j20, is erik seidel a luckbox clown? what about ivey? mckeehan? kaverman? baron? moorman?
are you saying every single winning tournament player over large sample sizes, including the highest stakes crushers, are all just eternal luckboxes? and somehow the guys who beat cash games year after year and the true wizards because they make correct decisions in a different format?
you havent really offered any kind of mathematical of scientific though process related to your opinions. you need to put forward a solid argument if anybody is to take you seriously. you really just sound like a jealous hater who is likely down heaps in MTTs in your lifetime. give us some proof to the contrary, or just shut up and go whine in the micro forum about your aces getting cracked again.
the argument is simple and straightforward: there is a large "luck" element in any given MTT. you need to run well and have your hands hold up in all ins, including flips and underdog situations. however, if you are a winning player over a large sample size, like fedor has been, including CRUSHING the absolute highest stakes against the best players in the world, that is all but irrefutable proof that you are a world class player who is not only highly skilled but excellent at adaptation. fedor is just that. by not admitting it you are just showing your ignorance. you dont have to suck the guys wang or anything. just admit hes a boss who is 100000x better at poker than you ever will be. you sound like one of those guys who says "evolution aint real cuz i said so!" or "climate change aint real cuz it still snows!".