Quote:
Originally Posted by Warder
If states fence off ROW but have shared player pools among states then liquidity is a non issue. Segregated markets would fair a lot better if they didn't treat their customers like this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OBuNFI2uaNU#t=29s
I think it's pretty telling that everybody that argues for ROW inclusion is ROW themselves and those that don't want it are all players from the U.S.
Or ROW players have experienced segregated markets. The smaller a site gets the worse it gets. Global pokerstars gets worse every time somebody leaves (US, france, italy, spain, portugal, etc) and the .fr sites that I was allowed to play on went from awesome at first to worse and worse as of late. And those have a player pool shared between half of europe.
A playerpool shared between the whole US would be good too, at least that site wouldn't suck and die off super quickly. It'd still be awesome to have a global site though, just like I want all the european countries back. Players attract more players, shattering records for tournament fields attracts players. Part of the decrease in poker growth/decline in the past years is all the legalization BS.