Two Plus Two Publishing LLC Two Plus Two Publishing LLC
 

Go Back   Two Plus Two Poker Forums > >

Notices

News, Views, and Gossip For poker news, views, and gossip

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-11-2016, 06:29 PM   #201
FreshThyme
adept
 
FreshThyme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 702
Re: Cate Hall v. Mike Dentale HU4rlz?

I'd watch two random bums play for $5 before I'd watch Jungleman play for play money.
FreshThyme is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2016, 06:52 PM   #202
SageDonkey
old hand
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,479
Re: Cate Hall v. Mike Dentale HU4rlz?

This is a very long post so if you hate long posts, especially mine, please do not read it.
It is long as it contains a lot of analysis. Thank you.


Taking a rational look at who is favourite in this HU match and how winning or otherwise a player each player is in live tournaments, I think we can broadly extrapolate some figures from their Hendon Mob listed cashing results.

I agree with some previous posters that Hendon Mob should list all results, cashing and non cashing, for a true reflection. (I keep a record of all my live results and I post the lot if I am ever looking for backing and therefore show my true ROI)

When extrapolating the ROI the most important variable to get a handle on is the number of comps the player has played. I think estimating their average buy in is easier because of visible buy in data patterns of their cashing tournaments.

As a base average I am going to use 12.5% as the average amount of players paid in any given field. This means that an average player will have played 8x (100/12.5) times more tournaments than the amount showing as cashed in on The Hendon Mob.

No disrespect to Mike, who I think is a good player, I am going to plug in a figure of 16.66% as the percentage of times he cashes, so 1 in 6 times, and for Cate I am going to plug in 22.22%, so 1 in 4.5 times that she cashes. I think it is a reasonable assumption that Cate, over a much smaller sample than Mike, does have a higher ITM rate than him in live MTTs.

Cate Hall: estimated ROI.

She has 40 cashes listed on The Hendon Mob, so using a 22.22% ITM rate, she has played an estimated 180 live MTTs.

Her total buy ins for the 40 ITM comps are ~$100K, so I am going to multiply this figure by 4.5 and add an extra 15% to account for rebuys/re-entries and the possibility that there is a high roller or maybe two that we cannot see that she didn't cash in that would skew the average buy in upwards.

So estimated total buy ins for Cate are $100K * 4.5* 1.15 = $517K
Tournaments played 180
Average buy in $2900
The total amount she has cashed for is $808K
Her ROI is therefore = 56%

Mike Dentale: estimated ROI.

He has 116 cashes listed on The Hendon Mob, so using a 16.66% ITM rate, he has played an estimated 696 live MTTs.

His total buy ins for the 116 ITM comps are ~$185K, so I am going to multiply this figure by 6 and add an extra 10% to account for rebuys/re-entries. I am only adding a 10% adjustment for Mike, because I think on balance he has probably entered less high rollers, as a percentage of his total entries, than Cate.

So estimated total buy ins for Mike are $185K * 6* 1.1 = $1220K
Tournaments played 696
Average buy in $1750
The total amount he has cashed for is $1383K
His ROI is therefore = 13%

This is still a good ROI for Mike over a large sample, bareing in mind it includes the effects of rake, so over a big sample he is beating the game by about 23%.

Cate according to my estimates is beating the game by effectively 66% (including the effects of rake) over a smaller sample size.

Overall their results indicate they are both winning players in MTTs, Cate at a higher ROI but Mike sustained over a bigger sample and over a longer period of real time.

To cover the question of, "well okay how much has she actually made if she has been partly backed?" Again, using guesstimates....... if she has been backed on average for 60% equity and sold it at a mark up of 1.15 it means she has paid 31% of all buy ins = $160K and retained 40% of her winnings = $323K, equaling a profit for her of $163K.

Her cashes date back to 18th Jan 2015, so 710 days or 1.945 years, so she has made a profit of $84K per year. This does assume she sold 60% at 1.15 on average and naturally does not include the impact of expenses on one side and the benefit of any sponsorship on the plus side.

It is interesting that for live MTTs at least, you can go on what people are terming/guessing is "a heater" for nearly 2 years playing big buy in comps and still not be making chunks of money, if you are being backed for around 55% to 65% of your action.

Of course as a player becomes more successful they may be able to sell less equity in themselves and gain better sponsorship deals, meaning the same set of results as previously net them a higher net profit than before.

