Two Plus Two Publishing LLC Two Plus Two Publishing LLC
 

Go Back   Two Plus Two Poker Forums > General Poker Discussion > News, Views, and Gossip

Notices

News, Views, and Gossip For poker news, views, and gossip

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-22-2011, 07:40 AM   #991
veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,331
Re: Message of Jeff Ifrah regarding AGCC trial

Google bought ITA software, a company that had a couple hundred talented employees, innovative software nobody else had, was highly profitable and not a huge scam about to go out of business for 700 million. How is it possible in any world that someone is going to drop 500 or more on Full Tilt? Save your one times for something that isn't a million to one shot.
rory is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2011, 07:49 AM   #992
newbie
 
the BIDWAH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: nakatomi tower
Posts: 47
Re: Message of Jeff Ifrah regarding AGCC trial

Quote:
Originally Posted by rory View Post
Google bought ITA software, a company that had a couple hundred talented employees, innovative software nobody else had, was highly profitable and not a huge scam about to go out of business for 700 million. How is it possible in any world that someone is going to drop 500 or more on Full Tilt? Save your one times for something that isn't a million to one shot.
this, buying FTP at this point is like raising after you have lost the hand -- does not make sense unless your Abramovich who has more money that Buddah (and it's not Abramovich, he's not French)
the BIDWAH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2011, 08:24 AM   #993
old hand
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,232
Re: Message of Jeff Ifrah regarding AGCC trial

Quote:
Originally Posted by the BIDWAH View Post
this, buying FTP at this point is like raising after you have lost the hand -- does not make sense unless your Abramovich who has more money that Buddah (and it's not Abramovich, he's not French)
well... but its online poker so villain can always get disconnected...

seriously though: of course it is attractive you pay for the infrastructure and the know how and the potential of owning the second biggest online poker site over night (granted, party/ipoker is not much of an adversary...); the simple truth is that nobody but stars and tilt had "it" figured out before BF so there is value in buying ftp.
Eldorian is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2011, 09:30 AM   #994
newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 24
Re: Message of Jeff Ifrah regarding AGCC trial

Just tought of another possibility (many others have already been discussed) why the potential buyer wants the site up and running after the deal is complete and not a few months after.

When is the BWIN (Ongame fishpond) player pool joining Party? Thats basically half of Ongame and its reasonable to think that many players from other skins will follow as the fish leave. Why play against basically just other regs?

The network effects would then do their work. To which extent is not sure but having the site up and running before or after makes quite a difference.

Not a single reason but may play an important role.
ulken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2011, 09:59 AM   #995
see my coaching listing
 
mpethybridge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: 79.17% dead, most likely
Posts: 14,197
Re: Message of Jeff Ifrah regarding AGCC trial

Quote:
Originally Posted by EYESCREW View Post
What is this world coming to? In the 1940's it was the Americans bailing out the French. It's now the 2010's and the French are bailing us out.
This just means it is 1780 again.
mpethybridge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2011, 10:38 AM   #996
Worships space elves
 
SGT RJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: power mad fool
Posts: 32,438
Re: Message of Jeff Ifrah regarding AGCC trial

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gioco View Post
emphasis added

Frankly, I do not understand after the events that have occurred over the past several months why you would trust anyone associated with FTP. I understand generally trusting people, and I do the same in my personal life, but I do not understand trusting an organization, or its representative, that has previously intentionally misled you with regard to a material fact (FTP said it was complying with the terms of its gaming license, which required segregation of player funds, and it was not).

You have gone beyond defending him from being called a liar and accredited him with truthfulness. I don't understand why you would do that.
I mean, I don't trust FTP as an organization, but it's not like this guy is a part of FTP, he's just one of the guys hired by FTP after the **** hit the fan.

I thought I was pretty clear that people can debate his trustworthiness/motives as long as its done respectfully. I didn't mean to state or imply that I think he's being 100% truthful, since I don't know nor can I prove that he is, and also because I assume all lawyers, if they don't outright lie, at least spin things for the benefit of their client. The only thing I said that I believed he was telling the truth about definitively is that he's not charging FTP when he deals with 2p2.

Again, maybe I'm wrong, but I do believe that. You can feel free to call me gullible if you like; that's not an unfair characterization. I just think it's a little too cynical to lump individuals who had nothing to do with FTPs theft/mismanagement into the same "you can't trust anything FTP says at this point" group.

