Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Statement from Ultimate Bet Statement from Ultimate Bet

03-14-2008 , 09:48 AM
Inform yourself people.

http://www.kahnawake.com/gamingcommission/
Statement from Ultimate Bet Quote
03-14-2008 , 10:28 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Victor
ya, pls u gotta give some more info on this.
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...=151185&page=2

Statement from Ultimate Bet Quote
03-14-2008 , 10:47 AM
I just found this thread, one week after it started. It is probably completely off the radar screen for most online players.
Statement from Ultimate Bet Quote
03-14-2008 , 10:53 AM
welcome. how did you find it by the way?
Statement from Ultimate Bet Quote
03-14-2008 , 11:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by luvcake
welcome. how did you find it by the way?
I don't always check NVG. But after wading through threads for
  1. Team Cardrunners at FTP
  2. Sklansky multi accounting?
  3. pokerstars cash 50 bb deep min?
  4. Ziigmund: Tequila shot Vid!! (Link Works)
  5. Dwan vs. Hellmuth
  6. Antonio esfandiari says hes broke (plus other "broke" players)
  7. What is my avatar worth?
there it was, sort of like being on page three of the classified ads (or the obituary section)

Last edited by VP$IP; 03-14-2008 at 11:39 AM.
Statement from Ultimate Bet Quote
03-14-2008 , 12:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wako
Can someone explain the "super user accounts" or do I have to read 30 pages of other posts mentioned?
the story of how adanthar helped prove there was a super user account at Absolute Poker with the ability to see all the players hole cards is in the 2+2 archives from 9/15/07:

http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/show...fpart=all&vc=1

This is the famous POTRIPPER/CRAZYMARCO hand where POTRIPPER calls CRAZYMARCO'S all-in with only 10-high:

turtle82
Re: Beat: Absolute is *actually* rigged (serious) (read me) [Re: En Passant]

#12098574 - 09/15/07 08:05 PM

Stage #896976330 Tourney ID 1883389 Holdem Multi Normal Tournament No Limit $4500 - 2007-09-13 01:43:49 (ET)
Table: 14 (Real Money) Seat #3 is the dealer
Seat 3 - POTRIPPER ($765740 in chips)
Seat 8 - CRAZYMARCO ($214260 in chips)
POTRIPPER - Ante $450
CRAZYMARCO - Ante $450
POTRIPPER - Posts small blind $2250
CRAZYMARCO - Posts big blind $4500
*** POCKET CARDS ***
POTRIPPER - Calls $2250
CRAZYMARCO - Checks
*** FLOP *** [4h Kd Kh]
CRAZYMARCO - Checks
POTRIPPER - Bets $9000
CRAZYMARCO - Calls $9000
*** TURN *** [4h Kd Kh] [7s]
CRAZYMARCO - Checks
POTRIPPER - Bets $13500
CRAZYMARCO - All-In(Raise) $200310 to $200310
POTRIPPER - Calls $186810
*** RIVER *** [4h Kd Kh 7s] [5s]
*** SHOW DOWN ***
POTRIPPER - Shows [10c 9c] (One pair, kings)
CRAZYMARCO - Shows [9h 2h] (One pair, kings)
POTRIPPER Collects $428520 from main pot

*** SUMMARY ***
Total Pot($428520)
Board [4h Kd Kh 7s 5s]
Seat 3: POTRIPPER (dealer) (small blind) won Total ($428520) HI$428520) with One pair, kings(ten kicker) [10c 9c - B:Kh,B:Kd,P:10c,P:9c,B:7s]
Seat 8: CRAZYMARCO (big blind) HI:lost with One pair, kings [9h 2h - B:Kh,B:Kd,P:9h,B:7s,B:5s]




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



wait.. so you're saying you woudln't call that? thats an instacall phil hellmuth style in my opinion!

That hand in isolation proves nothing but a donk call. POTRIPPER calls CRAZYMARCO'S all-in with merely 10-high.

But it is ALMOST as POTRIPPER, holding 10 9 (suited, of course), knew he had CRAZYMARCO'S 9-high beat.



btw, what is Phil's favorite hand? And what does "nio", the alleged new "superuser" acct at UB mean?

Last edited by luvcake; 03-14-2008 at 01:00 PM. Reason: how do you spell adanthar?
Statement from Ultimate Bet Quote
03-14-2008 , 12:51 PM
you have to read the rest for yourself as I don't know what the rules are about re-hashing this again, but I just want to point out AP/UB are sister sites and share the same ownership and software, so I believe bringing it up again now is relevant, especially when someone asked.
Statement from Ultimate Bet Quote
03-14-2008 , 03:35 PM
thxs luvcake
Statement from Ultimate Bet Quote
03-14-2008 , 04:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LogistX
I am going to put on my devil's advocate hat. It is possible that any unfair advantage is not the responsibility of UB. If a player gets a trojan through other means that allows another player to see the first's hole cards, this is not UB's fault or responsibility.

I'm not sure if that is the case here. I would think that if it were the case, the user in question would have won the majority of his money from a very small set of users who had the trojan.

I hate to say it, but there are advantages to playing live especially where it is legal and licensed.
Bells should of rang when NioNio tried to cashout. Their win rate was not near a normal rate, which should of initialized an audit of their play. NioNio should of had some splaining to do before receiving money.
Statement from Ultimate Bet Quote
03-14-2008 , 07:56 PM
I always found UB to be extremely dodgy, and this press release shows again that they obv. think the same of their customers as Phil thinks of his opponents at the table:
ALL DONKEYS
If I hadnt stopped playing there years ago and therefore could care less, I`d feel insulted by such a **** statement.
Beyond me why people actually still want to play there (guess they havent had the pleasure of doing business with UB`s famous customer support, lol)
Statement from Ultimate Bet Quote
03-14-2008 , 09:12 PM
link to thread on nionio from January (!) and they are barely releasing this statement now--2 months later:

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...t=99247&page=2

http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/show...0&fpart=1&vc=1

Last edited by luvcake; 03-14-2008 at 09:25 PM. Reason: idk
Statement from Ultimate Bet Quote
03-14-2008 , 09:14 PM
by the way, the nionio account mysteriously disappeared in September as the AP case was breaking--gone, as in deleted; no record of ever existing.
Statement from Ultimate Bet Quote
04-06-2008 , 11:32 AM
I have repeatedly asked UB to have an independant "big three" type independant auditor
certify the fairness of its code. Or to have anti-screen scraping technology for us "human" players. Always get the short shifted reply.

And no small wonder UB is withering.
Statement from Ultimate Bet Quote
04-06-2008 , 04:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by luvcake

Inform ourselves about what?
Statement from Ultimate Bet Quote
04-06-2008 , 06:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rakemeplz
Inform ourselves about what?
about how good their homepage looks, LDO
Statement from Ultimate Bet Quote
04-06-2008 , 06:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maine-iac
I have repeatedly asked UB to have an independant "big three" type independant auditor
certify the fairness of its code. Or to have anti-screen scraping technology for us "human" players. Always get the short shifted reply.

And no small wonder UB is withering.
Ya both AP and UB seems to be withering away, I just wish someone would take it them out back put a shotgun to their heads and put em out of their misery.
Statement from Ultimate Bet Quote

      
m