Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Ben Grundy looking for stake. Ben Grundy looking for stake.

08-30-2010 , 09:00 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by zoe.
Daliman's cool, leave him alone. At least he has a wife.
fyp
08-30-2010 , 09:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daliman
Well I'm DEFINITELY at least way smarter than you and most NVGTards. Selective use of a stop-loss isn't really a stop-loss, but I certainly wouldn't expect you to understand that. I wouldn't expect any of you to understand also that just because Ivey is almost certainly the best poker player in the world, that doesn't mean he knows much about other forms of gambling. Of course, most of you think he knows advanced calculus just because he can figure pot odds, but as usual, most of you are wrong and I am right, because I know more about the subject at hand than you do. If you'd pay attention to what the smarter members of this forum posted about, rather than glad-hand and pile-on, you might learn something. Now pardon me while this nerd who has no friends or social skills gets ready to go out for his birthday with a few dozen of his friends he has met since moving across the country less than a year ago and his wife that is 43% hotter than any woman most of you have ever had.

P.S. I'd be willing to bet five figures that I'd beat Ivey in a gambling knowledge test, administered by someone like Sklansky. Put up or shut up.
P.P.S. I'll even extend that bet to any of the last 4 or 5 posters that "burned" me.
You have a wife and kids and your arguing over something with idiots that can never really be proved right or wrong for either side. This my friends is extremely pathetic and I'm sure no one wishes that had your life
08-30-2010 , 10:54 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daliman
Well I'm DEFINITELY at least way smarter than you and most NVGTards. Selective use of a stop-loss isn't really a stop-loss, but I certainly wouldn't expect you to understand that. I wouldn't expect any of you to understand also that just because Ivey is almost certainly the best poker player in the world, that doesn't mean he knows much about other forms of gambling. Of course, most of you think he knows advanced calculus just because he can figure pot odds, but as usual, most of you are wrong and I am right, because I know more about the subject at hand than you do. If you'd pay attention to what the smarter members of this forum posted about, rather than glad-hand and pile-on, you might learn something. Now pardon me while this nerd who has no friends or social skills gets ready to go out for his birthday with a few dozen of his friends he has met since moving across the country less than a year ago and his wife that is 43% hotter than any woman most of you have ever had.


P.S. I'd be willing to bet five figures that I'd beat Ivey in a gambling knowledge test, administered by someone like Sklansky. Put up or shut up.
P.P.S. I'll even extend that bet to any of the last 4 or 5 posters that "burned" me.
wow man I am really sorry your **** is so small, for real.
08-30-2010 , 12:33 PM
Funny thing is that Dali would probably win a gambling theory test vs Ivey, but that has basically nothing to do with poker, is probably right about stop-losses, but his general tone and attempt to argue that liking craps is a sign of ignorance of gambling theory (like Ivey does it as an investment or something) just basically shatter his credibility with everyone he's arguing with
08-30-2010 , 01:14 PM
Happy Birthday Dali
08-30-2010 , 04:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by David123
wow daliman is a racist and a ******, nice combo there.

and if he really thinks ivey will take his "bet" for less than 1 million, he is indeed
also deeply removed from reality, as an extra bonus to his other features.
Racist? RU ******ed? What exactly have I said that is racist in your feeble little mind?

Obv I didn't offer the bet directly to Ivey, and know under 100k prob isn't worth his time, plus he'd lose.

Last edited by Daliman; 08-30-2010 at 05:14 PM.
08-30-2010 , 04:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by meltdowncity
wow man I am really sorry your **** is so small, for real.
My penis is 43% larger than the average NVGtard
08-30-2010 , 05:00 PM
Quote:
My penis is 43% larger than the average NVGtard
The quality of your posts is 43% worse than the avg. NVGtard
08-30-2010 , 05:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FoxwoodsFiend
Funny thing is that Dali would probably win a gambling theory test vs Ivey, but that has basically nothing to do with poker, is probably right about stop-losses, but his general tone and attempt to argue that liking craps is a sign of ignorance of gambling theory (like Ivey does it as an investment or something) just basically shatter his credibility with everyone he's arguing with
Not saying it shows his ignorance, but I wouldn't be surprised if he feels like he has some sort of edge in craps. If he doesn't then he's just a massive degen, which is fine, but there is certainly no reason whatsoever for him to know about video poker, comp hustling, bonus whoring, and numerous other pieces of gambling minutiae he can't be bothered with. Not sure where exactly it came up that he uses a stop-loss anyway, but I assure you, he doesn't use one in general. The night he dropped 1.1M or w/e to Durrr, was the stop-loss at 1.5M? There is simply no chance that Ivey or Reese would EVER quit a huge fish strictly because of a stop-loss, end of story, unless that stop-loss was at a point where they have just used far too large a piece of their BR, which is BR management, not stop-loss.


Considering the people I'm "arguing" with, not so concerned about my credibility with them.
08-30-2010 , 05:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Immortal-1337
The quality of your posts is 43% worse than the avg. NVGtard
Not possible.
08-30-2010 , 05:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Transa
Happy Birthday Dali
Thanks, man. 40 is the new 39.
08-30-2010 , 05:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GOONERCAM
do you nurse your morning wood in the mirror?
If I could nurse off my morning wood, I'd never leave the house.

Plus, I'm 40. I don't get morning wood anymore. More like late-afternoon taffy.
08-30-2010 , 05:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daliman
Not saying it shows his ignorance, but I wouldn't be surprised if he feels like he has some sort of edge in craps. If he doesn't then he's just a massive degen, which is fine, but there is certainly no reason whatsoever for him to know about video poker, comp hustling, bonus whoring, and numerous other pieces of gambling minutiae he can't be bothered with. Not sure where exactly it came up that he uses a stop-loss anyway, but I assure you, he doesn't use one in general. The night he dropped 1.1M or w/e to Durrr, was the stop-loss at 1.5M? There is simply no chance that Ivey or Reese would EVER quit a huge fish strictly because of a stop-loss, end of story, unless that stop-loss was at a point where they have just used far too large a piece of their BR, which is BR management, not stop-loss.


Considering the people I'm "arguing" with, not so concerned about my credibility with them.
he uses stop losses online all the time. it seems to typically be 2-3bi. idk how u can try to argue he doesnt when he continuously quits nearly everytime he drops 2-3bi. obv i have no idea how he handles his live sessions but its clear he uses a stop loss for most of his online sessions.
08-30-2010 , 05:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daddy Warbucks
Daliman thought having a 0.30 BAC meant your blood was 30% alcohol.
hahahahahahahahaha

      
m