I am as well.

With 865 on the bottom, AINEC.

Even putting the 8 on top is better than in the middle.

Agree w alaskandogrunner on the mistakes I made. Also made some other mistakes. That was my first stream and I was focused on the chat, and making sure the new programs I was using were running smoothly as I was having some technical difficulties. Also, my strategy since then has had some slight minimal change.

i'm guessing jason will not show any interest.

Yah, you made other minor mistakes, they were not bad, you're clearly thinking deeply about the game. It makes sense that you were nervous and not completely focused in this video. Definitely can see how you are capable of running hot and destroying some of these random people. Seeing how the Mizrachis and stuff are setting their hands, you'd def have an edge on them. I'm guessing most random poker players who have money and are on this app are not setting correctly, while you're setting mostly correctly. I'd still play you though, I'm supremely confident in my own game. You seem to have plenty of action though.

And just like this thing, the person who owes has up to 100 years to settle their debt.

Be sure to publish the line when it comes out, kthx.

Putting 8 on top is pretty awful

Can anyone confirm which app they're playing on?

That video reminds me of the youtube dude with a uni-brow who electrocutes himself and etc. electroboom or something like that

haha that was well done.

pineapple

LOL, shrug, I don't know? He's kind of an eccentric dude as evident in video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RyO0DgZdxmk

Now that the video has been published (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RyO0DgZdxmk) and that the challenge seems to be ignored, I will make one last attempt to do the best that I can to clear our names. Obviously Jason has no obligation in participating in any proposals of mine especially if they are very time consuming such as the 2.5k hand challenge, which would take about 100 hours. I can see how that might be a unfavorable spot for Jason considering he plays bigger. I liked the idea of our live play being streamed so that everyone could see the decisions I would be making while playing live. My last proposal is to play Jason for one day at the Palm Beach Kennel Club with all of my decisions being streamed online.

Also, Jason’s main points have been disproven, but I will address all of them anyway.

One person I’ve lost to, besides Christoph, came here and posted and there are others who I’ve lost to.

As stated before, barring the PCA I have beaten Natasha repeatedly in live play in Las Vegas.
I do not know if I made that decision. In the case that I did, Natasha and I were playing in a format where the player in fantasy land would be able to see the opponents hand set out. If aa88 middle would allow me to scoop, then that would be the correct play, as the difference between winning one more row that gets you the scoop versus not winning it is 5 points.
As an OFC specialist who did not know any poker players that was my only method (watch video).
I would typically offer 10% freeroll for someone getting me a new player. If the player was horrible I would increase the incentive, as losing versus a horrible player is close to impossible over a decent sample. For example, the probability of losing versus someone with an edge of 1.5/hand over 1000 hands is .42%, less than one out of 200.
Yes I did, I told her the 10% applied to any new player including you.
I have a lot of $.5-2 games with friends who are pretty bad.
Cause I am very certain I have an edge, love playing poker, and new challenges.
Don’t know who that is since that situation does not sound at all familiar to me. Especially since I know who all the people who have beaten me on the app, and never played with any of those face to face on the app

Jaclynn has already addressed the points Jason made relevant to her in a post on this thread. All that Jaclynn and I have done are just efforts to clear our reputations. Yesterday, a friend of Jaclynn (who is bad at OFC) was accused of being a cheater by association with Jaclynn. Hence, this situation is still negatively affecting her and I. Regardless of what happens, I want to make sure that we made our best efforts to clear our names.

You aren't doing a very good job of clearing your name.

Jason has offered to play you. Play him, stop trying to offer new challenges to him when his offer is already out there. In case you forgot:

I will play either of u in Bobby's room up to $1,000 a point - maybe bigger even if that interests u. I'm sure plenty of ppl would take action on my side

Come and get it

I actually think he's doing a pretty good job.

I also think he's doing a good job. He has offered to play live higher than he really wants to such that it makes some sense timewise for JM (unless he is still saying live on the app? are you?). He is willing to stream it? Seriously what else can he do? For the record I was pretty sure he was doing something fishy after reading the JM post.

This is just silly. What if it was Bill Perkins accusing Jason Mercier of cheating and Bill offered to play at $1million per point. Jason can't afford that, so offers a more reasonable challenge, but no response is forthcoming. Think about it WiCane. I've no idea if Rosas is cheating or not, but he's certainly done as much as I can think of to clear his name.

i'm sure jason has a way to contact OP if he's really drooling at the opportunity to play him in bobby's room, as is implied by his "come get it" comment. there's zero chance he hasn't read every single post in this thread, so you don't have to worry about informing him.

this is an easy observation to make, unless you're too busy staring jason in the eyes while bouncing up and down on his johnson - which a lot of posters seem to be doing. he is famous after all!

poor guy just didn't have the heart to tell his wife she isn't any good at ofc

lol

High horse 'nd sh*t...

Shocking that someone that carries around an emotional support puppy is paranoid that someone must be cheating if he loses to them.

Has JM responded to this in any way since his last post itt? Pretty weak if he's been ignoring it

tbh he said that he was not posting on this thread on his post

Have to say that op made a good job trying to clean his name

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Why has a live game not been scheduled to put this to rest? Enough talking.

Jason came into the thread early, and explained everything from his perspective. Fernando recently explained things from his perspective (not sure what took so long, but he eventually got there).

At this point, it looks fairly even to me. Fernando and Jaclynn can say that they defended themselves, but Jason has adequate grounds to suspect cheating. Jason has shown that he wasn't actively spreading rumors, but that's probably a distinction without a difference from Fernando's perspective.

The thread seems to have settled into a hard-fought draw. We are each free to believe as we wish.