Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Ray Bitar (FTP CEO) Surrenders to US Government - Confirmed by DOJ Ray Bitar (FTP CEO) Surrenders to US Government - Confirmed by DOJ

07-02-2012 , 11:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Devilz
lol did nobody notice this line?
"The indictment alleges how Bitar bluffed his player-customers and fixed the games against them as part of an international Ponzi scheme that left players empty-handed."



is that from the indictment or just the press release?
I read it as a lame attempt at a joke.
07-02-2012 , 11:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by novahunterpa
I don't think this is true the way I read it

Bitar was originally charges with:

UIGEA Conspiracy

UIGEA

Operation of an Illegal Gambling Business

Conspiracy to commit Bank and Wire Fraud

Money Laundering Conspiracy

The indictment today has new charges but not all of them relate to fraud against players or at least that's how I read it.

The new indictment has these charges which are not player fraud related and charges that UB/PS could (likely?) face.

Conspiracy to Defraud Banks

Money Laundering Conspiracy: Promotion

Money Laundering Conspiracy: Use Of Funds


Couldn't those charges also potentially apply to PS/UB

IMO Isa isn't out of the woods yet
Perhaps we are just stumbling over terminology.

The new indictment does not merely add new charges. The new indictment contains all the old charges:

UIGEA Conspiracy
UIGEA
Operation of an Illegal Gambling Business
Conspiracy to commit Bank and Wire Fraud
Money Laundering Conspiracy

The money laundering charge has been split into two parts. Perhaps it is better to consider this an old charge and a new charge, IDK. What I meant was that money laundering was there before, and it is still there. I didn't read closely enough to determine whether they are alleging even more money laundering than before. The charge of money laundering per se is not new.

The conspiracy to defraud banks charge is the old bank and wire fraud charge. This is nothing new.

What is new is the three counts of wire fraud against players. There was nothing like that in the previous indictment.

The conspiracy to defraud banks charge and the money laundering charge already apply to PS and AP/UB (well individuals associated with them, really).
07-02-2012 , 11:53 PM
So if Pokerstar buys FTP, is there any way PS might try to recover the "phantom" deposits?

Obviously that would help paying back players alot.
07-02-2012 , 11:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by A MTT PRO
IMO "he fixed the game against them" means they rigged the deck.
IMO it sounds more like they said no one could win because there was no money to pay the winners.
07-03-2012 , 12:19 AM
Just last night I'd decided to spend a lot less time on 2+2.
FML
07-03-2012 , 12:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by natetate
So if Pokerstar buys FTP, is there any way PS might try to recover the "phantom" deposits?

Obviously that would help paying back players alot.
I would think no.
07-03-2012 , 12:30 AM
I wonder why Bitar actually turned himself in, what the penalties will be, and if players from FTP will ever see the money again...thoughts?
07-03-2012 , 12:43 AM
Where is Lederer in all this?

Sorry, cant be bothered to read entire thread right now, but if Bitar is on the block for this, certainly Howard is in a jumpsuit as well, no?
07-03-2012 , 12:45 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zomboid!
I'm curious about that as well. Paul Weiss is no Jacoby and Myers, or Jeff Ifrah (no offense, Jeff, if you're reading). They are arguably one of the top five litigation shops in the country, and their white-collar practice is top notch. I'm finding it fairly tough to believe that they were just "blindsided" by the DOJ actions and additional charges. I doubt they would advise a client to return to the U.S. without receiving some assurances; and I doubt Bitar would go off on his own and INSIST on returning, against counsel's advice.

Which is why I can't help but think this is all kabuki theatre. The DOJ has to act tough, put on a good show, but at the end of the day, I think they just want this to be over. They are in the business of enforcing the laws of the United States, not overseeing the merger of two foreign corporate entities. They just wanted to shut down the sites and get a few convictions -- not be embroiled in a years-long corporate liquidation. I doubt they would do anything to jeopardize the orderly conclusion of this whole mess.
This makes the most sense.

