Recently UB appears to be rebranding their sites and utilising hundreds of domains. This unfortunatly is having the effect of
pushing links about the AP/UB scandal down the search rankings in Google.
I don't think anyone has tried this yet, but I think it would be beneficial for potential customers/visitors to UB domains, as well as improve the damaged reputation of the poker community as a whole:
It is my beleif that UB are running dangerous websites hosting software that has the potential to cause real harm to users, and that visitors to those websites are at risk. We have a lot of supporting evidence gathered relentlessly by many users to back up this claim. So far, there is nothing/very little to suggest that UB are now a clean act, so it is my belief that users should be warned about this.
We have a lot of objective supporting evidence, and witnesses who have suffered significant monetary losses.
So how do we go about
warning potential customers that these websites put them at risk?
If it is your opinion that the UB domains host dangerous software and put visitors at risk, then you may feel like filling out a form on Google:
"Please complete the form below to report a site that you suspect contains malicious software."
http://www.google.com/safebrowsing/report_badware/
This would show a notification similar to this one:

Whenever a visitor visits the reported domains.
If enough people feel that UB is hosting malicious software, then Google may class the domains as dangerous and warn users when they use the site, thus completing our objective of warning users of a website that could cause them harm, although it may take many hundreds of requests for this to happen. If you do submit a form, pointing Google to some objective information on the matter may help them make a decision.
The motive here is not to damage their business (although this may be a consequence of peoples actions here), but to warn users about the risks they are taking when visiting those domains by exploiting public tools that Google offers for such instances.
I would also urge that users don't suggest 'template' responses to send on forms such as this, as these can quickly be disregarded by the authority. Unique reports from a wide global user base will support the issue more than a thousand copied and pasted reports.
Thoughts?