Harvester,

Thanks for your efforts, and I think your idea would be great for the community. I also agree with you that most do not care anymore, and I feel like giving up. UB or the KGC will not make good and nothing will come of this scandal, just like the AP scandal. I wish you the best of luck, and **** Paul. He is a pawn and a liar anyway.

I am still wondering why Russ Hamilton would send Nat down to investigate AP, but then asked not to be named. It makes me wonder about Nat's Costa Rica report and whether he was just fed B.S. by AP and Paul to make it go away, so nobody would look at UB. I mean Nat's report shows Scott Tom was basically guilty, but Paul Leggett's video interview basically said Scott Toms IP was used. I find it hard to believe after going back to Nat's trip report. Just more lies and cover-ups by AP/UB.

Dank, sorry I wasn't home, PM me next time instead of posting. I have finished with the Annie Duke interviews, but I may not post the anything. You quoted a main part, good job for that. However, as Harvester mentioned, most people do not care anymore, so even if I do post the discrepancies In all her interviews, I feel like it won't matter.

F- UB/AP/KGC/Russ Hamilton/Paul L/Joe Norton/C. Heick/ and others, You will get yours at some point.

All good and all I can say is "I tried" and leave it at that. Don't hard time Nat too much he is a solid guy and down that path leads only frustrations. I believe him to be honest to a fault, and in this industry that is hard to find - especially in online poker which is fraught with douche bags of the highest caliber. He even made good on the bet I made with him in the bar in Costa Rica on Monday Night football on the way to the airport, giving me one of his ridiculously dry de-humidified bills...that still sits on my desk and is still like a late autumn leaf. I think he gave his best analysis of what he was shown....probably like the BMM analysis of what they are given, the sample and validity against the true information may be suspect - however the results are more than likely done in good faith. You know two sets of books etc.

Thanks again.