Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Ray Bitar (FTP CEO) Surrenders to US Government - Confirmed by DOJ Ray Bitar (FTP CEO) Surrenders to US Government - Confirmed by DOJ

07-03-2012 , 06:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tamiller866

If everyone gets paid from PokerStars in return for FTP's assets, then repayment legally came from FTP so they can justify accepting a plead to a lesser charge.
Disagree here. if players were to receive restitution of their player account balances, via DOJ, PS or anyone else, this does not equate to "repayment legally coming from FTP". I know you didn't mean that literally, but imo, receiving players balances back, is not the same as players relinquishing any assertion that they were not otherwise harmed.

That said, as has been evident already in this case, DOJ has no problem justifying accepting any lesser pleas.
07-03-2012 , 06:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Morphismus
Money
Stars is going to end up losing an obscene amount of money after all is said and done. Online poker is dying and they already own the vast majority of the market so it's not like FTP will be a beacon of new profits for them.

There's one thing they, and Isai in particular, are after here:

07-03-2012 , 06:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by zoomie123
DF, I'm curious to know what you think PS motivation is in buying FT?
Motivation is simple Isai wants to be free and able to travel out of the IOM, what is the use of billions when you stuck on a small wet, windy little island?

Will they get back in the US after, either PS or FTP? Who knows, but still worth all the money for Isai to be free, after all it is his money.
07-03-2012 , 06:56 AM
http://money.cnn.com/2012/07/02/news....htm?hpt=hp_t2

CNN link - no new news, but plenty of entertaining user comments.
07-03-2012 , 06:57 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by braminc
If they have reliable information on which accounts and for how much $, I'd be surprised if they didn't deduct said phantom deposits from corresponding player balances where possible. They likely would have to eat losses on balances of 0 or less than what phantom deposits were made (which is probably a large majority).
IIRC, this was represented in court like a year ago to be possible for approximately only $ 9M of the outstanding $128M.
07-03-2012 , 06:57 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diamond_Flush
Apologies for not posting ITT yesterday, but I made conscious decisions how best to spend my time, which made it less possible to be here. I think most questions have already been answered, will try to catch up
DF, you know that for almost everyone lurking here daily like myself, all we really want to do is wake up one day to see something positive from someone like you about our money. Whilst I obviously despise what those clowns did with it, after so long now I can't even bring myself to read through every new document explaining just how they stole from me, I just want it back and to forget about it.

You've been "cautiously optimistic" for a while now, are you feeling significantly more optimistic now? Or, like others have mentioned, do the extra charges heaped on Ray somehow make it less likely that Isai/whoever would want to cut a deal with the DOJ?

Thanks as ever!
07-03-2012 , 07:01 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Haystacks
OK thx. So how were US PokerStars players actually funding their accounts in early 2011?
WU worked fine 4 me plus a prepaid card worked fine.
07-03-2012 , 07:01 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Do it Right
Stars is going to end up losing an obscene amount of money after all is said and done.
I didn't say earning money.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Do it Right
There's one thing they, and Isai in particular, are after here:
They're after Scotland?
07-03-2012 , 07:03 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ashinynickel
I actually had to go through the document myself because I simply could not believe the number $2,500,000,000. Amazing that they have to forfeit at least $2.5bn and only $390m is owed to players.

If they had anywhere near that sum of money combined why couldn't they just pay for that out of their own pocket and make this whole thing go away?
FYI, it's typical for every charge in these cases to list the requested forfeiture amount as every single dollar the company ever handled (check every payment processor case for the last years). This is because the DOJ asserts that it was an illegal business all along, and rarely has any bearing on the final amount agreed to in any of the cases.
07-03-2012 , 07:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diamond_Flush
Just to be clear, I am pretty sure that if Kaplan must recuse himself as I suggested, he would only be doing so as it relates to Bitar, and there is no reason to believe he wouldn't continue to be the one on the bench for any other defendants (assuming the same conflict didn't exist for them). As to this being the only motive for Bitar to hire Baughman, keep in mind that there is no way of knowing who he might draw from the pool for a new judge. He could conceivably do worse.

As to the DOJ/FBI's handling of "putting on the show", I couldn't agree more. Bitar obviously agreed to be taken in voluntarily already, with or without new charges.

As to the aforementioned "free pass" there is no reason to suspect that is anything more than a rumor at vthis point.

Agree on Kaplan, but Bitar is really the only one they would need Kaplan to recuse himself from, even if he were inclined to say that SDNY is making him the 'fall guy' and dismiss the case, his relationship with Baughman's firm has him in a pickle.

Of course everything is speculation/rumor until it happens, but the poker stars seem clearly aligned for Scheinberg from my vantage point.
07-03-2012 , 07:09 AM
D_F did u learn about Bitar from this thread or from ur sources?
07-03-2012 , 07:23 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Haystacks
So in 2010-11 the US Govt was clamping downheavily on payment processors, making it increasingly problematic for FTP & PokerStars players in the US players to fund their accounts.

However, PokerStars seemed to be able to function pretty adequately prior to Black Friday, whereas FTP instead chose to resort to fraud.

