Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
WCGRider / Ben86 dispute.... WCGRider / Ben86 dispute....

09-04-2016 , 11:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loctus
If your life involves people you thought of as friends or acquaintances saying stuff like that to you or others, or you think that is normal and not extremely extraordinary, I suggest you re-think things.
Saying stuff like "I'm richer than you"? The horror. That's merely a statement of fact (assuming it's true), not an insult. And when you consider that they were drunk at the time, this could've been smoothed over once everyone was sober and had blown off some steam. Plus Doug has said he's never had someone treat him like that in his life...you've never been in a verbal, personal spat with someone? Really? I think it really takes away from the legitimacy of Doug's story because the hyperbole is real.
WCGRider / Ben86 dispute.... Quote
09-04-2016 , 11:23 PM
Two SHAE,

If you were in Ben's shoes, and Sauce won, would you let Berri off the hook just because he said 'gogo' ?

If I were in Ben's shoes there is absolutely no way I would let Berri off the hook had Sauce won, and no arbitrator would either. First sentence of that convo makes it super clear what Ben means:

[2015-12-06 21:06:31] Ben: I'm trying to get down a small xbook on sauce vs trueteller hu 8 game today

Think it through from other perspective. Sauce won, now Berri tries to get paid and says I thought we both bet on Sauce. They show it to arbitrator and Berri says his proof is that he said 'gogo'. Does it sound reasonable that anyone would call it a wash? That would seem the most ridiculous freeroll ever and noone would agree that he shouldn't pay.
WCGRider / Ben86 dispute.... Quote
09-04-2016 , 11:30 PM
How about an MMA fight to settle things?
WCGRider / Ben86 dispute.... Quote
09-04-2016 , 11:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Codecci
Two SHAE,

If you were in Ben's shoes, and Sauce won, would you let Berri off the hook just because he said 'gogo' ?

If I were in Ben's shoes there is absolutely no way I would let Berri off the hook had Sauce won, and no arbitrator would either. First sentence of that convo makes it super clear what Ben means:

[2015-12-06 21:06:31] Ben: I'm trying to get down a small xbook on sauce vs trueteller hu 8 game today

Think it through from other perspective. Sauce won, now Berri tries to get paid and says I thought we both bet on Sauce. They show it to arbitrator and Berri says his proof is that he said 'gogo'. Does it sound reasonable that anyone would call it a wash? That would seem the most ridiculous freeroll ever and noone would agree that he shouldn't pay.
Agreed, and given Berri would have been on the hook for payment if it happened that Sauce won, he should receive payment for trueteller winning otherwise he is being held liable but ben never is.
WCGRider / Ben86 dispute.... Quote
09-04-2016 , 11:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by icarus1234
Hey Doug,

Really big fan of yours. Just wanted to chime in and say even though I could see where Ben has freerolled you for the coaching, you probably shouldn't have included all the personal details.

It feels like Ben has some internal issues that he probably needs help with. We all have problems in our lives and no one's perfect, be the better man and let this go.
The thread is long at this point, I am not sure how much you have seen or read. But you do realize that Ben was the first one to bring up the personal details, in a way that was a complete lie that tried to make me look like a chump.

All my posts were business related until the "I guess we are going to do this post"

Last edited by WCGRider; 09-04-2016 at 11:56 PM.
WCGRider / Ben86 dispute.... Quote
09-04-2016 , 11:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by steelers21
Saying stuff like "I'm richer than you"? The horror. That's merely a statement of fact (assuming it's true), not an insult. And when you consider that they were drunk at the time, this could've been smoothed over once everyone was sober and had blown off some steam. Plus Doug has said he's never had someone treat him like that in his life...you've never been in a verbal, personal spat with someone? Really? I think it really takes away from the legitimacy of Doug's story because the hyperbole is real.
Trying to decide if this is serious.