Mike it is fairly certain is a winning player in live MTTs. However, with the effect of expenses, perhaps more likely he is a break even player in live MTTs. But importantly he is in the game, playing medium and big buy in comps so retains the ongoing upside potential for huge scores, as indeed does Cate.

Cash game ability for each player:

For me personally this is harder to quantify as we have less data, unless you have personally played them, and we have to go mainly on anecdotal "evidence".

Known facts:

Cate has a very good table presence and appears not to give any physical or timing tells. Fellow players who know her and/or have played against her say she is a good cash game player. In interviews she has given she states, as have others, that she is/was a cash game grinder. It is not known if in the cash game environment she has "street smarts". In other words if the game pattern or other peripheral factors to the game move away from log normal, if and how quickly she will react and adapt to this.

Mike by all anecdotal evidence is a regular cash game player. Players who have played against him have said he is solid. You would think he knows most/all cash game environments like the back of his hand, and he certainly has street smarts as a consequence of this. I think he may be more likely to give off live physical tells and timing tells than Cate, purely because he is not a full time pro and is therefore generally not as bothered by if he does or not and has not put as much time or attention as her into refining that part of his game.

Coaching in the run up to the challenge:

This is the area where I think Cate has a big potential advantage. She appears to move in the circles and the clique of many top full time pros, so no doubt there is already an organised or soon to be organised group of pros who are gathering info on Mike's playing tendencies, including possible live tells, as well as giving her some coaching advice.

Mike you would think is, perhaps to a lesser extent, doing the same, with poker buddies who support him also doing some pre-challenge opponent research and coaching with him.

From Mike's point of view I think the potential research and coaching gap there is/might be between Cate and him should be his biggest area of concern. Indeed he did Tweet something like, "you want to play in March so that you can get 3 months coaching", so he certainly is aware of coaching as a factor.

My overall analysis is that Cate is a favourite right now as it stands. Sorry I don't know the US format of betting odds, but expressed as UK: Cate 1/2 (67% favourite) Mike 2/1 (33% underdog), but if Mike takes the battle of the research and coaching seriously and steps a little more into the technical theory side of cash game poker with this HU battle in mind I think he can make the odds 50/50 by the time the match actually starts.

If he can make himself a 50/50 shot, then whether he can go on to win I think will depend on variance/luck naturally and also on whether his edge in street smarts comes through.

My betting advice is bet on Mike at odds against now and watch the odds move closer towards 50/50 as the match nears.

Good luck to both players and good luck to anyone who is speculating on the result.

P.S. I don't bet with people on 2plus2 so please don't ask me to take bets.

Last edited by SageDonkey; 12-11-2016 at 07:08 PM.
SageDonkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2016, 06:52 PM   #203
ihavethewheel
centurion
 
ihavethewheel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 191
Re: Cate Hall v. Mike Dentale HU4rlz?

Is there anyone else who thinks after all of this that there is pretty much no chance it's even going to happen?
ihavethewheel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2016, 07:24 PM   #204
mbrown1833
centurion
 
mbrown1833's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 195
Re: Cate Hall v. Mike Dentale HU4rlz?

Sage, will you plz learn how to consolidate?
mbrown1833 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2016, 07:35 PM   #205
jokerspades
newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 44
Re: Cate Hall v. Mike Dentale HU4rlz?

Mentale
jokerspades is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2016, 07:58 PM   #206
SageDonkey
old hand
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,479
Re: Cate Hall v. Mike Dentale HU4rlz?

Quote:
Originally Posted by pokerinmind View Post
Sage that is one incredible post. Thanks for the time and input on your end. Correct me if i am wrong but when updates of their hand history is periodically posted on their twitter page it is a clear indication that they are backed by multiple backers . I think its mandatory when you enter into a legal backing contract. On the other hand if its a single backer or a friend wanting to be some action , there is really no need to post updates. I could be wrong because i do not profess to be an expert on backing. Cate updates frequently on twitter when she plays tournaments . Dentale ? Rarely. Ronnie Bardah has openly admitted he goes in on his own dime and has never been backed in his entire life .
Thank you for the compliment.

(I am not great at condensing my posts, so I admit that is a weak area of my posting game that needs work)

Yes I think Tweeting regular updates is a decent indicator of a backed player. However, how much equity she has in herself is pure guesswork on my part, it could really be anything from 10% to 100%.

