Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Ray Bitar (FTP CEO) Surrenders to US Government - Confirmed by DOJ Ray Bitar (FTP CEO) Surrenders to US Government - Confirmed by DOJ

07-03-2012 , 05:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShipItYo
well is there any sort of time frame or guesstimation as to when we might hear something next? or are we back to waiting for another 4-5 months in the dark...? Or better yet, what is the next step in this?
we're solidly back to no one knowing anything anymore.

carry on!
07-03-2012 , 06:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by aggo
we're solidly back to no one knowing anything anymore.

carry on!
Haha this
07-03-2012 , 06:05 PM
see you all next monday
07-03-2012 , 06:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoTheMath
What about the pros who repped the site but were not shareholders? They promoted a ponzi scheme too.

What about the indication in the indictment that the owners were misled by Bitar and CC-1 about the way player funds were protected? There's no indication in the indictment that the non-owner endorsers were also lied to. Doesn't that make the non-owner endorsers even more deserving to go to jail IYO?

Just to be clear, I don't think any of these people deserve to go to jail, on the currently available evidence, but I do think that any pro who endorsed the site since 2008 has a moral obligation to help compensate players if any players are left short of funds after recoveries from the guilty parties. Perhaps the Kelsey Grammer case will tell us whether endorsers also have a legal responsibility.


when I say rep the site I mean e-mutt, dwan, Ivey , gordon ....the investors who got paid stolen and mishandled funds. Obv you believe Ray should do time right?
07-03-2012 , 06:47 PM
just curious what is the deal with the additional charges they added? seems strange if you have a guy willing to cooperate and then they slap additional charges on him. couldn't that throw a monkeywrench into things or not at all?
07-03-2012 , 06:50 PM
Anyone have a link to the fox news broadcast?

Also, my opinion is that although Bitar is the CEO, he is not the high profile trophy that DOJ is looking for to string up in front of the media. My guess is that although it doesn't go any higher as far as the company is concerned, his willingness to sell out higher profile types such as Lederer and Ferguson could be a serious bargaining chip for Bitar.

As far as perpetuating the Ponzi scheme the high profile players did more advertising and made the brand capable of pulling this off. I am certain that this is who the DOJ really is after now.

I am also guessing Bitar will not see serious jail time. <5 years for certain or there is no way he turns himself in. Yes I know they unsealed the new charges after the fact, and yes I know that he might have had no choice due to imminent extradition. I still think he had other options.

zero
07-03-2012 , 06:50 PM
if the DOJ and USAO blindsided alleged criminals with new charges every time a "deal" was made, then deals would never be made.

The DOJ and USAO can't do whatever they damn please.... (certain restrictions apply lol)
07-03-2012 , 06:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joee
I only had a chance to browse the indictment but this seems interesting-

"Full Tilt Poker provided real-money gambling on internet poker games to customers.."

They allege FTP allowed players to gamble on poker, not that poker is in of itself gambling. If FTP allowed players to gamble on online chess, they could charge them with a similar charge.

.. more to come
...duh?
07-03-2012 , 07:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by black_friday
if the DOJ and USAO blindsided alleged criminals with new charges every time a "deal" was made, then deals would never be made.

The DOJ and USAO can't do whatever they damn please.... (certain restrictions apply lol)
Courts have ruled many many times that, for instance, a cop can lie to a suspect.

Not assuring your attorney that you're not facing additional charges, would not appear to violate any of Bitar's constitutional rights. And lieing to a fugitive in order to get them to come in, when they're already facing indictment, would not appear to violate his rights, either.
07-03-2012 , 07:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mondogarage
Courts have ruled many many times that, for instance, a cop can lie to a suspect.

Not assuring your attorney that you're not facing additional charges, would not appear to violate any of Bitar's constitutional rights. And lieing to a fugitive in order to get them to come in, when they're already facing indictment, would not appear to violate his rights, either.
you are missing the point. It would ruin the DOJ and USAO ability to plea bargain
07-03-2012 , 07:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doggg

I'm not buying it. Bitar is there because he is going to sing.

Howard and Chris are sweating bullets right now.
THIS
07-03-2012 , 08:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by zerosum79
Anyone have a link to the fox news broadcast?

Also, my opinion is that although Bitar is the CEO, he is not the high profile trophy that DOJ is looking for to string up in front of the media. My guess is that although it doesn't go any higher as far as the company is concerned, his willingness to sell out higher profile types such as Lederer and Ferguson could be a serious bargaining chip for Bitar.

As far as perpetuating the Ponzi scheme the high profile players did more advertising and made the brand capable of pulling this off. I am certain that this is who the DOJ really is after now.

