM
... It Depends...
A dollar saved, a dollar spent Quote
08-07-2015 , 10:26 PM
I have read some more economics and I now realize the value of a $1 spent or saved is dependent upon whatever specific good I wish to bring about. This understanding is itself a product of the theoretical approach accepted.
A dollar saved, a dollar spent Quote

      
m