If he quietly surrendered, that would be kinda boring, so DOJ had to add some hot sauce to the recipe.

DOJ likes holding up the checks with seized money for pictures, just like the DEA likes the pics with piles of seized heroin, just like the FBI likes photo ops with top fugitives being led away in handcuffs.

What happens afterwards is not front page material that the public gives a **** about. Alphabet groups want the flashy headline, so they can get an "attaboy" from john Q public.
07-03-2012 , 01:05 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gioco
I don't think he was blindsided, I think he was probably blinded by ego. It would be interesting to know if he acted against the advice of counsel.

I think most defense attorneys would read the USAO's refusal to commit to no further charges as the same as acknowledging that more charges were forthcoming.
He hired Judge Kaplan's former lawfirm to represent him (recuse?), these new charges are all based on 'fraud' that will have no victims once the PS agreement goes through, so this whole show of shock and awe is a complete orchestration to get passed having to face Judge Kaplan when they drop/non-prosecute/delay-prosecute Scheinberg's case.

Not only is this not 'bad' for our chances of getting repaid, this is a blatant signal that the DOJ is moving full steam ahead, while I'd give Bitar some credit for having the balls to turn himself in, I have no doubt the whole boarding the plane and request to deny bail was for show.

The DOJ has it's headline arrest, throw in getting players repaid and nobody will bat an eyelid when Isai gets a free pass.
07-03-2012 , 01:09 AM
Amazing turn of events. Havent seen this mentioned yet though:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Business Week
The prosecutor said the U.S. had been working with Irish authorities and was prepared to extradite Bitar if he did not return voluntarily.
Source

He may not have had a choice either way.
07-03-2012 , 01:14 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tamiller866
He hired Judge Kaplan's former lawfirm to represent him (recuse?), these new charges are all based on 'fraud' that will have no victims once the PS agreement goes through, so this whole show of shock and awe is a complete orchestration to get passed having to face Judge Kaplan when they drop/non-prosecute/delay-prosecute Scheinberg's case.

Not only is this not 'bad' for our chances of getting repaid, this is a blatant signal that the DOJ is moving full steam ahead, while I'd give Bitar some credit for having the balls to turn himself in, I have no doubt the whole boarding the plane and request to deny bail was for show.

The DOJ has it's headline arrest, throw in getting players repaid and nobody will bat an eyelid when Isai gets a free pass.
I don't think fraud goes away when a third party reimburses your victims. Also, plenty of people would have liked having access to their money over the past year, try telling people who could have really used the money that they weren't a victim.
07-03-2012 , 01:15 AM
07-03-2012 , 01:16 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tamiller866
....these new charges are all based on 'fraud' that will have no victims once the PS agreement goes through....
For many people their bankroll wasn't just $, but their means of earning more money. Stealing that and then giving it back more than a year later is far from a victimless crime. It's analogous to firing somebody for a year for some sort of corrupt or criminal reason, giving them their job back a year later and saying: "Ok, we're even now." Obviously ridiculous there, and it's equally obvious here. Not to mention I'm sure the money will also be returned without interest and we'll be lucky be compensated for our non-liquid assets such as bonuses/points/medals.

Give me fair compensation in exchange for profits lost, mental anguish as well as a reasonable level of interest and some hefty punitive damages on top of all of that and then we can call it a victimless fairly compensated crime.
07-03-2012 , 01:21 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ivvaen
Amazing turn of events. Havent seen this mentioned yet though:



Source

He may not have had a choice either way.
which could also mean the whole "hey a deal must almost be done or else why would he turn himself in?" sentiment may have been wrong
07-03-2012 , 01:23 AM
I recently said that I've counted the money as gone but still hope those responsible will be punished. It looks like today was a great step in that direction.
07-03-2012 , 01:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Do it Right
For many people their bankroll wasn't just $, but their means of earning more money. Stealing that and then giving it back more than a year later is far from a victimless crime. It's analogous to firing somebody for a year for some sort of corrupt or criminal reason, giving them their job back a year later and saying: "Ok, we're even now." Obviously ridiculous there, and it's equally obvious here. Not to mention I'm sure the money will also be returned without interest and we'll be lucky be compensated for our non-liquid assets such as bonuses/points/medals.

