Quote:
Originally Posted by juan valdez
the problem with people defending bitcoin is that none of their points make sense. the only argument they have is consensus. just like evaluating art or baseball cards, the store of value component is pure consensus.
The same argument could be made for gold. Most of it's price is derived from consensus, not utility. And since many people want a product that to invest in that is not government controlled(as a hedge against ones that are government controlled), bitcoin makes for a pretty good option.
I'm not saying bitcoin should be worth 16k(or whatever it is today), but the fact that it's a technology that solved the double spend problem, is censorship resistant, fungible, anti fragile, nearly infinity divisible and has some of the smartest people working one(and auditing) it's code, I think it would ans should be something that is sought for the same reason folks want gold.