Tweeting updates also would not solely be for backers, but also for fans and followers, as it's content that they want to see and that in turn raises her poker profile so benefits her going forwards.

I agree that players who don't Tweet updates of live comps are more likely to have 100% of themselves, because if you do have 100% then why would you want to post info on how you played, sometimes it can be playing badly, or if you tilted or just plain fancied a -EV gamble that luckily paid off.

You also may not want non poker playing Twitter following friends or random people to know about your financial business and how much you are risking and winning or losing.

Last edited by SageDonkey; 12-11-2016 at 08:09 PM.
SageDonkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2016, 07:59 PM   #207
RobFarha
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
RobFarha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: @robbyrobbb
Posts: 7,055
Re: Cate Hall v. Mike Dentale HU4rlz?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ihavethewheel View Post
Is there anyone else who thinks after all of this that there is pretty much no chance it's even going to happen?
I'm still skeptical
RobFarha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2016, 08:07 PM   #208
chasepoker
old hand
 
chasepoker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,567
Re: Cate Hall v. Mike Dentale HU4rlz?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jstclkdabtn View Post
Would the match be played vs Noel Hayes or Brian Hastings? Asking for a friend.
Bravo.
chasepoker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2016, 09:42 PM   #209
StraightFlooosh
grinder
 
StraightFlooosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Iowa City, IA
Posts: 539
Re: Cate Hall v. Mike Dentale HU4rlz?

Jmo offering Cate an opportunity to play HU4Rollz while he's on molly and acid lololol
StraightFlooosh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2016, 09:57 PM   #210
FreshThyme
adept
 
FreshThyme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 702
Re: Cate Hall v. Mike Dentale HU4rlz?

Quote:
Originally Posted by StraightFlooosh View Post
Jmo offering Cate an opportunity to play HU4Rollz while he's on molly and acid lololol
Is that the poker equivalent of spotting someone 20 points? JMO could look at one card and still win.
FreshThyme is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2016, 09:58 PM   #211
+rep_lol
El Guapo
 
+rep_lol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,488
Re: Cate Hall v. Mike Dentale HU4rlz?

Quote:
Originally Posted by DangerNoodle View Post
one of the biggest twitter blowups of the year and an lolive hu match, how ppl could be anything but be thankful and support this trainwreck is beyond me

" oh no some adults are acting childish, i'm ashamed "

smh
this, hasnt been a good HU grudge match in a minute
+rep_lol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2016, 12:33 AM   #212
ScotchOnDaRocks
grinder
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: SealsWithClubs
Posts: 635
Re: Cate Hall v. Mike Dentale HU4rlz?

This is gold

http://www.captiongenerator.com/2587...-Cate-Hall-Ato
ScotchOnDaRocks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2016, 01:12 AM   #213
ChippuhTss
grinder
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 403
Re: Cate Hall v. Mike Dentale HU4rlz?

Cate blocked me on twitter because I fav'd one of Mikes tweets


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
ChippuhTss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2016, 01:18 AM   #214
Kidman411
enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 50
Re: Cate Hall v. Mike Dentale HU4rlz?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ScotchOnDaRocks View Post
Lolll... A+
Kidman411 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2016, 01:21 AM   #215
FreshThyme
adept
 
FreshThyme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 702
Re: Cate Hall v. Mike Dentale HU4rlz?

Video was amazing.
FreshThyme is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2016, 01:25 AM   #216
Brilliant27
will autograph for free
 
Brilliant27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NJ MTTs as Brilliant27/YouPayMyRent
Posts: 4,394
Re: Cate Hall v. Mike Dentale HU4rlz?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ScotchOnDaRocks View Post
Epic, thread delivers
Brilliant27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2016, 01:32 AM   #217
ZenForest
veteran
 
ZenForest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,387
Re: Cate Hall v. Mike Dentale HU4rlz?

Quote:
Originally Posted by pokerinmind View Post
Srsly is correct about hendon. The thing that bugs me the most is when some people dispute the hendon database claiming that many tournaments that players buy into are not published or unaccounted for. That is a lot of hogwash. Every single tournament you cash (except for daily nightly) Hendon will find it report it and document it
That's a stretch.

I know the Monthly 30k GTD at Mohegan Sun in CT does not get reported to Hendon/GPI. Top spots earn 10k-13k, but never get reported to Hendon (while $360 min cashes in WSOPC do)

I am pretty sure (but not positive) the local competitive tourney at Foxwoods (a monthly 25k GTD) does not get reported either........and so would guess....there are surely other (non daily tournaments) that don't get reported all across the Poker World.