Give me fair compensation in exchange for profits lost, mental anguish as well as a reasonable level of interest and some hefty punitive damages on top of all of that and then we can call it a victimless fairly compensated crime.

I'm not talking about justice, I'm talking about justification, they likely have wink nod deal that Bitar will plead to and be home by his 45th birthday, but for right now having arrested the perpetrator of a global ponzi scheme will deflect everyone's attention away from not making any UIGEA prosecutions for BF.

If everyone gets paid from PokerStars in return for FTP's assets, then repayment legally came from FTP so they can justify accepting a plead to a lesser charge.
07-03-2012 , 01:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ivvaen
Amazing turn of events. Havent seen this mentioned yet though:



Source

He may not have had a choice either way.
LOL @ The new indictment, he said, could result in a sentence that would be "measured in decades.".....They carry a potential maximum prison sentence of 145 years upon conviction.

Hope this is closer to being sorted out though. Everything seems to be legit so I guess we'll just have to sit back and watch the events unfold.
07-03-2012 , 01:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Wray
Amazing
07-03-2012 , 02:06 AM
I said this in the containment thread. I'll say it here as well.


Not a chance in Hell Ray was unaware that there was greater than 99% chance he would face new chargers.

I can say with some confidences that the new charges are a PR stunt by the DOJ.. and Ray for that matter

That being said Ray will likely spend time in Jail. Less than 10 years.. less than 5 probably.

The DOJ gets the headline , money and can claim they saved US players...
07-03-2012 , 02:58 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by black_friday
I said this in the containment thread. I'll say it here as well.


Not a chance in Hell Ray was unaware that there was greater than 99% chance he would face new chargers.

I can say with some confidences that the new charges are a PR stunt by the DOJ.. and Ray for that matter

That being said Ray will likely spend time in Jail. Less than 10 years.. less than 5 probably.

The DOJ gets the headline , money and can claim they saved US players...
It will be fascinating to watch how this plays out. I believe the script has already been written.
07-03-2012 , 03:01 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Do it Right
For many people their bankroll wasn't just $, but their means of earning more money. Stealing that and then giving it back more than a year later is far from a victimless crime. It's analogous to firing somebody for a year for some sort of corrupt or criminal reason, giving them their job back a year later and saying: "Ok, we're even now." Obviously ridiculous there, and it's equally obvious here. Not to mention I'm sure the money will also be returned without interest and we'll be lucky be compensated for our non-liquid assets such as bonuses/points/medals.

Give me fair compensation in exchange for profits lost, mental anguish as well as a reasonable level of interest and some hefty punitive damages on top of all of that and then we can call it a victimless fairly compensated crime.
Yeah pretty much. As I said, I hope they give the victims of this crime a chance to speak or at least write a letter to the court. I'll have no problem telling Kaplin why Bitar deserves 145 years. At least he's were he belongs tonight. Hopefully, he stays there.
07-03-2012 , 03:25 AM
put this ****ing slob in a federal pound me in the ass prison
07-03-2012 , 03:39 AM
any short cliffs like about Howard and Chris are they also in simular situation as Bitar
07-03-2012 , 03:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by natetate
So if Pokerstar buys FTP, is there any way PS might try to recover the "phantom" deposits?

Obviously that would help paying back players alot.
If they have reliable information on which accounts and for how much $, I'd be surprised if they didn't deduct said phantom deposits from corresponding player balances where possible. They likely would have to eat losses on balances of 0 or less than what phantom deposits were made (which is probably a large majority).

      
m