Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffmet3
haha, i'm certainly not on his nuts, what he did was wrong and i'm not defending him. you, however, are living in some fantasyland where sites take some moral high ground and dole out harsh penalties and there's no point in my wasting my time telling you that you're wrong anymore after this.
tons of people have done unethical things and after the initial uproar dies down, people's mention or caring about it slowly goes away
1. im not taking the moral high ground. what im doing is looking at sites TOS and realizing that if someone has for so long had so many accounts and used them all at the same time, AND realized that what he was doing was wrong enough to hide, that person is not very likely to be able to play on those sites anymore.
2. yep, people do often get forgiven for doing wrong things, however the sites do not forget so easily. are you forgetting what happened zeejustin for breaking the rules? he was forgiven by the 2+2 community long before stars forgave him. altho imo its a very different situation since stox is a grown man and has played poker far longer
Quote:
Originally Posted by dear23
I think it's too funny that so many replies are only conserned about Leatherass. WTF does LA have to do with anything? What "mystery reason"? what happened is his good friends started a new site and gave him a better deal.
Let's stick to Stox here instead shall we? It disturbs me that Stox didn't just deny having any of the mentioned screennames.
im not concerned about LA more than stox. all i have been doing is defending my original assertion that perhaps this has something to do with why LA so suddenly up and left stox. this was called "******ed" and i asked why.
obviously this has way more to do with stox than it does with LA, but i cannot see how my assertion is ******ed.