Quote:
Originally Posted by gobbo
The prelims were absolutely brutal. The TD there basically just follows the rulebook to the letter and doesn't let anyone make any calls whatsoever based on judgment.
This doesn't seem like a valid complaint. Rules are rules. If you think rules should be changed, thats one thing. But to complain that the TD wasn't willing to bend or break rules - that doesn't seem like a good thing to me. Once the rules are written, I think strict adherence is the best policy. Otherwise you just get into worse problems of unfair/inconsistent application where some players get away with stuff that others don't.
do you have an example or something as to a specific situation where you thought that a dealer/director should have allowed a rule to be broken? Or did you just mean that they have some silly rules or oversized punishments in place that should have never been there in the first place?