Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Ray Bitar (FTP CEO) Surrenders to US Government - Confirmed by DOJ Ray Bitar (FTP CEO) Surrenders to US Government - Confirmed by DOJ

07-03-2012 , 04:02 AM
i predict a rigtard revolution on 2p2 after this case finishes
07-03-2012 , 04:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tercet
54. Bitar, Burtnick, and defendants shall forfeit.. blah blahblah ( cliffs - everything they own)
54a. A sum of money of at least 2.5$ billion in US currency.

hahahahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhahahaha
I actually had to go through the document myself because I simply could not believe the number $2,500,000,000. Amazing that they have to forfeit at least $2.5bn and only $390m is owed to players.

If they had anywhere near that sum of money combined why couldn't they just pay for that out of their own pocket and make this whole thing go away?
07-03-2012 , 04:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ashinynickel
I actually had to go through the document myself because I simply could not believe the number $2,500,000,000. Amazing that they have to forfeit at least $2.5bn and only $390m is owed to players.

If they had anywhere near that sum of money combined why couldn't they just pay for that out of their own pocket and make this whole thing go away?
Just because you want something doesn't mean that it exists.
07-03-2012 , 04:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by molinn9
any short cliffs like about Howard and Chris are they also in simular situation as Bitar
Not yet. Hopefully soon.
07-03-2012 , 04:28 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Byrung
The $20,000 in full tilt money I bought for $500 might look like a good deal instead of a dumb drunken moment
LoL,

noone who's capable of playing poker with a 20k roll is going to release it for a mere $500.

That's like someone with a $100 roll stuck on FT saying they will release it for like $2 or $3. I'd rather just ride it out and wait for such a small percentage.

Stop talking crap.
07-03-2012 , 04:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gioco
It will be fascinating to watch how this plays out. I believe the script has already been written.
Care to venture an educated guess as to what that script may say?
07-03-2012 , 04:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Do it Right
For many people their bankroll wasn't just $, but their means of earning more money. Stealing that and then giving it back more than a year later is far from a victimless crime. It's analogous to firing somebody for a year for some sort of corrupt or criminal reason, giving them their job back a year later and saying: "Ok, we're even now." Obviously ridiculous there, and it's equally obvious here. Not to mention I'm sure the money will also be returned without interest and we'll be lucky be compensated for our non-liquid assets such as bonuses/points/medals.

Give me fair compensation in exchange for profits lost, mental anguish as well as a reasonable level of interest and some hefty punitive damages on top of all of that and then we can call it a victimless fairly compensated crime.
I agree. The 17k give or take that they owe me now I feel should be in the neighborhood of 30+. Not gonna happen though that's how the real world works
07-03-2012 , 05:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by oneonth3run
Care to venture an educated guess as to what that script may say?
The obvious guess is Bitar takes the fall for everyone does a couple of years in jail,Stars pays the DOJ loads of money to be clear of legal problems and pay off FT players and Preet Bharara gives a big press conference lauding how he took down those evil illegal gambling companies and hopes noone notices that most of the major players walked.
07-03-2012 , 05:17 AM
So does this mean PS and full tilt are coming back to the US anytime soon?
07-03-2012 , 05:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by friendlyman
i predict a rigtard revolution on 2p2 after this case finishes
check the probability forum for a thread titled

52 factorial and action community cards/whole cards

kind of an eye opener on the possibilities of a 52 card deck^ try out the various examples

cheers,
Feel
07-03-2012 , 05:57 AM
So in 2010-11 the US Govt was clamping downheavily on payment processors, making it increasingly problematic for FTP & PokerStars players in the US players to fund their accounts.

However, PokerStars seemed to be able to function pretty adequately prior to Black Friday, whereas FTP instead chose to resort to fraud.

Which begs the question, how was PokerStars able to get round those same payment processor problems?
07-03-2012 , 06:01 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Haystacks
Which begs the question, how was PokerStars able to get round those same payment processor problems?
If the numbers are correct and the top brass at FTP pocketed hundreds of millions each, it may be that PokerStars simply didn't pay themselves as handsomely.
07-03-2012 , 06:08 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roscoe123
So does this mean PS and full tilt are coming back to the US anytime soon?
the events that are unfolding as of lately are laying the foundation for the possible re-entry of PS/FT into US soil. imho

it's only a matter of time and i do not know the exact date bud.
07-03-2012 , 06:08 AM
Apologies for not posting ITT yesterday, but I made conscious decisions how best to spend my time, which made it less possible to be here. I think most questions have already been answered, will try to catch up
07-03-2012 , 06:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ashinynickel
If the numbers are correct and the top brass at FTP pocketed hundreds of millions each, it may be that PokerStars simply didn't pay themselves as handsomely.
Well, we all know they were robbing the players like that. But they were apparently also finding it almost impossible simply to get US player's deposits into their FTP accounts. Weren't PS in the exact same boat in that regard?
07-03-2012 , 06:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Haystacks
So in 2010-11 the US Govt was clamping downheavily on payment processors, making it increasingly problematic for FTP & PokerStars players in the US players to fund their accounts.

However, PokerStars seemed to be able to function pretty adequately prior to Black Friday, whereas FTP instead chose to resort to fraud.

