Boyd Lawsuit Statement - Page 2 - Poker News

GrooGrux King · 12-17-2009, 06:31 PM

Headz up 4domainnamz!

Kill all the Lawyers 1st...

blumpkin · 12-17-2009, 06:31 PM

Wait, but didn't Dutch graduate from law school when he was 18?

GrooGrux King · 12-17-2009, 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by knivesout

Ooohhh my company does a lot of work for Greenberg Traurig. Can you depose Dutch Boyd in Chicago? I'd like to personally kick him in the head if possible.

2:1 Dutch whips yah

LOLDONKBETZ · 12-17-2009, 06:35 PM

on the first page

ps, obv illegal

moki · 12-17-2009, 06:44 PM

Dutch is quite clearly in the wrong here, and was attempting to profit on the back of the TwoPlusTwo name. If he failed to provide an accounting for the revenue the site generated, and then told Mason's lawyers to "**** off", he has no one to blame but himself.

I would sue him as well.

poopsex · 12-17-2009, 06:53 PM

Dutch are you crazy?

"Certifiably"

grdred944 · 12-17-2009, 07:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CRUDEFINDER

Sir, you are excused from the jury.

+1

The Three Alls · 12-17-2009, 07:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mason Malmuth

After additional back and forth emails between our lawyers and Boyd, Boyd continued to refuse our demands for a full accounting of the domain and website, and refused to enter into any sort of reasonable settlement.

please define 'reasonable'

midwestfisherman · 12-17-2009, 07:30 PM

Thanks for the explanation Mr. Malmuth. For those of you who think Dutch was in the right in doing what he did, you have absolutely no concept of intellectual property rights. Get a clue before opening your mouth and showing the world your ignorance!

acethiest · 12-17-2009, 07:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Three Alls

please define 'reasonable'

They wanted him to disclose the profits he made from the site over 5 years he refused. He also claims he only made 200 dollars over 5 years but yet wouldn't provide them this proof...

moki · 12-17-2009, 07:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Three Alls

please define 'reasonable'

No, it is up to Dutch to define "reasonable" by providing the financial records for proceeds received from the web site. If he does not, reasonable is whatever they decide to ask for.

They could also seek punitive damages for damage to their reputation if they so choose to.

johnfortune1000 · 12-17-2009, 07:49 PM

the only significance of this thread is that that NO way would the lawyers have allowed Mason to post here unless they had done their homework on this one.

Its clear they have an absolute slam dunk or they would not allow this information to be made public by their client.

game over.

rakemeplz · 12-17-2009, 08:05 PM

Mason, I'd think twice before suing a man who's drunk his own piss.

heater · 12-17-2009, 08:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CRUDEFINDER

Thank you for the explanation. That's much different than Dutch was indicating in his thread.

Dutch Boyd wasn't completely honest and forthright?

no wai

**Le Gonso** · 12-17-2009, 08:18 PM

Mason:

I was wondering out loud in the other thread if the other party named is the P___stars guy, or tied into the twoplustwo(dot)me site, or is that unrelated?