If true... rut roh

Hellooo Fernandooo

Is this him? If so, I'd say he's plenty capable.

Stanford dropout/graduate? That's into computer science and the idea of creating computer programs since well before 2011.

All I did was google the name part of his email (ferniesoccer2), which I got from his post history, only 3 things pop-up, a 2p2 OFC strategy thread and this essay (twice).

http://www.buenastareas.com/ensayos/...ys/980410.html

It cracks me up that you think there are "consequences for this sort of thing" in poker. How many cheaters have their cheating rationalized or walk openly among groups of poker players without a care? When it comes to poker players, unless you insulted Jack McCall you have no reason to worry if you cheat or accuse someone of being a cheater -- no one is doing a thing.

You might want to twitter this to Trump.

rut rohhhh

Putin let trump know how he does things. Believe me!

If so then he was sharing the info obv with the girl who went from $1-2pt to taking on everyone

Fernando is busy playing at Zimas on the app.

Not necessarily, but yes certainly possible.

I would not want to speculate either way on that one, as of yet.

LOL, literally all youve done itt is speculate

Didn't know I was forced to do so, when I don't have a strong take either way.

And, yes as has everyone else itt.

cliffs -Mercier thinks he is the best ofc player in the world, someone is better than him so they must be cheating

please believe me when i say nobody is forcing you...

it's just funny to me that you act like you're too disciplined and tactful to speculate on an issue you know essentially nothing about, just moments after doing exactly that. LOL

Fyp

Yes, but think of it this way. It's far more fun to concern troll him and get him to call other people's bluffs in their inferior play in a live game.

His speculation is proportionate the to the amount of info he has. With little to no info on Jaclynn, he decides not to speculate, unlike with Fernando where there is much more info and red flags. In conclusion, your posts are garbage as per usual.

that's ridiculous. so many jaded bustos in this forum creaming themselves over the opportunity to play encyclopedia brown and uncover the next poker scandal- this is a witch hunt, plain and simple. accusations being thrown out there with no supporting evidence and a bunch of randos desperately searching for clues to retroactively form-fit this narrative of impropriety, all because the original accuser is a well known player with lots of fans.

jason has levelled the most serious of charges w/in the gambling world here, and his only supporting justification is that OP "never loses" on the app. well, a couple people have come itt and said they won against OP on the app. if any of you were actually literate and capable of following the thread, you'd see that OP has 1)accepted a challenge to play live and 2)tried, seemingly in good faith, to create stipulations that would prove he isn't cheating on the app, but he's met with silence from jason and a legion of sycophants posting vince carter gifs

i'm all about outing cheaters and scumbags, but this whole thing is ****ing stupid. bring something concrete to the table or stfu and let the involved parties work it out.

speculation police lol

But you did the same thing, except in the opposite direction. You formed a strong opinion, simply discarded all the good points made in Jason's post, turned it into a weak strawnan, then attacked it.

I will play anyone in the world at Open Face Chinese Pineapple. OP, Jason Mercier, or anyone else, if you want, come to SWC Poker and play me for bitcoins. Good luck to you. We have games all the time, ~$5 a point usually, but we can play higher if you want.

So he not only has an exploit for the open face app, he has an exploit for shuffling machines, lol

THIS

Bolded is laughably wrong. Let's see, spamming for action, offering sketchy freerolls, consistently losing live while crushing app, lame excuses not to play live, seemingly making big mistakes live, playing "30x" slower on app in person when opponent is watching, offering to switch devices to prevent cheating which as a ofc grinder he should be well aware does nothing to prevent cheating, and the offer for live play is worthless given the unreasonable hand count and low stakes. The bolded is an example of you either being illiterate or purposefully misrepresenting Jason's position, but either way it's just adding to your collection of garbage posts.

Yeah but he did it with confidence so it can't be that stupid.