Which begs the question, how was PokerStars able to get round those same payment processor problems?
Pokerstars stopped floating echecks, FTP was willing to float the bad deposits to try and gain market share I guess.
07-03-2012 , 06:16 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimAfternoon
Pokerstars stopped floating echecks, FTP was willing to float the bad deposits to try and gain market share I guess.
OK thx. So how were US PokerStars players actually funding their accounts in early 2011?
07-03-2012 , 06:19 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diamond_Flush
Apologies for not posting ITT yesterday, but I made conscious decisions how best to spend my time, which made it less possible to be here. I think most questions have already been answered, will try to catch up
is a deal between stars and doj will be announce in the next 7 days?
07-03-2012 , 06:22 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tamiller866
He hired Judge Kaplan's former lawfirm to represent him (recuse?), these new charges are all based on 'fraud' that will have no victims once the PS agreement goes through, so this whole show of shock and awe is a complete orchestration to get passed having to face Judge Kaplan when they drop/non-prosecute/delay-prosecute Scheinberg's case.

Not only is this not 'bad' for our chances of getting repaid, this is a blatant signal that the DOJ is moving full steam ahead, while I'd give Bitar some credit for having the balls to turn himself in, I have no doubt the whole boarding the plane and request to deny bail was for show.

The DOJ has it's headline arrest, throw in getting players repaid and nobody will bat an eyelid when Isai gets a free pass.
Just to be clear, I am pretty sure that if Kaplan must recuse himself as I suggested, he would only be doing so as it relates to Bitar, and there is no reason to believe he wouldn't continue to be the one on the bench for any other defendants (assuming the same conflict didn't exist for them). As to this being the only motive for Bitar to hire Baughman, keep in mind that there is no way of knowing who he might draw from the pool for a new judge. He could conceivably do worse.

As to the DOJ/FBI's handling of "putting on the show", I couldn't agree more. Bitar obviously agreed to be taken in voluntarily already, with or without new charges.

As to the aforementioned "free pass" there is no reason to suspect that is anything more than a rumor at vthis point.
07-03-2012 , 06:23 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Haystacks
OK thx. So how were US PokerStars players actually funding their accounts in early 2011?
Once they stopped taking echecks, there were a few prepaid cards that still worked. I remember reloading once near the end and it was hard, I had to try 2 or 3 cards before I got one that worked.
07-03-2012 , 06:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by gabbkk
is a deal between stars and doj will be announce in the next 7 days?
possibly. let's just have a little more patience during this time.

we've all shown patience and been through tough times as online poker players this past year.

i pray that everything get's turned in the right direction sooner or later regarding the current status of online poker.
07-03-2012 , 06:31 AM
DF, I'm curious to know what you think PS motivation is in buying FT?
07-03-2012 , 06:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roscoe123
So does this mean PS and full tilt are coming back to the US anytime soon?
No.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ashinynickel
I actually had to go through the document myself because I simply could not believe the number $2,500,000,000. Amazing that they have to forfeit at least $2.5bn and only $390m is owed to players.

If they had anywhere near that sum of money combined why couldn't they just pay for that out of their own pocket and make this whole thing go away?
The $2.5B number everyone is jumping on is just the combination of the DOJ estimates for FTP ($1B) and PS ($1.5B) gross US revenues, with no allowance for expenses.

The actual interesting thing in the indictment is that SDNY is now laying the $1.5B for PokerStars on Butnick, for his role from 2006-2007, likely to make it easier (politically) for them to give PS a walk.

Quote:
(1) With respect to Count Three, the operation of Full Tilt Poker, at least approximately $1 billion in U.S.

currency; (2) With respect to Count Eleven, the operation of PokerStars, at least approximately $1.5 billion in U.S.
Quote:
COUNT TEN (Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act: PokerStars) The Grand Jury further charges:NELSON BURTNICK, the defendant, a person engaged in the business of betting and wagering and persons aiding and abetting persons in the business of betting and wagering, did knowingly accept, in connection with the participation of another person in unlawful internet gambling, to wit, gambling through PokerStars
Quote:
COUNT ELEVEN (Operation of an Illegal Gambling Business: PokerStars) The Grand Jury further charges:NELSON BURTNICK, the defendant, willfully and knowingly did conduct, finance, manage, supervise, direct, and own all and part of an illegal gambling business, namely ... operated and aided and abetted the operation of Pokerstars.
07-03-2012 , 06:40 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ivvaen
Amazing turn of events. Havent seen this mentioned yet though:



Source

He may not have had a choice either way.
While we do not know what plans DOJ ever had/has for extradition in this case, I'll take issue with Devlin-Brown not really saying what this says. What he did say to the judge, was that there are problems with extradition laws in some countries(presumably including ireland) because of the issues relating to the requisite dual criminality features of some extradition treaties, (which we, as mere laypersons, have discussed for a year on this forum). I never heard him say "we were going after him anyway" or anything similar (I would be happy to change my opinion on this when someone gets the transcript).

What he did say was with regard to his request for denial of bond, as they (USAO) foresee those same potential issues with extradition in other places if Bitar were to flee. I thought it was pretty odd that a prosecutor would say on the record in court, that they have problems bringing these ppl in via extradition. Not that it matters is someone were to flee, but this bordereed on saying "well done guys, now we can't get you"?
07-03-2012 , 06:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by zoomie123
DF, I'm curious to know what you think PS motivation is in buying FT?
Money

      
m