Im wondering if a question in this debate is even a good idea. What are the chances that there would be any sort of response that is favorable to poker, as opposed to saying something along the lines of "govt getting involved in gambling blah blah blah". Ive watched all of these debates, and I tell ya, its hard to get an honest response to any question. Most are just simple pandering.
Let's send Chair Bono Mack (R-CA) the prefilled, editable pro-poker Twitter messages HERE, HERE, and HERE. Try to space them out by at least an hour, either manually or by scheduling them in advance HERE. If you can't, it's better to send them all at once than not at all.
Let's send Vice Chair Blackburn (R-TN) the prefilled, editable pro-poker Twitter messages HERE, HERE, and HERE.
Please reply in this thread with "posted", "done", etc. to encourage others to participate. The past 50 actions have generated triple-digit participation, so let's keep it growing. Thanks!
======================
If you wish to do more today, let's reach out to the rest of the subcommittee with respectful requests for them to support poker at the 10/25 hearing.