Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Dan Bilzerian's very own containment thread. All things Bilzerian go here Dan Bilzerian's very own containment thread. All things Bilzerian go here

05-21-2014 , 01:30 AM
Why do you assume he has insurance?

He might have paid cash for the house and is self insured. If you have enough money to comfortably cover a total loss, insurance is a bad bet.
Dan Bilzerian's very own containment thread. All things Bilzerian go here Quote
05-21-2014 , 01:13 PM


Dan hanging out with Guy Laliberté!

https://twitter.com/DanBilzerian/sta...001922/photo/1
Dan Bilzerian's very own containment thread. All things Bilzerian go here Quote
05-21-2014 , 04:41 PM
Would be interesting to see his tax forms
Dan Bilzerian's very own containment thread. All things Bilzerian go here Quote
05-21-2014 , 05:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Professionalpoker
Why do you assume he has insurance?

He might have paid cash for the house and is self insured. If you have enough money to comfortably cover a total loss, insurance is a bad bet.
Not carrying insurance would be moronic. Insurance is very inexpensive relative to the coverage offered and, more importantly, it's essential for wealthy individuals to carry umbrella policies for the liability coverage.
Dan Bilzerian's very own containment thread. All things Bilzerian go here Quote
05-21-2014 , 05:08 PM
is guy gay?
Dan Bilzerian's very own containment thread. All things Bilzerian go here Quote
05-21-2014 , 07:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by syndr0me
0% chance any lawyer sent that

still pretty awesome
wrong
Dan Bilzerian's very own containment thread. All things Bilzerian go here Quote
05-21-2014 , 07:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BustedNuts16
is guy gay?
Spoiler:
Cirque du Soleil
Dan Bilzerian's very own containment thread. All things Bilzerian go here Quote
05-21-2014 , 08:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Professionalpoker
If you have enough money to comfortably cover a total loss, insurance is a bad bet.
wtf, you can't be serious.
Dan Bilzerian's very own containment thread. All things Bilzerian go here Quote
05-21-2014 , 08:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Professionalpoker
Why do you assume he has insurance?

He might have paid cash for the house and is self insured. If you have enough money to comfortably cover a total loss, insurance is a bad bet.
I genuinely chuckled at this.
Dan Bilzerian's very own containment thread. All things Bilzerian go here Quote
05-21-2014 , 08:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BustedNuts16
is guy gay?
French Canadian.
Dan Bilzerian's very own containment thread. All things Bilzerian go here Quote
05-21-2014 , 08:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fuluck
French Canadian.
Lol!
Dan Bilzerian's very own containment thread. All things Bilzerian go here Quote
05-21-2014 , 09:02 PM
Don't get the hate on self-insurance
Dan Bilzerian's very own containment thread. All things Bilzerian go here Quote
05-21-2014 , 10:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BustedNuts16
is guy gay?
Obv, but Guy has probably banged hundreds of girls. Cirque du Soleil is known for massive drug use and sex orgies.

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/29...arties-510602/
Dan Bilzerian's very own containment thread. All things Bilzerian go here Quote
05-22-2014 , 12:00 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sleepingtom
about 10 - 15 of my friends who have absolutely no idea about anything to do with poker and have never played it have asked me on different occasions about this guy. pretty funny. defo great for poker.
same thing. so great for poker. I hope he keeps pushing his "pro poker player" label
Dan Bilzerian's very own containment thread. All things Bilzerian go here Quote
05-22-2014 , 02:10 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by angeles
same thing. so great for poker. I hope he keeps pushing his "pro poker player" label
Don't think he's ever pushed pro poker thing...
Dan Bilzerian's very own containment thread. All things Bilzerian go here Quote
05-22-2014 , 09:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Biesterfield
Don't get the hate on self-insurance
Agreed - PP is clearly correct and I have no idea what's with all the "wtf you can't be serious"-ing.

The fact that insurance companies are able to run (very) profitably is proof enough of that.
Dan Bilzerian's very own containment thread. All things Bilzerian go here Quote
05-22-2014 , 09:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dfb89
Don't think he's ever pushed pro poker thing...
obv he does, he's gotta explain where his money came from some how and saying my dad was a fraudster and i inherited it all doesn't have quite the same ring to it.
Dan Bilzerian's very own containment thread. All things Bilzerian go here Quote
05-22-2014 , 10:15 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MinusEV
Agreed - PP is clearly correct and I have no idea what's with all the "wtf you can't be serious"-ing.