Which begs the question, how was PokerStars able to get round those same payment processor problems?
The struggled with many/all of the same obstacles, but, as any well run business should, they made adjustments (cutting off some echecks options, collecting on prior non-collected echecks, etc)
07-03-2012 , 07:27 AM
DF, guess you can confirm now PS is indeed paying the salaries.
You implied this 22 June.

It makes it more likely everything in the mail is true so that would be interesting information.
07-03-2012 , 07:28 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Morphismus


They're after Scotland?
No, Mel Gibson.
07-03-2012 , 07:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ashinynickel
If the numbers are correct and the top brass at FTP pocketed hundreds of millions each, it may be that PokerStars simply didn't pay themselves as handsomely.
How the heck did you reach this conclusion? The documents say that FTP owners (not top brass) received over $400 million since 2007, when they began receiving distributions. This is an aggragate number, all inclusive, not for each owner/manager/top brass.
07-03-2012 , 07:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diamond_Flush
While we do not know what plans DOJ ever had/has for extradition in this case, I'll take issue with Devlin-Brown not really saying what this says. What he did say to the judge, was that there are problems with extradition laws in some countries(presumably including ireland) because of the issues relating to the requisite dual criminality features of some extradition treaties, (which we, as mere laypersons, have discussed for a year on this forum). I never heard him say "we were going after him anyway" or anything similar (I would be happy to change my opinion on this when someone gets the transcript).

What he did say was with regard to his request for denial of bond, as they (USAO) foresee those same potential issues with extradition in other places if Bitar were to flee. I thought it was pretty odd that a prosecutor would say on the record in court, that they have problems bringing these ppl in via extradition. Not that it matters is someone were to flee, but this bordereed on saying "well done guys, now we can't get you"?
getting irish gov to extradite anyone to the usa is never gonna be a problem previous govs here have broken the constitution to oblige usa . allowing planes to land with prisoners on board. there is nothing the irish gov wont do for usa on request.
07-03-2012 , 07:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by New User
DF, you know that for almost everyone lurking here daily like myself, all we really want to do is wake up one day to see something positive from someone like you about our money. Whilst I obviously despise what those clowns did with it, after so long now I can't even bring myself to read through every new document explaining just how they stole from me, I just want it back and to forget about it.

You've been "cautiously optimistic" for a while now, are you feeling significantly more optimistic now? Or, like others have mentioned, do the extra charges heaped on Ray somehow make it less likely that Isai/whoever would want to cut a deal with the DOJ?

Thanks as ever!
Exactly what I am thinking. What is your opinion DF?
07-03-2012 , 07:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by upgrade
getting irish gov to extradite anyone to the usa is never gonna be a problem previous govs here have broken the constitution to oblige usa . allowing planes to land with prisoners on board. there is nothing the irish gov wont do for usa on request.
Much appreciated, Emerald Island.
07-03-2012 , 07:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Do it Right
Online poker is dying
If I had a penny...
07-03-2012 , 07:48 AM
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000....html?mod=e2tw if it hasn't been posted
07-03-2012 , 07:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by New User
DF, you know that for almost everyone lurking here daily like myself, all we really want to do is wake up one day to see something positive from someone like you about our money. Whilst I obviously despise what those clowns did with it, after so long now I can't even bring myself to read through every new document explaining just how they stole from me, I just want it back and to forget about it.

You've been "cautiously optimistic" for a while now, are you feeling significantly more optimistic now? Or, like others have mentioned, do the extra charges heaped on Ray somehow make it less likely that Isai/whoever would want to cut a deal with the DOJ?

Thanks as ever!
Ty for the kind words.

IMHO, the superceding indictment in the criminal case should have no significant impact on the deal currently in the works in the civil complaint. I remain optimistic in this regard.
07-03-2012 , 07:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diamond_Flush
Ty for the kind words.

IMHO, the superceding indictment in the criminal case should have no significant impact on the deal currently in the works in the civil complaint. I remain optimistic in this regard.
Then why does Bitar say in his email that his surrender is in the direction for paying the players back and finalizing the deal?
07-03-2012 , 07:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpecialOne
D_F did u learn about Bitar from this thread or from ur sources?
This thread had no effect on my work yesterday.
07-03-2012 , 07:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubbleblower
DF, guess you can confirm now PS is indeed paying the salaries.
You implied this 22 June.

It makes it more likely everything in the mail is true so that would be interesting information.
I havent gone back to read what I may have posted on that day, but iirc, what I said is that regardless of rumors being circulated, that FTP owners were not sending out personal checks to see that the employees were being paid.
07-03-2012 , 08:08 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpecialOne
Then why does Bitar say in his email that his surrender is in the direction for paying the players back and finalizing the deal?
Pretty sure he didnt say that there was some deal that if he surrendered that a deal will be completed with PS and the DOJ, and no one should be thinking any thing like that imo.

I do not speak for Bitar, and I dont have his statement in front of me right now, but I think that he was referring more to the timing of him voluntarily surrendering being when he believed that a deal for repayment to players was nearing completion.

      
m