That said, when Ifrah was talking about the statement that was released either late August or early September, I specifically said that I wouldn't believe any statement without actions to back it up. I think that's an accurate characterization of where I stand in regards to FTP and those associated with FTP. Ifrah has claimed that his motive in answering questions is because he feels badly for players and wants to give them what information he can (within the limits of the client/lawyer relationship). His willingness to answer some questions here, and to respond to emails/phone calls from players that have contacted him, seem in line with that statement. You can attribute different motives as you see fit, of course, and maybe it's a case of Stockholm Syndrome, where anyone who is willing to say anything at this point looks more pretty than they actually are.

Meh, I'm rambling now.
SGT RJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2011, 10:42 AM   #997
old hand
 
kamikaze baby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Canada!
Posts: 1,690
Re: Message of Jeff Ifrah regarding AGCC trial

I always thought I was in favour of free speech, but these FT threads are making me reevaluate. Of the people speculating in this thread about the value of FT assets, the likelihood an investment will go forward, how important the AGCC license is to an investor, how the AGCC actions will influence the DOJ, etc... how many of you have any background or expertise in fraud litigation? In corporate valuation in the gaming sector? In half-billion dollar corporate investments? How many of you have any inside information? If you don't know anything about law or finance, and don't have any information we haven't all read on S:P, why do you think your opinion is worth a thing?

It seems really arrogant to expect people to spend their time reading your speculation about this when your only qualification to speak on the subject is having a working internet connection.
kamikaze baby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2011, 10:45 AM   #998
Worships space elves
 
SGT RJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: power mad fool
Posts: 32,438
Re: Message of Jeff Ifrah regarding AGCC trial

Quote:
Originally Posted by kamikaze baby View Post

It seems really arrogant to expect people to spend their time reading your speculation about this when your only qualification to speak on the subject is having a working internet connection.
Sorry, but our experts in international law, business acquisition, and insolvency buy-outs were all busy today.

Welcome to NVG. But I think you'd be surprised at how much good/accurate information is floating around out there. 2p2 readers/participants figured out a lot of what we later found out to be true just by hashing out what was known and what was likely.
SGT RJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2011, 10:50 AM   #999
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
bbfg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 9,287
Re: Message of Jeff Ifrah regarding AGCC trial

Quote:
Originally Posted by kamikaze baby View Post
I always thought I was in favour of free speech, but these FT threads are making me reevaluate. Of the people speculating in this thread about the value of FT assets, the likelihood an investment will go forward, how important the AGCC license is to an investor, how the AGCC actions will influence the DOJ, etc... how many of you have any background or expertise in fraud litigation? In corporate valuation in the gaming sector? In half-billion dollar corporate investments? How many of you have any inside information? If you don't know anything about law or finance, and don't have any information we haven't all read on S:P, why do you think your opinion is worth a thing?

It seems really arrogant to expect people to spend their time reading your speculation about this when your only qualification to speak on the subject is having a working internet connection.
+infinity

Totally unrelevant but I just finished my master in accounting & finance and have had a few courses about company valuation. I don't even think for a second I have an idea how much FTP is worth. Only thing I know is thinking it's for sure a bad investment with the information we have at the moment is ridiculous. We don't know ****.
bbfg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2011, 10:54 AM   #1000
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
99killed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 6,121
Re: Message of Jeff Ifrah regarding AGCC trial

Let's win a 400M flip one time.
99killed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2011, 10:55 AM   #1001
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
zachvac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,601
Re: Message of Jeff Ifrah regarding AGCC trial

Quote:
Originally Posted by tneva82 View Post
More akin to "I'm not paying 1$ to have 0.000000000000(ad infinum)% chance of 10k pot when I could pay 0$ to get 0.001% chance of 1k pot"
What odds do you want to give me that a sale doesn't go through. If you think I'm hustling I'm the one who was defending FTP back in the beginning and offering to buy balances at 80c on the dollar. Despite the majority of NVG deciding with no evidence that FTP were crooks and we'd never see our money again (if they were right it was an accident and are being results oriented if they think they actually made a correct decision) not one person from here offered it to me. Yet after the fact they talked about how good they were at predicting everything from the start. Righhhhht. I'm going to need pretty good odds but clearly you think there's a one in a billion chance or something so I'm sure you'll take like 200:1 for some free money right?


