Two Plus Two Publishing LLC Two Plus Two Publishing LLC
 

Go Back   Two Plus Two Poker Forums > General Poker Discussion > News, Views, and Gossip

News, Views, and Gossip For poker news, views, and gossip

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-19-2009, 05:43 AM   #1171
adept
 
Riina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: materialising
Posts: 989
Re: Could isildur1 get his money back because of Hastings + co 'cheating'

Quote:
Originally Posted by FTPSean View Post
Hi all,

here, have a bone go fetch

Sean
fyp...gotta get to work just now it gets interesting
Riina is offline  
Old 12-19-2009, 05:49 AM   #1172
veteran
 
Devilboy666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,569
Re: Could isildur1 get his money back because of Hastings + co 'cheating'

Good to see that the investigation was completed quickly and that everyone is happy with the outcome.

Last edited by Devilboy666; 12-19-2009 at 05:49 AM. Reason: Flame on!
Devilboy666 is offline  
Old 12-19-2009, 05:52 AM   #1173
grinder
 
igetmoneyobv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 444
Re: Could isildur1 get his money back because of Hastings + co 'cheating'

Quote:
Originally Posted by FTPSean View Post
Hi all,

Sorry for the delay in posting, I just wanted to make sure I had all the facts together prior to doing so.

First, to clear up some of the current confusion about the current state of the rules at FTP:

There is absolutely nothing wrong with discussing hands, discussing opponents, or discussing strategy with other players while away from the table. I think most people are aware of this, but I just wanted to ensure that was clear from the beginning.

We have rules (quoted many times in this thread) about collusion, datamining and sharing hand history databases. I only make mention of collusion here to emphasize that nobody involved is suspected of collusion. If we were talking about collusion, we’d be seeing a much different outcome for this case (since in the poker world, there are very few rules as important).

Importantly, our rules apply to our Red Pros just as much as any of our players. In fact, we often have to be tougher on our Red Pros than our players because not only do they represent our site, they are looked up to by players as role models.

After doing an investigation and speaking with Brian Hastings, Brian Townsend, and Cole South, the Fraud and Security team have come to the conclusion that the statement taken from the ESPN article describing the three combining their hands into a shared database was inaccurate. Further, Brian Hastings and Cole South were found to not have breached our rules in any way. They did discuss hands, an opponent, and a strategy for that opponent, but it was all done away from the game. While they were playing it was always one player to a hand.

A breach of the rules did occur by Brian Townsend, and was related to datamining. Normally we wouldn’t share that information (for privacy reasons), but due to the fact it was a Red Pro who represents the site, we feel it’s important to clarify the situation.

As for the punishment:

On the spectrum of rule breaking, datamining, while serious, isn’t at the top of the list. Contrary to popular belief, we almost never close an account for a first datamining offense. We understand that not all sites have the same rules, and there is definite confusion surrounding datamining specifically. For this reason, we try to give our players the benefit of the doubt in many cases and allow them a warning to make sure they’re now aware of the rules and agree to follow them moving forward.

However, like I said above, we have to hold our Red Pros to a higher standard. So in addition to the warning, we’ve stripped Brian of his Red Pro status for a month. I understand this won’t feel like enough of a punishment for many of you. Many options were considered, but at the end of the day we felt this punishment best fit the offense.

It’s certainly embarrassing to all of us that this has happened and upsetting that the facts of the incident were not reported correctly. We will ensure that all our Pro’s understand that they are under the utmost scrutiny and are held to the highest standards of all of our players when it comes to the integrity and promotion of our brand.

We apologize for the delay in responding, and for the confusion that resulted from that delay


Sean
just give red pro status back to him... he already ran bad against isildur give the man a break lol
igetmoneyobv is offline  
Old 12-19-2009, 05:55 AM   #1174
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
luckyjimm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Nursing a persecution complex
Posts: 11,940
Re: Could isildur1 get his money back because of Hastings + co 'cheating'

Remind me never to play on FTP again.
luckyjimm is offline  
Old 12-19-2009, 05:56 AM   #1175
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
housenuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Jester of Tortuga
Posts: 12,857
Re: Could isildur1 get his money back because of Hastings + co 'cheating'

I datamine on ftp all the time. I'm not a red pro.