I am also guessing Bitar will not see serious jail time. <5 years for certain or there is no way he turns himself in. Yes I know they unsealed the new charges after the fact, and yes I know that he might have had no choice due to imminent extradition. I still think he had other options.

zero
They want Bitar. They wanted him from the start. And now they got him.
07-03-2012 , 09:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShipItYo
well is there any sort of time frame or guesstimation as to when we might hear something next? or are we back to waiting for another 4-5 months in the dark...? Or better yet, what is the next step in this?
Quote:
we have made arrangements for Poker Stars to guarantee all July salaries. You should therefore have no concern about coming to work during this period. After that, we expect that your employment contracts will be assumed by the buyer of the company’s assets.
This is some sort of time frame, no?
07-03-2012 , 09:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kikadell
This is some sort of time frame, no?
yeah I thought so, but DF made it kinda seem like nothing Bitar said in that public statement or email is worth even listening to.
07-03-2012 , 10:02 PM
You are most likely right they want him to sing... but it's just not for lederer and fergi. It's for ALL the owners and all of the money.
07-03-2012 , 10:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tarheelbluez
when I say rep the site I mean e-mutt, dwan, Ivey , gordon ....the investors who got paid stolen and mishandled funds. Obv you believe Ray should do time right?
Even though he repped the site, I don't think Dwan was an investor, but I do think he, like every other pro who endorsed the site, got paid with stolen funds.

If Bitar is as guilty as he appears to be, then he should be sentenced accordingly. I don't think there is any evidence available to us that shows e-mutt, Ivey, Gordon, or Dwan et al. actually did anything illegal in taking their pay. Ferguson, Furst and Lederer should have to pay before any other owner or non-owning endorser.
07-03-2012 , 10:19 PM
I wouldn't worry too much about it. PS will buy FTP and the people that owe will pay or PS will make their lives miserable.
07-03-2012 , 10:24 PM
Posting so I can access easily on my phone...

Or in other words posting so I can spend way too much of my time here.
07-03-2012 , 10:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrewOnTilt
twenty bucks says American Greed will cover FTP sometime in the next few years.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SGspecial
Is that $20 US or $20 FTP?
$20 US. Until I see solid evidence that we'll actually get paid, I consider FTP funds to be worth about treefiddy:$1.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Sobotka
I have a friend at CNBC, it's already in pre-production.
Ship it, baby. I look forward to watching this, if it ever materializes. Some of the asstarded crap that Bitar and friends are alleged to have done make the average white-collar thief look brilliant.
07-03-2012 , 10:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by leviathan74
Also I constantly hear people talk about the need for regulation and I am not sure I buy that either. FTP was regulated by the French regulating authority -for which the French people are paying exorbitant rake- but they didn't do ****.
You realize this isn't an argument that regulation isn't needed, but a demonstration that regulators who do their job are needed?

Quote:
Also, you can make the argument that the unregulated market worked.
You can try, but it won't be convincing.

Quote:
Perhaps FTP and UB were big scandals but nobody is arguing that there's no fraud or failure in an unfettered market. If anything, this should have made consumers more attentive about their choices; given enough time -theoretically since that takes the assumption there's no government interference- the market could have evolved into a place where credible companies took most people's business.
Free market arguments like this only work when consumers are perfectly rational actors and information asymmetry is absent. These conditions almost never exist and the time necessary to reach the utopian equilibrium you posit would leave thousands of defrauded customers in its wake.

Heck, why should we have food preparation regulations for restaurants? People will just stop eating at the places that make them sick and the free market will work it all out in the end.
07-03-2012 , 11:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CompleteDegen
...

Heck, why should we have food preparation regulations for restaurants? People will just stop eating at the places that make them sick and the free market will work it all out in the end.
... and while we are at it, I'm sure the FDA regulations are getting in the way of pharmaceutical companies of making trillions of dollars selling snake oil that does nothing but give you warts. Let's open the flood gates on them too.
07-03-2012 , 11:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDarkElf
... and while we are at it, I'm sure the FDA regulations are getting in the way of pharmaceutical companies of making trillions of dollars selling snake oil that does nothing but give you warts. Let's open the flood gates on them too.
Of course. Consumers are 100% perfectly qualified to assess the efficacy and safety of their own drugs. They'll obviously stop using the ones that don't work and we'll be left with an array of functional, effective and safe pharmaceuticals.
07-03-2012 , 11:10 PM
Bitar Emphasizes Repayment of Players and Hints at Imminent PokerStars Deal
http://pokerfuse.com/news/poker-room...kerstars-deal/

Quote:
The email went on: “.. we have made arrangements for Poker Stars to guarantee all July salaries. You should therefore have no concern about coming to work during this period. After that, we expect that your employment contracts will be assumed by the buyer of the company’s assets.”
07-03-2012 , 11:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mizdflop
I worked for FT for about 4 years, running the Academy office in Vegas. It's difficult to describe how angry and disgusted I became reading this indictment. For a considerable period of my employment, I was working to support a massive fraud. Thinking about it makes me ill.

I could go on forever about specifics that really kill me -- the greed, the incompetence, the overbearing HR, the idea that till the end we were continuing to work on things (see: Onyx Cup) that had no hope of coming to fruition before the company collapsed.

As much as I hope for severe punishments for many people involved in the company (including Howard and Gil), I'm also hoping for a quick resolution. When it's done and settled I won't have to read about it and become furious each time there's a new development.

Jay
bump.
07-04-2012 , 12:10 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by luciano27
Yeah he is/was CFO, you are probably right.
Gil was CFO from some time in early 2007 or so until the end, as far as I know. I hope he ends up in jail as well. All the folks who complained about FTP's poor support - he was responsible for it. I worked in support from 2006 until 2009, and he helped kill what could have been a great company. I seriously hope he gets a lot of time in prison.

      
m