Quote:
Originally Posted by rocketragz
Random person - it depends. Some people aren't intelligent enough to grasp and apply the concepts in game. Look at how many people sign up for training sites, spend tons of time studying, and still aren't winners.
I would think that if someone was able to grasp and apply the concepts then the answer would be they could at least breakeven given a large enough sample size that takes away the impact short term variance good/bad.
You realize why i asked this right?, like if 10hrs or there about of training is enough barring the player grasp the concepts n applies them correctly then claiming timex is miles away or comparing his 6max game to a person interested in flying to creating an airplane is just so preposterous tis not even funnay. If he really is just a few coaching hrs away then taking this bet seems dumb considering he has until end of the year or whatever the stipulation was.
p.s bringing up training sites are not a good judge of anything, half the time the coaches aren't even winners nor do they thoroughly explain themselves, watched too many dueces etc videos where they make plays without proper discussion or why it's a good play or not(atleast in the live play sessions).