Quote:
Originally Posted by epcfast
Agree with the above apart from the bit where you say the % of seconds should be 50%.
I'm sure you can work out why.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RoyalRumble
At an average price of over 14/1 you are rarely backing the favorite.
Is it surprising that if you usually back a horse that isn't the favorite in the race you get significantly more 2nds than 1sts? Maybe a bright spark like yourself can decipher that no it is not surprising.
Since 1998 (obviously a big sample) my strike rate with this system has been just under 16% winners i.e. the actual TRUE odds of my selections are a lot less than 14/1. I might not be backing favorites as per the odds presented by the bookmakers and the betting public, but most of them actually should of been favs. That is why I only average 6 bets per week from over 100 races studied pw as there are not too many 14/1 shots that should actually be closer to 7/1. Also, about 12% of the time I will back two horses in the one race i.e. I am targeting specific races where the bookies favs are just totally wrong and thus I want to take advantage of the skewed market. I am mostly involved in big field races of 14+ runners where the fav is rarely less than 5/1. So yeah, although they are longish priced favs due to race type, the truth is I actually am backing the true fav or most likely winner a high % of the time.
All this means my ratio of 2nds to 1sts should indeed be closer to 50% than 87% 2nds as has been proven by 13 years of selections prior to the run bad that commenced in 2011. My estimate is that it should be closer to 60 to 65% 2nds.
Also: FTR I never actually did say it should be exactly 50%. I said it should be closer to 50%.