Quote:
Originally Posted by tneva82 View Post
FT owners want delay to screw the players more. Nothing more, nothing less. If they would have got the delay it would have resulted in players getting screwed up even more. Never in getting any deal. There isn't serious investor who would really be buying it on limit that the license doesn't get revoked.
1. How is it that you know all this? This is just plain wrong and you're contradicting legitimate news sources.

2. How the **** could they screw the players more? I have money on FTP and without an investor I'll probably see none of it. Do you think I'm dumb enough to give them any more money? How would not getting a license possibly allow them to **** us over more?

Quote:
Originally Posted by tneva82 View Post
Might just as well believe in santa claus, tooth fairy, aliens that have visited earth and god. Doesn't make any of those true though.
As I said above put your money where your mouth is. If you think the odds are that low should be easy to find a mutually agreeable number to bet at.
zachvac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2011, 10:57 AM   #1002
journeyman
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 336
Re: Message of Jeff Ifrah regarding AGCC trial

Quote:
Originally Posted by SGT RJ View Post
I mean, I don't trust FTP as an organization, but it's not like this guy is a part of FTP, he's just one of the guys hired by FTP after the **** hit the fan.
He had worked for FTP long before BF (not just "after the **** hit the fan"). And he never answered my question about who wrote/legally supervised the ftp statement about the funds being "safe and secure" written when he was representing Ray (i understand why he didn't answer).
striker_1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2011, 10:57 AM   #1003
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Doesn't have a leg to stand on.
Posts: 7,398
Re: Message of Jeff Ifrah regarding AGCC trial

Quote:
Originally Posted by zachvac View Post
What odds do you want to give me that a sale doesn't go through. If you think I'm hustling I'm the one who was defending FTP back in the beginning and offering to buy balances at 80c on the dollar. Despite the majority of NVG deciding with no evidence that FTP were crooks and we'd never see our money again (if they were right it was an accident and are being results oriented if they think they actually made a correct decision) not one person from here offered it to me. Yet after the fact they talked about how good they were at predicting everything from the start. Righhhhht. I'm going to need pretty good odds but clearly you think there's a one in a billion chance or something so I'm sure you'll take like 200:1 for some free money right?
Zach you can't use logic in NVG it doesn't work that way. You're just going to tilt your self.
Go Get It is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2011, 10:58 AM   #1004
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
zachvac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,601
Re: Message of Jeff Ifrah regarding AGCC trial

Quote:
Originally Posted by SGT RJ View Post
Welcome to NVG. But I think you'd be surprised at how much good/accurate information is floating around out there. 2p2 readers/participants figured out a lot of what we later found out to be true just by hashing out what was known and what was likely.
lol sorry gonna call bull**** on this one unless you're talking about something different than what I think. When you make random speculation and accusations with no evidence yet decline to put your money where your mouth is, when you're right it's pure dumb luck. So yes NVG has gotten lucky in some of their baseless accusations turning out to be true. Don't be results oriented though. I'm not trusting NVG and I'm not going to be paying Jamie Gold for poker lessons any time soon. Both would be extremely results oriented.
zachvac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2011, 11:00 AM   #1005
Worships space elves
 
SGT RJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: power mad fool
Posts: 32,438
Quote:
Originally Posted by zachvac View Post
lol sorry gonna call bull**** on this one unless you're talking about something different than what I think. When you make random speculation and accusations with no evidence yet decline to put your money where your mouth is, when you're right it's pure dumb luck. So yes NVG has gotten lucky in some of their baseless accusations turning out to be true. Don't be results oriented though. I'm not trusting NVG and I'm not going to be paying Jamie Gold for poker lessons any time soon. Both would be extremely results oriented.
Meh, I was speaking in general of 2p2 generally knowing ahead of time stuff like the fact that FTP was insolvent, but I take your point.

Quote:
Originally Posted by striker_1 View Post
He had worked for FTP long before BF (not just "after the **** hit the fan"). And he never answered my question about who wrote/legally supervised the ftp statement about the funds being "safe and secure" written when he was representing Ray (i understand why he didn't answer).
Did he? Huh, I stand corrected, I thought he only got involved after BF.
SGT RJ is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply
      

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2008-2010, Two Plus Two Interactive