Quote:
Originally Posted by onemoretimes
I never understood these devices. I guess I never read up on them, but wouldn't common sense be storing a decent amount of BTC on a small electronic device would be a bad idea? At the bare minimum the device could fail. I've had my fair share of computer hardware fail. Am I missing something why this seems like a terrible idea?
You can recover from a backup, you take a backup seed when you set it up.
The idea is any computer hooked up to the internet should be assumed to be infected. Trezor removes that layer, since it holds all of the private information and can sign transactions without giving up anything private.
Bitcoin are never stored on a device, just the keys to access them. As long as you have sufficient backup on the keys or ways to create the keys, your coins will never be lost. However, giving up that information means someone else can access them.
For holding significant holdings, I'd consider it. There's still risk, as you have no idea that what is actually on the device (software and hardware) is what they claim, and they could have access to all the keys that are generated in some deterministic way. There's always a risk.
I'd also be reluctant to use any kind of early version that hasn't been tested well. There's going to be corner cases they didn't think of and when you lose your coins, oops. I'm not a fan of the price point as well, unless you have a pretty big holdings (>10k?) or are completely incompetent, I'd say there are better options.