unless you know the GTO solutions to every single spot you can't possibly be able to judge any of that

Someone edit this to 'I'm bigger online' and it'll be even more fantastic.

The beast has entered the arena!

lol who is delusional. its clear u dont know anything about stars cashgames.

YouTube doesn't allow you to file these on behalf of 3rd parties, and I know firsthand that when you file DMCA takedowns (a similar sort of complaint), you have to prove that you are who you say you are.

I did not say it was going to happen. Both side would pay the fees/cost for arbitration services.

If the parties to a dispute agree to arbitration, and the particular subject matter under arbitration allows for judicial enforcement of an award, collection on an award is not too difficult if the losing party actually has assets.

Even if the underlying dispute is not something enforceable through the courts, i.e. collection of a gambling debt, there might the need for a non-judicial escrow somewhere. (Actually, altho I hate to go on a tangent off a tangent, the technology is available to escrow funding of a possible award on the blockchain, using a simple multi-signature requirement for release.)

99,

Well played my friend.

GTO theory in HS poker does not have the importance that you think it has, when you are playing a small number of hands against a small number of opponents that you have information on and can exploit more profitably based on said information, if you are good enough to do so that is.

Moreover, if GTO software assisted play (assuming that as you say this is what those guys do) is losing them money, then they better reevaluate their strategies pronto, as the margin of error with such a small number of hands is pretty thin.

what do you mean losing them money, it's not losing them money if they reached high stakes and are grinding it steadily...

should say, this is like side saddle, we can delete pictures later

Ike reached out to me with what seemed like a genuine apology. He obviously had a very big lapse in judgement and I truly hope he never does anything like it again. But regarding our dealings on the matter, I am done. Everyone is obviously entitled to have their own opinion of Ike(or me for that matter), but I am at peace with, and have forgiven him for what he did.

1. They reached high stakes under circumstances different than those we have now.

2. Define steadily.

3. ^

otb would fit the definition of steadily

When did poker become so gay?...props to Polk for attacking it...I don't like his methods though.

Liberals obv.

I mean.. if anyone deserves to be immune to this type of private info leakage, it sure as hell is not Doug Polk.

Would be hilarious if this backfired.

Of course not. He was a competitive wc3 player ffs.

Eh, he was allegedly involved in gang activity for quite awhile.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Pretty sure Doug and Jungle are cool now. They had a rough patch a couple years ago.

Amazing what romantic trot on the beach can do...

Not sure the etiquette of sticking to a ruling when afterwards/hindsight it's clearly wrong but berri if everyone reasonable says the ruling is wrong I think you (and Ben) should definitely look to reconsider. If you definitely should be owed, then collect stop saying you're done/don't expect to get paid etc. At this point I don't see how anyone can argue you're not owed the full amount (main reason being that reverse situation no way he doesn't collect the full amount..., especially as then you saying "I win/lose for rake" instead of "we" would be used as proof against etc) so if Ben is reasonable and honourable at all he should accept to change the ruling even if it was an agreed and fair arbitrator. Meaning he has the "right" but would be very morally dubious (at best) to stick with the ruling.




Kinda funny how this sorta all came up just because Ben said Alex Dreyfus didn't have a legit reason to do his dodgy "trade".

lmfao, was this ever confirmed real?