Two Plus Two Receives Substantial Judgment in Intellectual Property Infringement Lawsuit - Page 4 - Poker News

Two Plus Two Forums Poker News & Discussion News, Views, and Gossip

Two Plus Two Receives Substantial Judgment in Intellectual Property Infringement Lawsuit

Post Reply Subscribe

...

Page 4 of 5

1 2 3 4 5

Page 4 of 5

1 2 3 4 5

10-26-2011 , 05:19 PM

#76

soah

Unexpected

Join Date: Jun 2004 Posts: 61,667

That was basically it.

Quote

10-26-2011 , 05:23 PM

#77

belly buster

banned

Join Date: Oct 2010 Posts: 14

Quote:

Originally Posted by aggo

Who is this guy? Someone do a cliffs on his biography.

He is a bully, a control freak and lacking in interpersonal skills.

Oh you meant Anthony!

Quote

10-26-2011 , 05:28 PM

#78

belly buster

banned

Join Date: Oct 2010 Posts: 14

Quote:

Originally Posted by trymyk

dont really read this forum much but what did dutch boyd do?

From http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2009...ed-trademark-/

Boyd responded to the lawsuit with this e-mailed statement: "It is never fun to be sued, especially by someone you look up to and respect professionally.''

"Mason Malmuth is a genius poker theorist and poker author and his books are largely responsible for much of my own success in poker, including my World Series of Poker bracelet.

"Personally, however, Mason has shown over and over that he is a bully and willing to outspend his perceived adversaries into submission.

"The lawsuit he is bringing against me is based on a domain name that he currently owns: `twoplustwopoker.com.' It is without merit and is designed to encourage me to pay him off or face a substantial legal bill defending myself against it.

"Unfortunately, the strategy will work, and he will be successful in wasting both of our time and money as well as the Nevada taxpayers' money. The only people who will be coming out ahead in this game is Mr. Malmuth's overpriced attorneys."

Quote

10-26-2011 , 05:51 PM

#79

Do Not Blink

adept

Join Date: Mar 2011 Posts: 806

Quote:

Originally Posted by belly buster

If Duth Boyd didnt **** with mason, make money off this site he would have never been in this position to begin with. Mason has obv made it clear, infringe on his property, intellectual or otherwise and will come after you with as much firepower as he can, - enjoy the ride Dutch

Quote

10-26-2011 , 06:44 PM

#80

acethiest

old hand

Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 1,902

Quote:

Originally Posted by soah

This is the same guy who made a site explaining how to make fraudulent deposits on PokerStars and encouraged everyone to do it and deliberately lose the money to regular players so that Stars would be forced to eat the loss. He also tried to to steal money from google via fraudulent clicks on his google ads, and he registered a domain name that had "google" in it and contained content from google.

As best I can tell, he broke the terms of service for every site that he used, usually in multiple ways, and there are probably at least 3 parties besides 2p2 who could sue him for damages. I didn't even check out half of the sites he spammed here so it could very well be more, since the sites I did look at all contained mostly stolen content.

To pretend he had any sort of noble purpose in anything he did is laughable. And that's even without considering his outlandish bigotry.

Yes apparantly he owes several casinos (including FTP) 5 figure amounts in chargebacks.

Quote

10-26-2011 , 07:09 PM

#81

AdamSmall

enthusiast

Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 77

Definitely ****ed with the wrong guy

Quote

10-26-2011 , 07:26 PM

#82

crdjeep

old hand

Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 1,417

Good luck getting paid.

Quote

10-26-2011 , 07:41 PM

#83

Stormwolf

old hand

Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 1,301

How much of the $150K will endup in the lawyers pocket including all fees?

Quote

10-26-2011 , 07:46 PM

#84

rustyshackelford

journeyman

Join Date: Jul 2006 Posts: 350

Quote:

Originally Posted by belly buster

He is a bully, a control freak and lacking in interpersonal skills.

Oh you meant Anthony!

Quote

10-26-2011 , 07:51 PM

#85

teddyFBI

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jun 2004 Posts: 6,596

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toadman15241

When the other guy doesn't show up in court it is hard to lose Mason. Let's not pretend there was a trial or something.

There is no decision to go along with the order. Link to order. https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&p...4MzU3&hl=en_US

Is there any written record of what the court's reasoning was? Maybe something provided to Mason?

Quote

10-26-2011 , 07:59 PM

#86

Bdidd

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 11,104

OP with 1/2 chest thumping, 1/2 passive aggressive cautionary tale

Quote

10-26-2011 , 08:03 PM

#87

Bdidd

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 11,104

Less than $3500 in attorney fees? Did you have a kid repping you right out of law school charging $75 an hour?