What is my punishment?
housenuts is offline  
Old 12-19-2009, 06:00 AM   #1176
Pooh-Bah
 
evildeadalive's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: confirmed brietarded
Posts: 3,634
Re: Could isildur1 get his money back because of Hastings + co 'cheating'

Ok so it's Brian's first datamining offense, but it's certainly not his first offense. The guy can just keep cheating in different ways and keep getting slaps on the wrist?
evildeadalive is offline  
Old 12-19-2009, 06:00 AM   #1177
adept
 
Parkparkparkpark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Finlandia
Posts: 976
Re: Could isildur1 get his money back because of Hastings + co 'cheating'

Quote:
Originally Posted by luckyjimm View Post
Remind me never to play on FTP again.
BTW, never play at FTP again.
Parkparkparkpark is offline  
Old 12-19-2009, 06:02 AM   #1178
stranger
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 3
Re: Could isildur1 get his money back because of Hastings + co 'cheating'

Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkparkparkpark View Post
BTW, never play at FTP again.
+1

**** FTP
Torer0 is offline  
Old 12-19-2009, 06:05 AM   #1179
banned
 
Sjors's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 623
Re: Could isildur1 get his money back because of Hastings + co 'cheating'

Hi Sean, I don't know why my previous post was deleted but I quoted a standard FTP letter showing the concequences for datamining and other violations (by normal players) wich was zero-tolerance: seizure of the money in account to pay off victims, and a permanent ban from FTP. Did I misread and are the concequences for datamining different? or is a double standard in place here?
Sjors is offline  
Old 12-19-2009, 06:07 AM   #1180
banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 391
Re: Could isildur1 get his money back because of Hastings + co 'cheating'

Quote:
Originally Posted by FTPSean View Post
Hi all,

Sorry for the delay in posting, I just wanted to make sure I had all the facts together prior to doing so.

First, to clear up some of the current confusion about the current state of the rules at FTP:

There is absolutely nothing wrong with discussing hands, discussing opponents, or discussing strategy with other players while away from the table. I think most people are aware of this, but I just wanted to ensure that was clear from the beginning.

We have rules (quoted many times in this thread) about collusion, datamining and sharing hand history databases. I only make mention of collusion here to emphasize that nobody involved is suspected of collusion. If we were talking about collusion, we’d be seeing a much different outcome for this case (since in the poker world, there are very few rules as important).

Importantly, our rules apply to our Red Pros just as much as any of our players. In fact, we often have to be tougher on our Red Pros than our players because not only do they represent our site, they are looked up to by players as role models.

After doing an investigation and speaking with Brian Hastings, Brian Townsend, and Cole South, the Fraud and Security team have come to the conclusion that the statement taken from the ESPN article describing the three combining their hands into a shared database was inaccurate. Further, Brian Hastings and Cole South were found to not have breached our rules in any way. They did discuss hands, an opponent, and a strategy for that opponent, but it was all done away from the game. While they were playing it was always one player to a hand.

A breach of the rules did occur by Brian Townsend, and was related to datamining. Normally we wouldn’t share that information (for privacy reasons), but due to the fact it was a Red Pro who represents the site, we feel it’s important to clarify the situation.

As for the punishment:

On the spectrum of rule breaking, datamining, while serious, isn’t at the top of the list. Contrary to popular belief, we almost never close an account for a first datamining offense. We understand that not all sites have the same rules, and there is definite confusion surrounding datamining specifically. For this reason, we try to give our players the benefit of the doubt in many cases and allow them a warning to make sure they’re now aware of the rules and agree to follow them moving forward.

However, like I said above, we have to hold our Red Pros to a higher standard. So in addition to the warning, we’ve stripped Brian of his Red Pro status for a month. I understand this won’t feel like enough of a punishment for many of you. Many options were considered, but at the end of the day we felt this punishment best fit the offense.

It’s certainly embarrassing to all of us that this has happened and upsetting that the facts of the incident were not reported correctly. We will ensure that all our Pro’s understand that they are under the utmost scrutiny and are held to the highest standards of all of our players when it comes to the integrity and promotion of our brand.

We apologize for the delay in responding, and for the confusion that resulted from that delay


Sean
Will I be banned from FTP if I sell a database of 300k hands from 2009? I think it's worth quite a bit at .5/1 - 3/6, but I've always been concerned with FTP's rules. Thoughts on this please?
similan is offline  
Old 12-19-2009, 06:12 AM   #1181
enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 97
Re: Could isildur1 get his money back because of Hastings + co 'cheating'

BT got caught multiaccounting awhile ago, now hes dataminig, just ban him 4life, and we will be happy
ShLiM is offline  
Old 12-19-2009, 06:24 AM   #1182
grinder
 
NANONUTS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Untiltable
Posts: 469
Re: Could isildur1 get his money back because of Hastings + co 'cheating'

Quote:
Originally Posted by FTPSean View Post
Hi all,

Sorry for the delay in posting, I just wanted to make sure I had all the facts together prior to doing so.

