Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamSchwartz
AFAIK there isn't a room in the world where showing one card = showing your hand.
He could have king hobgoblin for all we know
of course not, but what i'm saying is the combination of the fact that we know he has the Kc AND the fact that the dealer stops him from mucking his hand and exposes the Kc along with the 8x.. like there's simply no question he had the best hand, was prevented from mucking, and should be awarded the pot. doing anything else is just idiotic and is a terrible ruling. obviously if he was actually allowed to muck his hand after exposing the Kc then things would be different. but he was stopped, his cards were not ambiguous/indeterminable, and his hand should be live.