http://www.cardplayer.com/poker-blog...off-to-austria


Don't know if this has been posted, but Daniel has been working on his NL cash game online with the big boys.

I'm sure this blog post will get a nice mix of cheers and jeers, but you have to admit the guy is the exact opposite of some other of his "big name" live pro counterparts. The NL and big bet games have passed him by, and now he wants to try to catch back up.

I appreciate his humility if nothing else, and he says he's winning taboot. Although, since he one tables, nobody is going to accept those sample sizes as proof positive for about 14 more years.

Can anyone verify any results from these games?

Your link is broken and it looks like he is making up ground after struggling at first (sample size very small for downswing and upswing):

Can't post direct results link (twoplustwo blocks it out), so search for kidpoker on the sites to see first hand. He is tweeting alot that he has joined a $100/$200 and challenging people to come get his $$$.

lol at beating a level with such a small sample.


Change the title imo

hes ****ing terrible at cash, doubt he could beat 100nl

no

gotta thank Negreanu for all the donks he brought to the game.

no

I doubt you're smart

and yes, he is a joke.

DN is the fish in that game lol.

lol i mean the sample size tho is laughable.

i'm pretty happy to see DN killing these games (and no, i don't care that the sample size is too small to tell). he's a likeable guy who's done a ton to represent the game and he's taking on an insanely tough lineup, it's a lot easier to root for him than for a faceless internet pro.

Daniel plays small ball poker. So only a small sample size is needed to show he's winning.

lol

He said the exact same thing about his LHE game when he started playing Patrik online at 500-1000 on Pokerroom.

Eventually he lost a few $100k and gave up.


Face it, he's just not that good.