Quote:
Originally Posted by Shyam Markus
[*]Unlike affiliate-paid rakeback, there are no deductions of fees (store purchases, promotions, etc…), so the 25% mentioned above will almost always beat the 27% that rakeback was giving.
if you did some simple math, you'd realize how wrong you are. assuming rakeback % of a and promotion effective rakeback % of b, 0<a,b<1, the amount received after affiliate deductions, which is a+b-a*b can never be smaller than a or b. this is just a ripoff, unless you're planning to have a ton of bonuses, which you aren't since you're owned by pokerstars, who now effectively have a monopoly, so yeah you aren't getting my sympathy ****ing cheapskates
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chloe O'Brian
Just be happy it's reopening in the first place if you have $$$ on there and don't want to play there again.
that argument is valid only if ftp money was all your net worth and you couldn't play poker anywhere else. I'd probably be happier now if GBT had bought ftp and ****ed over everyone owed, the balances would be easy to get back thru winnings from increased fish traffic for any serious regular