Quote:
Originally Posted by steelers21
Hey, maybe they do care about their live product after all, even if it's only a little bit.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
I think they got too full of themselves as dominant market leaders so thought they could make any changes they wanted to while viewing players as mere statistics on a balance sheet and taking them for granted.
This IMO was overlooking the culture of the game which is that for most on line players and all live players there is a desire to at some stage experience some glory in the live arena and to win a trophy of a respected and instantly recognisable brand.
So by committing virtual hari-kare with their live brand by tossing away a super strong brand name, holding events in outpost locations, messing with payout structures and therefore creating situations where fields in some side events were tiny or non existent, they've damaged much of the allure of playing in live MTTs that are run by Pokerstars.
This is not to mention them presumably also overlooking the practicalities of players attending events. Field sizes simply have to be big to make a trophy worthwhile fighting for, and more importantly to justify a player paying the massive extra "juice" of travel costs and expenses.
You have to play very well and run pretty decent and finish quite high up in the money in ~1 in 3 tournaments just to make a tiny profit or break even on an overseas trip after all expenses. Plus some people are not full time pros so are taking time off work or business to play which is effectively an extra cost.
So if field sizes start to contract, pay structures flatten meaning it's even harder to have a profitable trip, and tour locations become more obscure places that you wouldn't really want to go to or may even want to avoid, then it is and should have been obvious that it is killing the success of their live poker tour.
They should probably switch back to their previous live poker model and then add to it and improve it, rather than stick with the badly misjudged new model which clearly is not very attractive and not working very well.