Just because something is a fact you can't just say it. There are many things in life like that, its called understanding how be a human being.
WCGRider / Ben86 dispute.... Quote
09-05-2016 , 12:05 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Codecci
Two SHAE,

If you were in Ben's shoes, and Sauce won, would you let Berri off the hook just because he said 'gogo' ?

If I were in Ben's shoes there is absolutely no way I would let Berri off the hook had Sauce won, and no arbitrator would either. First sentence of that convo makes it super clear what Ben means:

[2015-12-06 21:06:31] Ben: I'm trying to get down a small xbook on sauce vs trueteller hu 8 game today

Think it through from other perspective. Sauce won, now Berri tries to get paid and says I thought we both bet on Sauce. They show it to arbitrator and Berri says his proof is that he said 'gogo'. Does it sound reasonable that anyone would call it a wash? That would seem the most ridiculous freeroll ever and noone would agree that he shouldn't pay.
It's about BERRI's intentions. If you don't believe that he was trying to freeroll, then there's no reason it shouldn't be a wash, regardless of the results.

Sure, if BERRI would have paid Ben in the event that Sauce won, then Ben should have to pay BERRI in the actual status quo. But I find it EXTREMELY hard to believe that BERRI would have been like "Oh, you meant this, I understand now, here's your 40k". I think he'd be arguing the bet was a wash. Which is why I think it was a genuine misunderstanding that wasn't any more Ben's fault than BERRI's, and that should be a wash.
WCGRider / Ben86 dispute.... Quote
09-05-2016 , 12:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by WCGRider
Trying to decide if this is serious.

Just because something is a fact you can't just say it. There are many things in life like that, its called understanding how be a human being.
How different is saying "I'm richer than you" than saying to other poker players who play HUNL "I'm the best in the world at HUNL"?

Last edited by Two SHAE; 09-05-2016 at 12:13 AM.
WCGRider / Ben86 dispute.... Quote
09-05-2016 , 12:15 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Two SHAE
How different is saying "I'm richer than you" than saying to other poker players who play HUNL "I'm the best in the world at HUNL"?

To me it's pretty much the exact same thing; you're putting yourself in a place elevated above others, for pretty much no reason. So it is ironic you have a problem with one thing but are frequently doing the other thing.
They are completely different.
WCGRider / Ben86 dispute.... Quote
09-05-2016 , 12:17 AM
the latter is only different because it's somewhat debatable, but it's equally abrasive, pointless bragging meant to boost your own ego.

And to be clear I'm really not trying to take sides here, I do feel like Doug got shorted in their interaction/business dealings
WCGRider / Ben86 dispute.... Quote
09-05-2016 , 12:19 AM
indeed completely different
WCGRider / Ben86 dispute.... Quote
09-05-2016 , 12:23 AM
Doug telling people how to "be a human being" is LOL. Extremely arrogant and disrespectful person that doesn't even realize it. Now all of a sudden he's backing down from the "bad reg" thing he started. He would giggle with his friends about it all the time and clearly in a demeaning way but now he decides to back track. If you're going to be the villain have a backbone for me one time. Don't backtrack cause you're getting heat.

Also saying " what is this high school?" when asked if he would fight Ben. Coming from the person that goes " omg you should have heard what Ben said about Phil Galfond" when it had nothing to do with the story. That is straight out of a teenage girl play book.

And Ben didn't get into personal stuff. All he said is you did your speech that the whole world has heard that you think you're the best hu player and you guys talked about it. You're the one that turned it really personal into all the details about the convo.

And most importantly why is everyone taking what Doug is saying as Gospel. His goal was clearly to try to ruin Bens image with the Phil Galfond stuff. I would not find it hard to believe he made up a bunch of other stuff. That was his whole goal. To ruin his reputation by bringing up anything and everything
WCGRider / Ben86 dispute.... Quote
09-05-2016 , 12:23 AM
thanks for the explanations fayth/ponty, you're being very helpful here, come again
WCGRider / Ben86 dispute.... Quote
09-05-2016 , 12:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Two SHAE
the latter is only different because it's somewhat debatable, but it's equally abrasive, pointless bragging meant to boost your own ego.

