Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Ray Bitar (FTP CEO) Surrenders to US Government - Confirmed by DOJ Ray Bitar (FTP CEO) Surrenders to US Government - Confirmed by DOJ

07-03-2012 , 01:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bizzle03
Typically, a MESSAGE from the President to Congress doesn't have the force of law. Did you check if the Senate ratified the treaty? I believe he would have needed 2/3 of the Senate to ratify.
Pretty easy to check this yourself if you have doubts about it:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...ition_treaties
07-03-2012 , 01:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MidniteToker
I've already run across a ****** on another forum claiming that this proves that poker sites are rigged. So ****ing laughable.
But aren't they? UB: rigged, AP: rigged, FTP: scam, various small networks: scam.

On the plus side of the ledger we have: PokerStars (serving the US) and merge. The general consensus among us players is that PS is competent enough that they can get a great ROI honestly. Merge?
07-03-2012 , 01:03 PM
2+2 post quoted in doj indictment is pretty lulz.

Otherwise it is the standard divide and conquer.
07-03-2012 , 01:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diamond_Flush
Very true indeed. However, if he has gone on the record to always recuse himself in the past for the same reason, and he does not do so now, it could conceivably open a new can of worms, no? I published that possibility strictly as a food for thought side note, clearly I have no idea what he might actually do.
Well, he probably does, just wanted it noted for the NVG crowd that sometimes likes to draw unfounded conclusions, that he's not required to do so, and certainly 20 years after leaving a firm, anyone would be extremely hard pressed to demonstrate even the appearance of impropriety.

But if he has always done so in the past, then yeah, I see no reason he wouldn't do so now.
07-03-2012 , 01:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Haystacks
Pretty easy to check this yourself if you have doubts about it:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...ition_treaties
Yes, but I felt it was the original posters responsibility.
07-03-2012 , 01:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by drumn4life0789
Wondering how there is no video of him being taken off the plane. Usually after landing every is getting out there phones and someone has bound to have recorded it.
Sometimes its hard to see what is going on in First Class. Wonder if they had Lobster on the way over for lunch?

zero
07-03-2012 , 01:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hash1982
I think you have misinterpreted what point 20 says:



In the conference call he is saying to the fellow owners that FTP need to keep more then 100% of player funds in their banks. Also says Bitar and CC-1 (Lederer?, Ferguson?) agreed that FTP need to keep cash at the company to repay players if the DOJ were to take action.

From this paragraph, it looks as though Bitar misled the other owners, and everyone else (incl. AGCC) into thinking that there was 100% player funds in FTP's banks, when there wasn't.
So presumably it says that he lied to owners...(possibly Lederer and Ferguson?...*conjecture*) about the amount of cash on hand...and was stating that it was imperative to keep the status quo...(maintain 100% of player funds that they currently had..even though he knew they didn't have cash flows anything close to that)

If that's the case...it puts the onus on Bitar alone and lets the owners off the hook to a point....HL and CF just say "we were told that 100% of player funds were in the bank by RB."

That could explain why HL and CF haven't needed to surrender to law enforcement at this point.

If the conference call was recorded as they state in the indictment....there could be alot of smoking guns in there.
07-03-2012 , 01:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by zerosum79
Sometimes its hard to see what is going on in First Class. Wonder if they had Lobster on the way over for lunch?

zero

Yeah I get that and I assume he might be the type to buy out all of first class that way he was by himself(with lawyer) when this all happened. So maybe there is no video.
07-03-2012 , 01:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vee Quiva
Yes they did pay me back, but their morals were loose enough to defraud banks in the US so they could stay open to make more money. It's a slippery slope once you start breaking the law. Just ask Ray Bitar.
This is like buying pot from someone and then condemning his "immoral" actions. (Because after all, a few stooges held a vote and signed a piece of paper.. he should have gotten the memo that it's immoral now.. forget my part in it though.)

please pay us so I can stop reading these ridiculous comments lol
07-03-2012 , 01:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrewOnTilt

Actually, twenty bucks says American Greed will cover FTP sometime in the next few years.
I have a friend at CNBC, it's already in pre-production.


What value does Stars get in acquiring the FTP platform? I would think it's in the 85-95% of FTP players with Stars accounts. Is it possible for them to license the platform out to whomever gets a US license?
07-03-2012 , 01:28 PM
After reading the indictment, I think not only jail time for ALL shareholders but also banhammer from community FOREVER

Last edited by tarheelbluez; 07-03-2012 at 01:29 PM. Reason: if you got paid by ftp to rep the site when it was ponzi ***
07-03-2012 , 01:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bizzle03
Yes, but I felt it was the original posters responsibility.
in before Haystacks with same info Thanks for your concern
07-03-2012 , 01:31 PM
link to the indictment please.
07-03-2012 , 01:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by gabbkk
link to the indictment please.
OP gets updated any time there is something significant.