First, to clear up some of the current confusion about the current state of the rules at FTP:

There is absolutely nothing wrong with discussing hands, discussing opponents, or discussing strategy with other players while away from the table. I think most people are aware of this, but I just wanted to ensure that was clear from the beginning.

We have rules (quoted many times in this thread) about collusion, datamining and sharing hand history databases. I only make mention of collusion here to emphasize that nobody involved is suspected of collusion. If we were talking about collusion, we’d be seeing a much different outcome for this case (since in the poker world, there are very few rules as important).

Importantly, our rules apply to our Red Pros just as much as any of our players. In fact, we often have to be tougher on our Red Pros than our players because not only do they represent our site, they are looked up to by players as role models.

After doing an investigation and speaking with Brian Hastings, Brian Townsend, and Cole South, the Fraud and Security team have come to the conclusion that the statement taken from the ESPN article describing the three combining their hands into a shared database was inaccurate. Further, Brian Hastings and Cole South were found to not have breached our rules in any way. They did discuss hands, an opponent, and a strategy for that opponent, but it was all done away from the game. While they were playing it was always one player to a hand.

A breach of the rules did occur by Brian Townsend, and was related to datamining. Normally we wouldn’t share that information (for privacy reasons), but due to the fact it was a Red Pro who represents the site, we feel it’s important to clarify the situation.

As for the punishment:

On the spectrum of rule breaking, datamining, while serious, isn’t at the top of the list. Contrary to popular belief, we almost never close an account for a first datamining offense. We understand that not all sites have the same rules, and there is definite confusion surrounding datamining specifically. For this reason, we try to give our players the benefit of the doubt in many cases and allow them a warning to make sure they’re now aware of the rules and agree to follow them moving forward.

However, like I said above, we have to hold our Red Pros to a higher standard. So in addition to the warning, we’ve stripped Brian of his Red Pro status for a month. I understand this won’t feel like enough of a punishment for many of you. Many options were considered, but at the end of the day we felt this punishment best fit the offense.

It’s certainly embarrassing to all of us that this has happened and upsetting that the facts of the incident were not reported correctly. We will ensure that all our Pro’s understand that they are under the utmost scrutiny and are held to the highest standards of all of our players when it comes to the integrity and promotion of our brand.

We apologize for the delay in responding, and for the confusion that resulted from that delay


Sean
Lol what a joke. FTP has a track record of banning people for way less than what the cardrunners guys did. And this is Brian Townsends second time being guilty of breaking the site's ToS.

What exactly does Brian Townsend have to do to get banned from FTP when he gets caught multi-accounting and then datamining, when 'normal' players have been banned for far less.

Your own ToS say that sharing hand histories is a breach, how in god's name can you defend these guys when they've straight out admitted they did it and shared HHs.
NANONUTS is offline  
Old 12-19-2009, 06:25 AM   #1183
adept
 
Parkparkparkpark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Finlandia
Posts: 976
Re: Could isildur1 get his money back because of Hastings + co 'cheating'

FTP is famous for its double standards. Now its even more famous for that.
Parkparkparkpark is offline  
Old 12-19-2009, 06:25 AM   #1184
banned
 
Bozzytiger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Duh winning
Posts: 606
Re: Could isildur1 get his money back because of Hastings + co 'cheating'

Hastings & co biggest mistake is killing off Isil, now feel the wrath of some restless railbirds, He was like the Lakers of the poker world. Should of left him a few hundred k to rebuild, then take 60/70%, let him rebuild again. It might even be in Full Tilts/ CR guys interest to stake him. Hastings & co you killed off the Lakers forever!

Something special about that mysterious Swedish kid, Ill never forget him taking on Ivey, PA, and Durrrr at the same time.

Last edited by Bozzytiger; 12-19-2009 at 06:50 AM.
Bozzytiger is offline  
Old 12-19-2009, 06:28 AM   #1185
journeyman
 
Feeder's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 241
Re: Could isildur1 get his money back because of Hastings + co 'cheating'

Oh dear the tards with their pitchforks will be out in force.

I'm pleased for Hastings though....some of the overzealous accusations against him have been pretty low even by NVG standards.
Feeder is offline  

Closed Thread
      

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2008-2010, Two Plus Two Interactive
 
Forums Directory