Quote:
Originally Posted by LucasVienna
It's still a concern because it determines how brazen casinos can be in freerolling advantage players. If they know that the cost of suing is prohibitive, due to a lack of these sorts of arrangements, they can refuse to pay out with impunity.
Sorry? This podcast makes clear that they were at it for ages, took lots and lots of casinos and kept playing as much as possible because they thought they might get sussed.
How given that they got millions and millions can you still think there is a "freeroll" issue with the casinos. Oh we lost gazillions just to set him up for us refusing one final payout (Crockfords) and to sue for our money back (Borgata).
Freeroll my arse, can we finally put that in the not a real thing box.