Having said that......I am sure most of the MAJOR Tournament Scores are recorded in Hendon/GPI.....

While I like the concept of Hendon/GPI.......tracking live tournaments is a DATA CAPTURE/MANAGEMENT nightmare. They clearly capture the big tournaments, and give an idea of how players perform in those, it's far from a complete picture.

Without also capturing all buyins (even in events you dont cash-which are most) + #of BuyIns + #ReEntries you can't come close to understanding true ROI.

Nothing will ever come close to online poker for tracking real results.

#RIP OnLine Poker
ZenForest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2016, 01:36 AM   #218
ZenForest
veteran
 
ZenForest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,387
Re: Cate Hall v. Mike Dentale HU4rlz?

All this drama because someone made a call w/ AT, and another player said "you're a donkey".......?

What has poker come to ?
ZenForest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2016, 01:45 AM   #219
adam levine
adept
 
adam levine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: loving life
Posts: 911
Re: Cate Hall v. Mike Dentale HU4rlz?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZenForest View Post
All this drama because someone made a call w/ AT, and another player said "you're a donkey".......?

What has poker come to ?
Petchulant children aruguing on social media.
adam levine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2016, 08:53 AM   #220
+rep_lol
El Guapo
 
+rep_lol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,488
Re: Cate Hall v. Mike Dentale HU4rlz?

to be fair, the people travelling the tournament circuit have always acted like high schoolers
+rep_lol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2016, 09:14 AM   #221
PTLou
temp-banned
 
PTLou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 2,908
Re: Cate Hall v. Mike Dentale HU4rlz?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZenForest View Post
All this drama because someone made a call w/ AT, and another player said "you're a donkey".......?

What has poker come to ?
pretty much this...






Grats Cate... you've risen to same intellectual heights as many of Jerry Springer Show's most famous guests in how easily you were manipulated.

Grats Matt... you're creativity and genius in producing entertaining content is now on par with the great Mr Springer himself. Be proud.

Grats Dentale... you've shown that... nah.... Springer Show seems to be right in your lane. you are right at home. Carry on.

Grats NVG Mob eagerly awaiting... you all watch The Jerry Springer Show.
PTLou is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2016, 09:31 AM   #222
p2 dog, p2
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,300
Re: Cate Hall v. Mike Dentale HU4rlz?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZenForest View Post
All this drama because someone made a call w/ AT, and another player said "you're a donkey".......?

What has poker come to ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by adam levine View Post
Petchulant children aruguing on social media.
yep, because 2 of 8 million poker players are currently doing it. yet, here we are reading about it. both of you guys probably read the entire thread lulz
p2 dog, p2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2016, 09:37 AM   #223
NerdSuperfly
old hand
 
NerdSuperfly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: just shillin', yo
Posts: 1,812
Re: Cate Hall v. Mike Dentale HU4rlz?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ScotchOnDaRocks View Post
really good

Quote:
Originally Posted by PTLou View Post
pretty much this...
jerry springer format could safe the gpl and would be a perfect use for the cube ... it could also generate a 2nd boom #comeonletsdothis
NerdSuperfly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2016, 09:52 AM   #224
baudib1
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
baudib1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: dude,bro
Posts: 19,837
Re: Cate Hall v. Mike Dentale HU4rlz?

From a train wreck sort of perspective, very entertaining, but I'm pretty embarrassed for both of them.

Cate will obviously destroy Dentale HU in any real sample size.
baudib1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2016, 09:54 AM   #225
calleveryshove
stranger
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 10
Re: Cate Hall v. Mike Dentale HU4rlz?

I have heard from people who played at MD Live that it was known fact that Cate was a huge loser in cash games even accounting for a recent string of run good recently. I've heard that she's rude to a lot of the rec players, sometimes berating them and is constant seat jumping. When people say something she doesn't like she regularly storms off in a huff. I've heard she is not well liked by people at her former home casino and started to play tournaments to avoid playing in deep stack cash games.

Same stories about Dentale, minus the seat jumping, though not as much of a loser in the cash games.

But since she's obviously smart, she's probably improved.
calleveryshove is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply
      

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v2.0.33 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ę 2008-2010, Two Plus Two Interactive
 
 
Poker Players - Streaming Live Online