Quote:
Originally Posted by sauce123
Ah but of course. If x has achieved more in poker than y, then x is right about everything whenever he gets in a discussion with y regardless of the facts. you must be american
You are correct, but I think if Jason Mo had a legitimate argument to make about Dwan (which he does), then he can do so by speaking about it without completely attacking Dwan and spamming tweets, and things that are irrelevant. Why mention that Dwan's biggest earnings from Guy? Do you think that was proper of Jason to do?
This guy has a legit argument, but there was no need to attack Dwan imo, he could have done so in a civilized manner and aired his grievances, but he's way out of line.