Two Plus Two Publishing LLC Two Plus Two Publishing LLC
 

Go Back   Two Plus Two Poker Forums > General Poker Discussion > News, Views, and Gossip

Notices

News, Views, and Gossip For poker news, views, and gossip

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-05-2010, 07:36 PM   #16
veteran
 
hammer_time's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,793
Re: Possibly superusers on Cake -- Lee Jones/Cake refusing to respond

Next up, Pokerstars base being run from a council estate flat.
hammer_time is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2010, 07:36 PM   #17
journeyman
 
nilesz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 353
Re: Possibly superusers on Cake -- Lee Jones/Cake refusing to respond

Quote:
Originally Posted by hobokes View Post
My default is to trust Lee. He'll come through.
So far his replies are in UB style, I don't understand why he destroys his reputation like this.
nilesz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2010, 07:39 PM   #18
old hand
 
calvinzorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,763
Re: Possibly superusers on Cake -- Lee Jones/Cake refusing to respond

I'm a regular at the 2/4-5/10 NL 6max games for bout a year now, and fwiw I haven't noticed anything weird in these games, such as a player winning way above a normal win rate, while playing a losing style.

I think I'm going to keep playing on cake and give them a chance to clear their name, their support has always been good.

mrrpb's post does bother me though.

Oh and I'll ship $20 on FT to the person who provides the best/most thorough cliffnotes from the Official Cake Feedback Thread about this whole fiasco. They should post it here.
calvinzorr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2010, 07:42 PM   #19
adept
 
jmrd27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Montreal
Posts: 1,131
Re: Possibly superusers on Cake -- Lee Jones/Cake refusing to respond

Here's the response from Lee Jones to your questions:

██████████████████████████████████████████████████ █████████████████████████

███████████████
████████████████████

██████████████████████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████████████████████ █████████████████████████


██████████
jmrd27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2010, 07:44 PM   #20
banned
 
mrrpb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,596
Re: Possibly superusers on Cake -- Lee Jones/Cake refusing to respond

Quote:
Originally Posted by ekky View Post
my first job after leaving Uni was with the biggest FX currency marketmaker in the world, and the offices looked exactly like that. Most of the important backend stuff happens out the way, and the rest occurs in the cheapasshyte front office. They wont really need a fancy front office to host their skeletal support department, especially if the important stuff is elsewhere. Its probably just to have a European liscence or sommat like that.
I don't believe so. There's other poker sites operating out of Ireland, FTP is probably the biggest and I know merge, or at least a few skins on merge, do too. FTP don't have a crappy basement office to run out of!

Remember, it's not the whole building we're talking about. It's a 2 room flat in the basement. I'm not 100% sure where their servers are located. I got the impression that their operation in Canada is tiny though, and that they've a very small number of programmers.

Quote:
Originally Posted by hammer_time View Post
Wow.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hammer_time View Post
Next up, Pokerstars base being run from a council estate flat.
Lol In one of those videos Chiren80 posted, he visited Stars' office and it looked pretty nice judging by the reception anyway.

Also, another note that people might deem relevant. The security staff and customer service staff worked on a on/off basis where one would work in their tiny office, the other would work from the comfort of home. They were given whatever software they needed (full access to the security mainframe one would assume anyway) and could work away, presumably unmonitored, at home.

I dunno if that's a common "benefit" to working for an online poker site so it might be nothing. But access to security software along with some privacy and one or two internet connections and one could possibly do a lot of damage.
mrrpb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2010, 07:45 PM   #21
old hand
 
calvinzorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,763
Re: Possibly superusers on Cake -- Lee Jones/Cake refusing to respond

I also have prob 300k-500k hands of mid stakes on cake I'm willing to contribute if a 2p2 investigation does occur.
calvinzorr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2010, 07:49 PM   #22
banned
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2,261
Re: Possibly superusers on Cake -- Lee Jones/Cake refusing to respond

FTP have a couple of levels in a (admittedly more pleasant) buildng south of dublin in the cherrywood estate, near the starbucks. Its no great entity itself! plus they have their pocketkings operation running out of there as well, so they would likely need a more substantial place.