And to be clear I'm really not trying to take sides here, I do feel like Doug got shorted in their interaction/business dealings
I'm sure the only reason is because there's no plausible deniability there.
WCGRider / Ben86 dispute.... Quote
09-05-2016 , 12:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Two SHAE
the latter is only different because it's somewhat debatable, but it's equally abrasive, pointless bragging meant to boost your own ego.

And to be clear I'm really not trying to take sides here, I do feel like Doug got shorted in their interaction/business dealings
One is attacking another person and one is boasting. Totally different.
WCGRider / Ben86 dispute.... Quote
09-05-2016 , 12:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Two SHAE
It's about BERRI's intentions. If you don't believe that he was trying to freeroll, then there's no reason it shouldn't be a wash, regardless of the results.

Sure, if BERRI would have paid Ben in the event that Sauce won, then Ben should have to pay BERRI in the actual status quo. But I find it EXTREMELY hard to believe that BERRI would have been like "Oh, you meant this, I understand now, here's your 40k". I think he'd be arguing the bet was a wash. Which is why I think it was a genuine misunderstanding that wasn't any more Ben's fault than BERRI's, and that should be a wash.
But why would Ben believe him? It's impossible to interpret from that conversation that BERRI meant what he now claims he actually meant. Why do you think Ben wouldn't think that BERRI is trying to freeroll him, or say that 'if Trueteller won I would've paid you, thus you would've freerolled me and you have to pay because of that' ?
WCGRider / Ben86 dispute.... Quote
09-05-2016 , 12:32 AM
I'm amazed nobody can see the obvious here. It's time for a poll.
WCGRider / Ben86 dispute.... Quote
09-05-2016 , 12:40 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Codecci
But why would Ben believe him? Because he's a reasonable human being, and he knows that BERRI is a respected member of the high stakes community. If he was not, and Ben thought there was even a 1% chance he was trying to freeroll, then Ben would not have offered to make a 5+ figure wager with him It's impossible to interpret from that conversation that BERRI meant what he now claims he actually meant. Why do you think Ben wouldn't think that BERRI is trying to freeroll him, or say that 'if Trueteller won I would've paid you, thus you would've freerolled me and you have to pay because of that' ? The fact that BERRI didn't just take Ben's 40k when Ben tried to pay him is very relevant. It shows that clearly he has integrity, and therefore it's not unreasonable to conclude that he wasn't trying to freeroll Ben. Given that, I don't believe he should have been penalized in the event that Sauce won, and therefore he should not receive reward in the actual situation where Trueteller won
uhh, we can just agree to disagree at this point, but will answer your questions in line. I understand your point and I don't think you're an idiot, I just don't agree with you. As I said, this is not a court of law, it's a unique and nuanced community with a lot of relationships and implicit trust built in.
WCGRider / Ben86 dispute.... Quote
09-05-2016 , 12:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Two SHAE
How different is saying "I'm richer than you" than saying to other poker players who play HUNL "I'm the best in the world at HUNL"?
Context and tone are important. "I'm the best in the world at HUNL" said in a flippant way is different than saying "I'm richer than you" with a serious tone. If there was banter going on that also changes things. We don't know the details so it's hard to say.
WCGRider / Ben86 dispute.... Quote
09-05-2016 , 12:52 AM
Arbitration never works out in poker because it isn't actually binding. In the real world you sign enforced contracts based on the arbitration.

In the poker world you have two major issues. The first being all the top guys are all friends so there is no impartial judge. Second, there is no enforcement so if the decision made isn't liked then the person just backs out of the arbitration.

For example, I was once an arbiter and ruled against a HS player. That player then called me an idiot for my ruling, backed out of the arbitration, then challenged me to prop bet that different judges (his friends) would have ruled differently than me.

