Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelScarn
You know, you would think that having your arm amputated and surviving cancer would make you a humble, strong and grateful man. But, he is living proof, that scum will always be scum.
Diaz was treated for cancer -- which includes his undergoing the amputation -- when he was a young kid. So it's less likely the experience would have brought about some sort of personal transformation in a "new and improved man" type of thing.
That said, I agree. You would think it would give him a greater appreciation for his life, rather than some "YOLO"-fueled license to act like a douche.
In fact, perhaps Diaz' very condition has engendered so much sympathy throughout his life that those around him have been reluctant to call him out when he has fallen out of line. He has been a cancer survivor and an amputee for almost as long as he can remember. Think how often he probably got a pass from friends and family who otherwise would have chastised a "healthy" kid for similar actions. Years and years of unchecked behavior? It sure seems to me like it would have altered his idea of decorum. Maybe this is the first time he has been treated like everyone else.
Anyway, I know nothing more about Diaz than what I've read and what I can glean from his Twitter feed. Given some of the characters who have come through the poker world, it's not like Caesars has a quick trigger at upholding some sort of moral code. He must have been several paces beyond the usual standards of drunk and disorderly to earn a ban.
Quote:
Just think how much worse it has to be to ban a guy with one arm with the cancer story---He must have been given every chance. No TD/Casino wants to kick out anyone like that.
This exactly. That's a great point -- if anything, Caesars was more gunshy at resorting to a ban.
Last edited by Wilbury Twist; 06-12-2013 at 02:36 AM.
Reason: Quoted WEC, who posted before I could see it.