The fact that insurance companies are able to run (very) profitably is proof enough of that.
So you'd risk 100% of an asset and potentially 100% of your personal wealth (from a liability claim) because you don't begrudge insurance companies a profit? They make a profit because they aggregate risk, not because it's an unwise decision for individuals. We're not talking about an extended warranty for a television here.
Dan Bilzerian's very own containment thread. All things Bilzerian go here Quote
05-22-2014 , 10:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pocket_zeros
So you'd risk 100% of an asset and potentially 100% of your personal wealth (from a liability claim) because you don't begrudge insurance companies a profit? They make a profit because they aggregate risk, not because it's an unwise decision for individuals. We're not talking about an extended warranty for a television here.
What part of "If you have enough money to comfortably cover a total loss" did you not understand?

I don't, so no, I wouldn't.
Dan Bilzerian's very own containment thread. All things Bilzerian go here Quote
05-22-2014 , 11:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MinusEV
What part of "If you have enough money to comfortably cover a total loss" did you not understand?

I don't, so no, I wouldn't.
What part of losing 100% of your wealth to a liability claim don't you understand? It doesn't matter how much money you have if someone sues you for all of it and you don't have liability insurance.
Dan Bilzerian's very own containment thread. All things Bilzerian go here Quote
05-22-2014 , 11:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pocket_zeros
What part of losing 100% of your wealth to a liability claim don't you understand? It doesn't matter how much money you have if someone sues you for all of it and you don't have liability insurance.
Obviously they believe that it's possible to have more money than you can be successfully sued for, in which case self-insurance could make sense, and PP apparently believes Dan could have that much. If you disagree, so be it.
Dan Bilzerian's very own containment thread. All things Bilzerian go here Quote
05-22-2014 , 12:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobo Fett
Obviously they believe that it's possible to have more money than you can be successfully sued for, in which case self-insurance could make sense, and PP apparently believes Dan could have that much. If you disagree, so be it.
If insurance cost less than 0.5% of the asset per year (and much less than a potential liability claim), then in what scenario would self-insuring make sense?
Dan Bilzerian's very own containment thread. All things Bilzerian go here Quote
05-22-2014 , 12:14 PM
I really don't get what is so hard to understand about the very simple equation that insurance companies makes a LOT of money, and they make that money because people buy insurance, thus if you can foot the entire bill of a potential loss yourself without much issue, then buying insurance is a bad idea.

I MIGHT be missing something here, but seriously, I don't see how.


It's the standard "Would you rather get $10k in the hand or have a 1% chance of getting $1.1mil?" Insurance companies allow people to take the $10k. Blitz doesn't give a **** about the 10k, he takes 1% for 1.1mil, which is more +EV.
Dan Bilzerian's very own containment thread. All things Bilzerian go here Quote
05-22-2014 , 01:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pocket_zeros
What part of losing 100% of your wealth to a liability claim don't you understand? It doesn't matter how much money you have if someone sues you for all of it and you don't have liability insurance.
Pretty ridiculous statement. Show me an insurance policy that has unlimited coverage. If he can afford a top 1% lawyer, that is his insurance policy.

I have hung out with some pretty big whales, where the topic of conversation was, "Should I take the Jaguar or the BMW for my casino bonus?" The folks in the financial stratosphere have a completely different mindset than the average person and it wouldn't surprise me at all if they didn't carry homeowners insurance.

My main point was that were was a lot of conversation of his insurance company settling irregardless of the lawyer letter and the assumption that he carries said insurance is a pretty big assumption.

Last edited by Videopro; 05-22-2014 at 01:26 PM.
Dan Bilzerian's very own containment thread. All things Bilzerian go here Quote
05-22-2014 , 01:36 PM
I feel like a dick for pointing it out, but please never use the "word" "irregardless". It's not a word. If you were to use it in a formal setting (don't know who you are though) it'd be embarrassing for you.
Dan Bilzerian's very own containment thread. All things Bilzerian go here Quote

      
m