You should have just wrote the last sentence instead of trying to paint yourself as an innocent observer who hasn't read any of the thread but has decided to chime in on the issue.

Since I remember your screen name and you run stakes all the time on the site. Maybe you should read the thread so that you have the information you need to make the last sentence. If it were "much ado about nothing" how could you really know that if you haven't read any of the information in this thread that contains most of the information to be able to come to that conclusion.

If you're going to pile on in defense of the issues being discussed blindly you might want to stop using the deceptive stance of being an innocent party to the conversation and admit your extensive use of the staking site.

un
be
li
ev
ab
le

Yep you really tied that up in neat little bow. Like when they ask you to tie the ribbon for the finish line at your Special Olympics races.

Maybe in your world just making statements is considered discussing an issue.

dude you really need to stop. You aren't accomplishing anything.

You almost wrote four complete sentences here. Amazing. I'm proud of you. The feeling I have right now must be the same feeling when the first person walked upright. The similarity's to that moment in history and the entire content and slant of what you have written in your posts are incredible.

Can you grade my midterm paper for me too please? You stopped arguing your ridiculous topic and now are just bashing people for the grammatical errors?

Im going to bed, you are an idiot.

I wasn't talking about your sentence structure. I was talking about you using those sentences to actually discuss the issue in anything close to a fair way.

That email was written to me personally. They changed the rules and they did it within the last day or two.

this debate brings me back to the 7th grade when a girl argued that if abortion is legal, then everyone would be doing it; and that since it is, we are the last generation to survive. good read, thanks for the memories op

you all got leveled imo.
op is ptp.
wp sir.

Maybe if it was free they would do it more. Or if they drove to your house and did the abortions even more would be done. If they payed the women 10,000 dollars even more would do it. Eventually with enough incentives you could overcome almost every objection depending on what was offered.

In the situation of staking having stakes where the incentives are geared toward softplay and the risk(or perceived risk) of getting caught is low people are more likely to do it.

I'd like to thank you too for the memories. ha.

lol

think you totally missed the point of what part of the argument i missed. but I'm guessing that's a reoccurring theme in this thread.

this...

You talked about a girl saying that if abortion is made legal that everyone would have them and the generation that was allowed to have them would abort all their children making them the last generation to survive.

Yes you are right I don't understand how this relates to the issue of collusion in staking or my opinion that staking sites using poker accounts to collect revenue for their business violates Stars terms of service.

You are right about me missing the point of "of what part of the argument you missed" as you haven't made clear whose argument you are even referencing and how your story relates to that unspecified argument.