I realise Im coming across as a pro-cake shill, and I dont want that, just wanted to speak from my own experience of how one leg of a corporate shell isn't evident of the entire model.
ekky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2010, 07:49 PM   #23
old hand
 
calvinzorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,763
Re: Possibly superusers on Cake -- Lee Jones/Cake refusing to respond

Wouldnt this thread be better in Internet Poker than NGV?
calvinzorr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2010, 07:50 PM   #24
veteran
 
Flip-Flop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,168
Re: Possibly superusers on Cake -- Lee Jones/Cake refusing to respond

Quote:
Originally Posted by calvinzorr View Post
I also have prob 300k-500k hands of mid stakes on cake I'm willing to contribute if a 2p2 investigation does occur.
That's great but with the SN changes and stuff, what is there to investigate :/
Flip-Flop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2010, 07:53 PM   #25
old hand
 
calvinzorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,763
Re: Possibly superusers on Cake -- Lee Jones/Cake refusing to respond

True that, I forgot people show up as for example,

calv******
Flip****
LeeJ****

on the cake hand histories
calvinzorr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2010, 07:54 PM   #26
grinder
 
NANONUTS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Untiltable
Posts: 469
Re: Possibly superusers on Cake -- Lee Jones/Cake refusing to respond

Quote:
Originally Posted by █████ View Post
That was our default too, but Lee has been ignoring every serious question while responding to a few easy unrelated questions and making his Cake Poker announcements. He has stonewalled us on even the simple timeline issue.
Well here's how it is - If Lee Jones walks now Cake is ruined. But Lee Jones reputation is worth alot to him. The way I see it, Cake have opened up the chequebook and he has been made an offer he can't refuse not to walk. Everybody has a price. I can't see why else he wouldn't be out the door at this stage, he is in an impossible situation and his reputation is going further downhill every single day.
NANONUTS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2010, 07:55 PM   #27
banned
 
mrrpb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,596
Re: Possibly superusers on Cake -- Lee Jones/Cake refusing to respond

Quote:
Originally Posted by ekky View Post
FTP have a couple of levels in a (admittedly more pleasant) buildng south of dublin in the cherrywood estate, near the starbucks. Its no great entity itself! plus they have their pocketkings operation running out of there as well, so they would likely need a more substantial place.

I realise Im coming across as a pro-cake shill, and I dont want that, just wanted to speak from my own experience of how one leg of a corporate shell isn't evident of the entire model.
FTP also have a much better HR/employment model too
mrrpb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2010, 07:56 PM   #28
banned
 
mrrpb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,596
Re: Possibly superusers on Cake -- Lee Jones/Cake refusing to respond

Quote:
Originally Posted by NANONUTS View Post
Well here's how it is - If Lee Jones walks now Cake is ruined. But Lee Jones reputation is worth alot to him. The way I see it, Cake have opened up the chequebook and he has been made an offer he can't refuse not to walk. Everybody has a price. I can't see why else he wouldn't be out the door at this stage, he is in an impossible situation and his reputation is going further downhill every single day.
Indeed. I alluded to this in the other thread stickied at the top a minute ago.

It's quite plausible that he's either been given said offer, or when he joined Cake he was handed a **** ton of shares in the network and is protecting his investment by trying to maintain the status quo. If he walks, bye bye cake and presumably bye bye share-value/investment-value.
mrrpb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2010, 07:56 PM   #29
grinder
 
NANONUTS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Untiltable
Posts: 469
Re: Possibly superusers on Cake -- Lee Jones/Cake refusing to respond

When it comes to encryption SSL is the default (and highly regarded industry standard) option. You have to have reason for not picking the default option. What reason did Cake have???
NANONUTS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2010, 07:56 PM   #30
banned
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2,261
Re: Possibly superusers on Cake -- Lee Jones/Cake refusing to respond

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrrpb View Post
FTP also have a much better HR/employment model too
yeah its pretty awesome, its a shame the support of FTP is so shyte because the rest of it is the greatest I've ever heard of by a coutry mile! Anywyas, enough of the derail.
ekky is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply
      

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2008-2010, Two Plus Two Interactive