Quote

10-26-2011 , 08:18 PM

#88

Jeff Oneye

grinder

Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 451

Congratulations on your successful lawsuit. I'm disappointed by those who rationalize away their theft as 'sharing in the free exchange of ideas.' Stealing people's intellectual property is just as repulsive and harmful as robbing them of tangible assets.

I'm really hopeful that Russ Boyd is finally forced to accept some responsibility for his wantonly selfish behavior. If I had the economic means, I'd take him to court for issuing me worthless checks (e.g. Pokerspot). At least one of his victims has the means and desire to hold him accountable.

Quote

10-26-2011 , 09:50 PM

#89

pizdec

banned

Join Date: Mar 2010 Posts: 538

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mason Malmuth

Hi Everyone:

Two Plus Two recently obtained a judgment from the United States District Court, District of Nevada, for $150,000.00 in statutory damages for the willful infringement of our trademark and copyrights. The judgment also includes reimbursement of our costs and attorney fees. The Defendant in the suit was Anthony Scocozzo (and/or one of his several aliases), a former member of the Two Plus Two forums, who registered a domain name containing our famous "TWO PLUS TWO" trademark and offered several of our copyrighted books for free download in the "e-book" format. We tried on numerous occasions to resolve the suit prior to litigation, but the Defendant refused to cooperate. Therefore, we had to file suit and enforce our intellectual property rights. Although we certainly don't enjoy litigation, we pursue lawsuits when we have to in order to protect ourselves from infringers. We are quite happy with the outcome and judgment in this case.

Mason Malmuth

Let us know if you ever collect?

Quote

10-27-2011 , 01:55 AM

#90

Stoop Kid

grinder

Join Date: Sep 2008 Posts: 516

Boom. Roasted.

Quote

10-27-2011 , 05:54 PM

#91

Toadman15241

journeyman

Join Date: Nov 2008 Posts: 397

Quote:

Originally Posted by teddyFBI

Is there any written record of what the court's reasoning was? Maybe something provided to Mason?

Would be illegal for something to just be given to Mason. The transcript of the hearing might include the reasoning for the decision but I'm not paying to get that.

Quote

10-27-2011 , 06:10 PM

#92

Klakteuh

banned

Join Date: Oct 2011 Posts: 1,975

So what are you going to do with the money MM ? Hukers & blow ?

Quote

10-27-2011 , 06:33 PM

#93

Doc T River

Master of the Edit Line

Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 13,059

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toadman15241

Would be illegal for something to just be given to Mason. The transcript of the hearing might include the reasoning for the decision but I'm not paying to get that.

I don't think he meant it like that.

Quote

10-29-2011 , 12:37 AM

#94

KL03

old hand

Join Date: Feb 2011 Posts: 1,407

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mason Malmuth

We tried on numerous occasions to resolve the suit prior to litigation, but the Defendant refused to cooperate.

I'm curious about this. Was it "C&D or we'll sue you for $150k" or "give us $5k or we'll sue you for $150k"? In cases of non-commercial copyright infringement, I believe the former is appropriate. The latter gives them very little incentive to stop the infringing activity because they aren't going to pay up when they didn't profit from the infringement.

I want to be clear on this point though: what this guy was doing was certainly wrong and 2p2 must have an avenue to stop the infringing activity.

Quote

10-29-2011 , 02:15 AM

#95

BenG2813

old hand

Join Date: Nov 2007 Posts: 1,291

Whatchu want. A back pat.

Quote

10-29-2011 , 04:09 AM

#96

Tomark

veteran

Join Date: Mar 2010 Posts: 2,808

So basically he is napster and you are mettalica.

Not something to brag about to internet people.

Quote

10-29-2011 , 04:44 AM

#97

Gone Goose

journeyman

Join Date: Mar 2010 Posts: 278

So this is the internet version of a head on a pike, amirite?

Quote

10-29-2011 , 05:58 AM

#98

Michael Davis

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 10,009

You should let the market figure it out, if people want good content in the future they will continue to buy your books but if not they will buy the pirated versions. Dollars speak and getting the government involved is an unfortunate strategy, certainly not something John Galt would do.

Quote

10-29-2011 , 10:52 AM

#99

glenrice1

grinder

Join Date: Jun 2009 Posts: 653

Quote:

Originally Posted by Michael Davis

LOL. It actually is exactly what John Galt would do. The government enforcing property rights and contracts is about as Libertarian as you get. Stealing someone's property whether physical or intellectual is immoral. Maybe you should actually read Atlas Shrugged, instead of getting one of the core tenets of the philosophy wrong.