Its now in the OP
07-03-2012 , 01:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sect7G
This whole issue really hasn't became a public issue in mainstream America so if they let him go scott free who's going to care??

Mind you they'd never let him go totally free unless he pays/bribes a little more then he was going to already. tbh as long as players funds are returned I couldn't give 2 pieces of toilet paper whether he walks clean or spends a lifetime in prison. Is he totally innocent of all the charges.. almost certainly not... but right now he seems like the best chance for players to get their funds back and if he's going to use that as leverage to reduce or get rid of all charges against him then so be f'n it. Nobody really cares.

How many bankers have gone to prison since they took 700 billion in a single day from Tax payers? Answer None.
Please don't use the bolded phrase while the UB mess is still floating out there
07-03-2012 , 01:38 PM
That fat ******* didnt want the gravy train to end and I'll assume since theres an unidentified player high up in the food chain that its Jesus and he rolled bitar for immunity
07-03-2012 , 01:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NickStam
Be prepared for your neighboors, coworkers, and friends to see articles on major outlets and tell you "see I knew that online stuff was a scam, you were playing on a ponzi"*&^%$#@
I rolled my eyes at these people so many times, and I still sort of instinctively roll my eyes at people when they make this argument now. But, basically everyone outside of the poker world who heard about my poker stuff had this exactly right: Pretty much everyone who heard about the shady sites where I kept my money immediately asked why they didn't just run off with my money because it's such an obvious question.

It's a nice reminder of how powerful groupthink is at completely killing off common sense.
07-03-2012 , 01:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by stackinsideways
OP gets updated any time there is something significant.

Its now in the OP
Some of the mods have also been nice enough to gather together some of the more important posts in this thread in Poker Headlines. That's probably a good place to check for any big updates and/or link people who won't want to deal with the mess of an NVG thread.
07-03-2012 , 01:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoahSD
I rolled my eyes at these people so many times, and I still sort of instinctively roll my eyes at people when they make this argument now. But, basically everyone outside of the poker world who heard about my poker stuff had this exactly right: Pretty much everyone who heard about the shady sites where I kept my money immediately asked why they didn't just run off with my money because it's such an obvious question.

It's a nice reminder of how powerful groupthink is at completely killing off common sense.
I am old enough to have played on Starlight gaming which also had a ponzi type scandal some 10-15years ago with some of the sites it's software was licensed to. The reality unless the industry gets regulated we are vunerable to these types of issues and hope that good companies like PS continue to be sound.
07-03-2012 , 01:45 PM
#26 in the indictment is cold blooded.
07-03-2012 , 02:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by salesbeast
I am old enough to have played on Starlight gaming which also had a ponzi type scandal some 10-15years ago with some of the sites it's software was licensed to. The reality unless the industry gets regulated we are vunerable to these types of issues and hope that good companies like PS continue to be sound.
You may have to pay $5 a hand for regulated poker. My as well be unregulated. In France it is like a 7% rake. I would rather pay less rake and take the risk.
07-03-2012 , 02:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by steelhouse
You may have to pay $5 a hand for regulated poker. My as well be unregulated. In France it is like a 7% rake. I would rather pay less rake than have it go to government.
That's all well and good, but without government, in this instance, and you have 4-5 figures on FTP, and they're tits up, you're ****ed. Wanna calculate pot odds on that?
07-03-2012 , 02:11 PM
So, the fact that bitar turns himself him doesnt help the ftp/stars case, but it is a sign that it is going well. Correct?
07-03-2012 , 02:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tarheelbluez
After reading the indictment, I think not only jail time for ALL shareholders but also banhammer from community FOREVER. Last edited by tarheelbluez; Today at 01:29 PM. Reason: if you got paid by ftp to rep the site when it was ponzi ***
What about the pros who repped the site but were not shareholders? They promoted a ponzi scheme too.

What about the indication in the indictment that the owners were misled by Bitar and CC-1 about the way player funds were protected? There's no indication in the indictment that the non-owner endorsers were also lied to. Doesn't that make the non-owner endorsers even more deserving to go to jail IYO?

Just to be clear, I don't think any of these people deserve to go to jail, on the currently available evidence, but I do think that any pro who endorsed the site since 2008 has a moral obligation to help compensate players if any players are left short of funds after recoveries from the guilty parties. Perhaps the Kelsey Grammer case will tell us whether endorsers also have a legal responsibility.

      
m