Certainly interesting to hear Andrew Feldman's side of it, but I did think that it read a bit confusingly. The two separate issues of how well he plays and his ethics/etiquette are mixed up, and at one point he appears to be challenging people HU to prove that he has "done everything above order".
Had to chuckle at this though :
Quote:
|
The fact that Full Tilt acknowledges me as a good player should shut everyone up because Full Tilt are very selective about their pros and they would not want a player on their books who has the slightest bit of controversy surrounding them, so they trust me
|
And even in that one sentence the two issues are mixed up.
Edit : And reading it back again, I would certainly have advised Andrew not to continually take the line "I've never been warned by a site" / "no one has proved anything". Just saying you didn't do whatever it is you're supposed to have done is perfectly sufficient and sounds a lot better.
Another Edit (I keep thinking of more things), a word to the interviewer :
Quote:
|
he has dealt with it all so far with maturity and an amazing amount of calmness, and now awaits his adversaries to put their money where their mouth is.
|
Um, no. "HU4Rollz" is not a mature way of dealing with criticism.
Two Plus Two
Linear Mode
