Quote:
Originally Posted by jesse123
What's strange to me about federal investigations is that they let so many people be victimized. The amount of evidence they collect is such severe overkill. While they're collecting 1,000 pages of evidence, other people are being victimized.
The worst is federal drug investigations. They'll watch people get murdered and won't arrest anyone. They'll watch people put thousands of pounds of meth on the streets for years without arresting them. They'll watch the same guy rape 10 women and won't arrest him until years later; while they could have arrested him after the first rape and saved the other 9 women the pain of being raped.
I haven't read the details of this case, but if it's like most federal investigations, they could have arrested these guys back in 2012, or at least 2013. They could have saved all the pain and suffering that the victims experience in the last few years.
As a country, we need to shorten the statute of limitations across the board on all crimes. The feds are letting too many crimes happen because of ultra-long statutes.
k special agent jesse123...how did you gain knowledge of "most federal investigations"? did you know the department of justice employs over 100k people including ~35k for the FBI alone?
also perps used to WALK. it took decades to bring down gotti, gambinos, etc.. these people have a lot of money for lawyers and i doubt FBI agents collect "evidence" for fun. a crime has to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt and that requires a serious investigation.
as for the victims, they'll get restitution. arresting one member of the corporation wouldn't stop the crime. there's a reason they're all being indicted at once.
also the statute of limitations for wire fraud is 5 years and 10 years in certain circumstances. how long do you think it should be?