As far as the berri sweet cross book situation goes it's a hard position because we don't know what berri does if sauce had won. If he would have paid, would ben have accepted the money? If so, ben was freerolling berri.
WCGRider / Ben86 dispute.... Quote
09-05-2016 , 12:54 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Two SHAE
It's about BERRI's intentions. If you don't believe that he was trying to freeroll, then there's no reason it shouldn't be a wash, regardless of the results.

Sure, if BERRI would have paid Ben in the event that Sauce won, then Ben should have to pay BERRI in the actual status quo. But I find it EXTREMELY hard to believe that BERRI would have been like "Oh, you meant this, I understand now, here's your 40k". I think he'd be arguing the bet was a wash. Which is why I think it was a genuine misunderstanding that wasn't any more Ben's fault than BERRI's, and that should be a wash.
This 100%.

I'm actually surprised Berri wanted arbitration at all. He must've thought he was out 20K but turns out he mis-understood what exactly he was betting on and was actually owed 40K. Thus I now see how the 2nd arbitrator came to the conclusion they did.

If you want to call out Ben for mishandling the situation that's understandable. But because we are not yet robots and are still unfortunately human, intention is what matters here.
WCGRider / Ben86 dispute.... Quote
09-05-2016 , 12:58 AM
Wow it's so rare to have such an entertaining thread about multiple long time very well known players. I wonder how many people are out there like me who read this thread that don't care at this point about any new online players, but clearly remember Ben as an OG who rose up from 2/4 in 2008 and 5/10 an 10/20 in 2009 to nosebleeds.

I remember in 2009 or 2010, nycballer in the HSNL thread implied Ben was a bumhunter, Ben responded and said that was "extremely offensive" and nycballer loled and said dude calm down this is the Internet. No response from Ben on that one.
WCGRider / Ben86 dispute.... Quote
09-05-2016 , 01:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BERRI SWEET

[2015-12-06 21:06:31] Ben: I'm trying to get down a small xbook on sauce vs trueteller hu 8 game today
[2015-12-06 21:06:34] Ben: lmk if you want to have a gamble

[2015-12-06 21:26:10] Ben: theyre doing winner pays rake today btw
[2015-12-06 21:27:08] BERRI SWEET: So if I lose I dont pay 50% of the rake, but if I win I pay 100% of it?
[2015-12-06 21:27:18] Ben: yeah
[2015-12-06 21:27:23] BERRI SWEET: Cool
Based on these 2 parts of the conversation I find it very hard to believe that Ben would ever let BERRI out of the bet. Ben says he is looking for a small xbook, clearly looking to book it with BERRI and not split a 100% crossbook against trueteller.

Then BERRI says "if I lose" and not "if we lose". I'm quite confused how BERRI thought he was betting with Ben. Even his own wording makes it seem like he is betting against Ben in the crossbook.
WCGRider / Ben86 dispute.... Quote
09-05-2016 , 01:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrOlson
Based on these 2 parts of the conversation I find it very hard to believe that Ben would ever let BERRI out of the bet. Ben says he is looking for a small xbook, clearly looking to book it with BERRI and not split a 100% crossbook against trueteller.

Then BERRI says "if I lose" and not "if we lose". I'm quite confused how BERRI thought he was betting with Ben. Even his own wording makes it seem like he is betting against Ben in the crossbook.
BERRI made a bet on something other than what he thought he was. Then ran good and won the bet. He should be able to collect his winnings even if he made the winning bet by accident. Any hypothetical scenarios on what happens if he lost should be irrelevant.
WCGRider / Ben86 dispute.... Quote
09-05-2016 , 01:32 AM
This berri not so sweet situation all could've been avoided if berri didn't say anything at all after he found out he won the bet..

Quote:
Originally Posted by IPlayNLHE
Why would the solution to this being Doug and Ben losing their rolls to Riess?
yeah I honestly was hoping that ben and doug were delusional enough to think they could win money off Riess the Beast because I believe he is the only person in this day in age of poker, that his intentions are truly great.
WCGRider / Ben86 dispute.... Quote

      
m